Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume

3.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Clinical Psychology, 1 paper in Epidemiology and 1 paper in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume's work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper). Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume is often cited by papers focused on Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper). Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume collaborates with scholars based in . Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume's co-authors include Cloninger Cr and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Studies on Alcohol.

In The Last Decade

Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume

5 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers

1987 2.4k citations Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume et al. American Journal of Psychiatry profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume	4	2.3k	484	252	179	170	5	2.5k
Namrata Raylu Australia	19	1.9k 0.8×	290 0.6×	128 0.5×	215 1.2×	208 1.2×	29	2.1k
Marvin A. Steinberg United States	24	1.9k 0.8×	388 0.8×	250 1.0×	276 1.5×	74 0.4×	38	2.1k
Mark Dickerson Australia	20	1.2k 0.5×	166 0.3×	83 0.3×	126 0.7×	160 0.9×	35	1.3k
Caroline Sylvain Canada	11	1.4k 0.6×	329 0.7×	117 0.5×	95 0.5×	130 0.8×	13	1.5k
Durand F. Jacobs United States	15	1.2k 0.5×	137 0.3×	153 0.6×	207 1.2×	138 0.8×	22	1.4k
Loreen Rugle United States	21	1.3k 0.6×	356 0.7×	228 0.9×	171 1.0×	43 0.3×	34	1.7k
Mónica Gómez‐Peña Spain	30	2.2k 1.0×	455 0.9×	102 0.4×	367 2.1×	73 0.4×	103	2.5k
Darren R. Christensen Canada	17	720 0.3×	194 0.4×	166 0.7×	96 0.5×	74 0.4×	41	1.1k
Francine Ferland Canada	18	975 0.4×	150 0.3×	216 0.9×	144 0.8×	60 0.4×	67	1.3k
Jean-Marie Boisvert Canada	14	1.1k 0.5×	219 0.5×	132 0.5×	122 0.7×	49 0.3×	28	1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume. The network helps show where Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume. Stuttgart-Hohenheim Blume is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Cr, Cloninger, et al.. (2005). Temperament and character in a Swiss sample of patients diagnosed with pathological gambling disorder: A preliminary investigation. 2 indexed citations

2.

Blume, Stuttgart-Hohenheim, et al.. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry. 144(9). 1184–1188. 2421 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Blume, Stuttgart-Hohenheim. (1986). Women and alcohol. A review. JAMA. 256(11). 1467–1470. 46 indexed citations

4.

Blume, Stuttgart-Hohenheim. (1986). Excessive Appetites: A Psychological View of Addictions. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 47(3). 262–263. 59 indexed citations

5.

Blume, Stuttgart-Hohenheim. (1981). Changing the federal regulations on confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records: views of clinical staff.. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 42(3). 344–349. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact