Stuart Smith

5.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
82 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Stuart Smith is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart Smith has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 21 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 20 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Stuart Smith's work include Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (28 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (20 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (19 papers). Stuart Smith is often cited by papers focused on Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (28 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (20 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (19 papers). Stuart Smith collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Stuart Smith's co-authors include Stephen R. Lord, Daniel Schoene, Kim Delbaere, Jasmine C. Menant, HH Bülthoff, Jennifer L. Campos, Thomas A. Davies, John S. Butler, A. Stefanie Mikolaizak and Giuseppe Pichierri and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, PLoS ONE and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Stuart Smith

80 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

Discriminative Ability and Predictive Validity of the Tim... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart Smith Australia 31 1.0k 806 679 586 584 82 3.5k
Anne Felicia Ambrose United States 13 1.4k 1.4× 1.6k 1.9× 537 0.8× 375 0.6× 357 0.6× 39 3.7k
Beatrix Vereijken Norway 34 766 0.8× 785 1.0× 273 0.4× 340 0.6× 957 1.6× 111 3.9k
Alan Godfrey United Kingdom 35 1.8k 1.8× 837 1.0× 464 0.7× 370 0.6× 267 0.5× 146 4.9k
May‐Kuen Wong Taiwan 43 1.6k 1.6× 1.5k 1.9× 263 0.4× 1.7k 2.9× 550 0.9× 254 7.0k
Michael A. Hunt Canada 46 1.1k 1.1× 673 0.8× 267 0.4× 462 0.8× 224 0.4× 181 7.9k
Pertti Era Finland 37 2.1k 2.0× 1.2k 1.5× 535 0.8× 385 0.7× 616 1.1× 83 5.1k
Claudine J. C. Lamoth Netherlands 40 2.6k 2.5× 1.6k 1.9× 431 0.6× 832 1.4× 943 1.6× 126 5.7k
Malcolm Granat United Kingdom 42 937 0.9× 1.1k 1.4× 1.5k 2.2× 1.1k 1.9× 473 0.8× 165 7.1k
Alison H. McGregor United Kingdom 43 368 0.4× 300 0.4× 363 0.5× 335 0.6× 446 0.8× 246 6.0k
Brian Caulfield Ireland 45 940 0.9× 504 0.6× 452 0.7× 443 0.8× 126 0.2× 229 7.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Smith. The network helps show where Stuart Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Smith. Stuart Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Shinners, Lucy, Christina Aggar, Sandra Grace, & Stuart Smith. (2021). Exploring healthcare professionals’ perceptions of artificial intelligence: Validating a questionnaire using the e-Delphi method. Digital Health. 7. 569647145–569647145. 40 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Stuart. (2020). The binomial coefficient \(C\binom{n}{x}\) for arbitrary \(x\). 1–34. 1 indexed citations
3.
Mandrusiak, Allison, et al.. (2020). A Co-Designed Active Video Game for Physical Activity Promotion in People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Pilot Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 9(1). e23069–e23069. 12 indexed citations
4.
Sherrington, Catherine, Leanne Hassett, Maayken van den Berg, et al.. (2018). The effectiveness of affordable technology in rehabilitation to improve mobility and physical activity: Amount (activity and mobility using technology) rehabilitation trial. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 61. e86–e86. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rantalainen, Timo, Makii Muthalib, Liam Johnson, et al.. (2018). Concurrent exergaming and transcranial direct current stimulation to improve balance in people with Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 19(1). 387–387. 19 indexed citations
8.
Schoene, Daniel, Trinidad Valenzuela, Barbara Toson, et al.. (2015). Interactive Cognitive-Motor Step Training Improves Cognitive Risk Factors of Falling in Older Adults – A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS ONE. 10(12). e0145161–e0145161. 122 indexed citations
9.
10.
Schoene, Daniel, Stuart Smith, Kim Delbaere, & Stephen R. Lord. (2012). Poor performance in a test of selective attention, response inhibition and stepping is associated with falls in older people. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 20. 2 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Stuart, Kim Delbaere, & Stephen R. Lord. (2012). Home-based exergaming: an effective fall preventive measure for the elderly. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 20(5). 5. 1 indexed citations
12.
Butler, John S., Jennifer L. Campos, HH Bülthoff, & Stuart Smith. (2011). The Role of Stereo Vision in Visual–Vestibular Integration. PubMed. 24(5). 453–470. 47 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Stuart, et al.. (2009). Detailed analysis of peripheral blood natural killer (NK) cells in women with recurrent miscarriage. Human Reproduction. 25(1). 52–58. 120 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Stuart, et al.. (2006). Visual Vestibular Interactions for Self Motion Estimation. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1–10. 4 indexed citations
15.
Daini, Roberta, Peter Wenderoth, & Stuart Smith. (2003). Visual orientation illusions: Global mechanisms involved in hierarchical effects and frames of reference. Perception & Psychophysics. 65(5). 770–778. 7 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Stuart, Peter Wenderoth, & Rick van der Zwan. (2001). Orientation processing mechanisms revealed by the plaid tilt illusion. Vision Research. 41(4). 483–494. 3 indexed citations
17.
Clifford, Colin W. G., Anna Ma-Wyatt, Derek H. Arnold, Stuart Smith, & Peter Wenderoth. (2001). Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination. Vision Research. 41(2). 151–159. 80 indexed citations
18.
Wenderoth, Peter & Stuart Smith. (1999). Neural substrates of the tilt illusion. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology. 27(3-4). 271–274. 10 indexed citations
19.
Moore, Steven T., Thomas Haslwanter, Ian S. Curthoys, & Stuart Smith. (1996). A geometric basis for measurement of three-dimensional eye position using image processing. Vision Research. 36(3). 445–459. 88 indexed citations
20.
Curthoys, Ian S., et al.. (1994). Video Procedures for the Measurement and Display of the Three Dimensions of Eye movements. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026