Sue Lauder

604 total citations
19 papers, 406 citations indexed

About

Sue Lauder is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sue Lauder has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 406 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 9 papers in Applied Psychology and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sue Lauder's work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (10 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers). Sue Lauder is often cited by papers focused on Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (10 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (9 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers). Sue Lauder collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United States. Sue Lauder's co-authors include Michael Berk, Lesley Berk, David Castle, Seetal Dodd, Monica Gilbert, Greg Murray, Andrea Chester, Emma Gliddon, Carolynne White and Leon Piterman and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Sue Lauder

18 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sue Lauder Australia 11 294 136 109 81 58 19 406
María Reinares Spain 6 572 1.9× 210 1.5× 52 0.5× 106 1.3× 51 0.9× 8 645
Caryl Barnes Australia 7 90 0.3× 77 0.6× 39 0.4× 27 0.3× 18 0.3× 10 269
Iris Molosankwe United Kingdom 5 44 0.1× 149 1.1× 74 0.7× 27 0.3× 60 1.0× 5 304
Claire Ford United Kingdom 4 141 0.5× 243 1.8× 17 0.2× 41 0.5× 41 0.7× 5 356
Richard Bowskill United Kingdom 6 200 0.7× 144 1.1× 23 0.2× 58 0.7× 26 0.4× 9 380
Rebecca S. Oberman United States 8 63 0.2× 95 0.7× 76 0.7× 47 0.6× 27 0.5× 23 325
Linda McBride United States 10 398 1.4× 262 1.9× 11 0.1× 103 1.3× 21 0.4× 17 541
Mary Jane Tacchi United Kingdom 8 283 1.0× 219 1.6× 14 0.1× 26 0.3× 48 0.8× 16 468
Lars Häggström Sweden 7 84 0.3× 56 0.4× 13 0.1× 30 0.4× 72 1.2× 10 284
Ramin Mojtabai United States 9 266 0.9× 224 1.6× 28 0.3× 10 0.1× 97 1.7× 9 434

Countries citing papers authored by Sue Lauder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sue Lauder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sue Lauder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sue Lauder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sue Lauder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sue Lauder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sue Lauder. The network helps show where Sue Lauder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sue Lauder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sue Lauder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sue Lauder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sue Lauder. Sue Lauder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Chatterton, Mary Lou, Yong Yi Lee, Lesley Berk, et al.. (2022). Cost-Utility and Cost-effectiveness of MoodSwings 2.0, an Internet-Based Self-management Program for Bipolar Disorder: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mental Health. 9(11). e36496–e36496. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gliddon, Emma, Victoria E. Cosgrove, Lesley Berk, et al.. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of MoodSwings 2.0: An internet‐based self‐management program for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders. 21(1). 28–39. 35 indexed citations
3.
Klein, Britt, Andrew Stranieri, Richard Dazeley, et al.. (2018). Supporting Regional Aged Care Nursing Staff to Manage Residents' Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia, in Real Time, Using the Nurses' Behavioural Assistant (NBA): A Pilot Site 'End-User Attitudes' Trial.. PubMed. 246. 24–28. 3 indexed citations
4.
Cosgrove, Victoria E., Emma Gliddon, Lesley Berk, et al.. (2017). Online ethics: where will the interface of mental health and the internet lead us?. International Journal of Bipolar Disorders. 5(1). 26–26. 14 indexed citations
5.
Lauder, Sue, Victoria E. Cosgrove, Emma Gliddon, et al.. (2017). Progressing MoodSwings. The upgrade and evaluation of MoodSwings 2.0: An online intervention for bipolar disorder. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 56. 18–24. 8 indexed citations
6.
Gliddon, Emma, Sue Lauder, Lesley Berk, et al.. (2015). Evaluating discussion board engagement in the MoodSwings online self-help program for bipolar disorder: protocol for an observational prospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 15(1). 243–243. 9 indexed citations
7.
Turner, Alyna, Sue Lauder, Lesley Berk, et al.. (2015). A brief review of exercise, bipolar disorder, and mechanistic pathways. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 147–147. 50 indexed citations
8.
Lauder, Sue, Andrea Chester, David Castle, et al.. (2014). A randomized head to head trial of MoodSwings.net.au: An internet based self-help program for bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 171. 13–21. 69 indexed citations
9.
Fischer, E., et al.. (2013). An online intervention for bipolar disorder Moodswings 2.0: www.moodswings.net.au. 97–97. 2 indexed citations
10.
Lauder, Sue, Andrea Chester, David Castle, et al.. (2012). Development of an online intervention for bipolar disorder. www.moodswings.net.au. Psychology Health & Medicine. 18(2). 155–165. 27 indexed citations
11.
Lauder, Sue, Michael Berk, David Castle, et al.. (2011). Uptake and outcomes: www.moodswings.net.au. Results of an online self-help intervention for bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders. 13. 65–65.
12.
Martin, Paul R., et al.. (2011). A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Social Support Intervention. Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being. 3(1). 44–65. 15 indexed citations
13.
Castle, David, Carolynne White, Michael Berk, et al.. (2010). Group-based psychosocial intervention for bipolar disorder: randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 196(5). 383–388. 87 indexed citations
14.
Lauder, Sue, Michael Berk, David Castle, Seetal Dodd, & Lesley Berk. (2010). The role of psychotherapy in bipolar disorder. The Medical Journal of Australia. 193(S4). S31–5. 30 indexed citations
15.
Castle, David, Lesley Berk, Sue Lauder, Michael Berk, & Greg Murray. (2009). Psychosocial interventions for bipolar disorder. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 21(6). 275–284. 12 indexed citations
16.
Lauder, Sue, Michael Berk, David Castle, et al.. (2008). www.moodswings : The highs and lows of an online intervention for bipolar disorder - preliminary findings. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 42. 7 indexed citations
17.
Berk, Michael, et al.. (2008). To E or not to E? The case for electronic health records. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 20(2). 104–106. 2 indexed citations
18.
Castle, David, et al.. (2007). Pilot of group intervention for bipolar disorder. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. 11(4). 279–284. 20 indexed citations
19.
Lauder, Sue, Andrea Chester, & Michael Berk. (2007). Net-effect? Online psychological interventions. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 19(6). 386–388. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026