Stuart R. Borrett

2.5k total citations
51 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Stuart R. Borrett is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart R. Borrett has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Environmental Engineering, 30 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 14 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Stuart R. Borrett's work include Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis (30 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (22 papers) and Marine and coastal ecosystems (8 papers). Stuart R. Borrett is often cited by papers focused on Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis (30 papers), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (22 papers) and Marine and coastal ecosystems (8 papers). Stuart R. Borrett collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Stuart R. Borrett's co-authors include Brian D. Fath, Bernard C. Patten, Matthew K. Lau, James Moody, Stuart J. Whipple, David E. Hines, John R. Schramski, David K. Gattie, Ursula M. Scharler and Laura Sheble and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Stuart R. Borrett

51 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart R. Borrett United States 26 903 715 535 264 209 51 1.8k
Cristina Bondavalli Italy 17 419 0.5× 337 0.5× 366 0.7× 150 0.6× 227 1.1× 27 1.0k
Ursula M. Scharler South Africa 20 536 0.6× 576 0.8× 633 1.2× 79 0.3× 304 1.5× 57 1.4k
Antonio Bodini Italy 21 329 0.4× 370 0.5× 393 0.7× 323 1.2× 101 0.5× 52 1.3k
Gary N. Geller United States 22 324 0.4× 846 1.2× 773 1.4× 233 0.9× 63 0.3× 35 2.2k
Ruchi Badola India 24 422 0.5× 1.0k 1.4× 1.3k 2.5× 116 0.4× 86 0.4× 83 2.7k
Xuefeng Cui China 28 284 0.3× 1.2k 1.7× 529 1.0× 216 0.8× 63 0.3× 78 2.2k
Pedro A. Aguilera Spain 23 305 0.3× 1.2k 1.6× 422 0.8× 123 0.5× 112 0.5× 78 2.4k
Corinna Gries United States 26 313 0.3× 1.0k 1.4× 664 1.2× 1.0k 4.0× 69 0.3× 67 3.1k
Domingo Alcaraz‐Segura Spain 28 462 0.5× 1.3k 1.8× 1.2k 2.3× 102 0.4× 58 0.3× 86 2.4k
Karen E. Joyce Australia 25 334 0.4× 690 1.0× 1.2k 2.3× 34 0.1× 401 1.9× 64 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart R. Borrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart R. Borrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart R. Borrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart R. Borrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart R. Borrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart R. Borrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart R. Borrett. The network helps show where Stuart R. Borrett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart R. Borrett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart R. Borrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart R. Borrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart R. Borrett. Stuart R. Borrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Buzhdygan, Oksana Y., Britta Tietjen, Jana S. Petermann, et al.. (2025). Plant diversity facets differentially affect energy dynamics in grasslands depending on trophic contexts. Ecological Monographs. 95(1). 2 indexed citations
2.
Niquil, Nathalie, et al.. (2020). Shifting levels of ecological network's analysis reveals different system properties. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 375(1796). 20190326–20190326. 22 indexed citations
3.
Bentley, Jacob W., David E. Hines, Stuart R. Borrett, et al.. (2019). Combining scientific and fishers’ knowledge to co-create indicators of food web structure and function. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 25 indexed citations
4.
Lau, Matthew K., Stuart R. Borrett, Benjamin Baiser, Nicholas J. Gotelli, & Aaron M. Ellison. (2017). Ecological network metrics: opportunities for synthesis. Ecosphere. 8(8). 79 indexed citations
5.
Hines, David E., et al.. (2015). Estimating the effects of seawater intrusion on an estuarine nitrogen cycle by comparative network analysis. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 25 indexed citations
6.
Abbott, Karen C., Justine Karst, Lori Biederman, et al.. (2015). Spatial Heterogeneity in Soil Microbes Alters Outcomes of Plant Competition. PLoS ONE. 10(5). e0125788–e0125788. 29 indexed citations
7.
Lau, Matthew K., Arthur R. Keith, Stuart R. Borrett, Stephen M. Shuster, & Thomas G. Whitham. (2015). Genotypic variation in foundation species generates network structure that may drive community dynamics and evolution. Ecology. 3 indexed citations
8.
Borrett, Stuart R.. (2013). Throughflow centrality is a global indicator of the functional importance of species in ecosystems. Ecological Indicators. 32. 182–196. 57 indexed citations
9.
Borrett, Stuart R., et al.. (2011). Environ centrality reveals the tendency of indirect effects to homogenize the functional importance of species in ecosystems. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 294. 74–86. 12 indexed citations
10.
Borrett, Stuart R., et al.. (2011). Evidence for the dominance of indirect effects in 50 trophic ecosystem networks. Ecological Modelling. 222(5). 1192–1204. 44 indexed citations
11.
Borrett, Stuart R., et al.. (2011). Equivalence of the realized input and output oriented indirect effects metrics in Ecological Network Analysis. Ecological Modelling. 222(13). 2142–2148. 10 indexed citations
12.
Borrett, Stuart R., et al.. (2010). Evidence for resource homogenization in 50 trophic ecosystem networks. Ecological Modelling. 221(13-14). 1710–1716. 21 indexed citations
13.
Borrett, Stuart R., et al.. (2010). Reconnecting environs to their environment. Ecological Modelling. 222(14). 2393–2403. 13 indexed citations
14.
Borrett, Stuart R., et al.. (2010). Ecosystem network analysis indicators are generally robust to parameter uncertainty in a phosphorus model of Lake Sidney Lanier, USA. Ecological Modelling. 221(8). 1230–1238. 39 indexed citations
15.
Bridewell, Will, Stuart R. Borrett, & Ljupčo Todorovski. (2007). Extracting constraints for process modeling. 87–94. 3 indexed citations
17.
Borrett, Stuart R., et al.. (2007). Equivalence of throughflow- and storage-based environs. Ecological Modelling. 206(3-4). 400–406. 8 indexed citations
18.
Borrett, Stuart R., Brian D. Fath, & Bernard C. Patten. (2006). Functional integration of ecological networks through pathway proliferation. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 245(1). 98–111. 72 indexed citations
19.
Nejstgaard, Jens C., Marc E. Frischer, PG Verity, et al.. (2006). Plankton development and trophic transfer in seawater enclosures with nutrients and Phaeocystis pouchetii added. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 321. 99–121. 34 indexed citations
20.
Beck, M.B., Brian D. Fath, Amber Parker, et al.. (2002). Developing a Concept of Adaptive Community Learning: Case Study of a Rapidly Urbanizing Watershed. 3(4). 299–307. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026