Stuart M. Whitten

1.8k total citations
69 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Stuart M. Whitten is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Ocean Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart M. Whitten has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 26 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 19 papers in Ocean Engineering. Recurrent topics in Stuart M. Whitten's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (33 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (21 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (17 papers). Stuart M. Whitten is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (33 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (21 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (17 papers). Stuart M. Whitten collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Stuart M. Whitten's co-authors include Anthea Coggan, Jeff Bennett, Frederieke J. Kroon, Jeff Bennett, Britta Schaffelke, Peter J. Thorburn, Jill Windle, Andrew Reeson, John Rolfe and Dustin Garrick and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Global Change Biology and Ecological Economics.

In The Last Decade

Stuart M. Whitten

67 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart M. Whitten Australia 18 557 502 321 247 196 69 1.3k
José Miguel Martínez Paz Spain 25 578 1.0× 610 1.2× 292 0.9× 257 1.0× 174 0.9× 98 1.8k
Michael D. Young Australia 22 286 0.5× 492 1.0× 299 0.9× 319 1.3× 222 1.1× 61 1.3k
Berit Hasler Denmark 23 846 1.5× 627 1.2× 419 1.3× 176 0.7× 286 1.5× 75 1.9k
Richard T. Woodward United States 23 1.2k 2.1× 672 1.3× 497 1.5× 264 1.1× 246 1.3× 74 2.1k
Darla Hatton MacDonald Australia 23 650 1.2× 972 1.9× 304 0.9× 324 1.3× 192 1.0× 103 1.8k
Md Sayed Iftekhar Australia 25 429 0.8× 865 1.7× 300 0.9× 155 0.6× 547 2.8× 104 1.8k
Hans‐Peter Weikard Netherlands 22 733 1.3× 306 0.6× 161 0.5× 176 0.7× 112 0.6× 104 1.5k
Jiancheng Chen China 19 423 0.8× 461 0.9× 157 0.5× 67 0.3× 186 0.9× 76 1.2k
Christian Langpap United States 19 584 1.0× 447 0.9× 142 0.4× 102 0.4× 146 0.7× 40 1.1k
Joseph Alcamo Germany 16 222 0.4× 747 1.5× 172 0.5× 190 0.8× 242 1.2× 40 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart M. Whitten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart M. Whitten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart M. Whitten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart M. Whitten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart M. Whitten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart M. Whitten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart M. Whitten. The network helps show where Stuart M. Whitten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart M. Whitten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart M. Whitten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart M. Whitten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart M. Whitten. Stuart M. Whitten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schandl, Heinz, Andrea Walton, Sandy Oliver, Guy Barnett, & Stuart M. Whitten. (2025). Navigating sustainability transitions: A science for policy approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 58. 385–395. 3 indexed citations
3.
Moallemi, Enayat A., Michael Battaglia, Jody Bruce, et al.. (2024). Coupling net-zero modeling with sustainability transitions can reveal co-benefits and risks. One Earth. 7(2). 175–179. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ponce‐Reyes, Rocío, Jennifer Firn, Sam Nicol, et al.. (2019). Building a stakeholder-led common vision increases the expected cost-effectiveness of biodiversity conservation. PLoS ONE. 14(6). e0218093–e0218093. 9 indexed citations
5.
Whitten, Stuart M., Tobias Wünscher, & Jason F. Shogren. (2017). Conservation tenders in developed and developing countries − status quo, challenges and prospects. Land Use Policy. 63. 552–560. 16 indexed citations
6.
Rolfe, John, Stuart M. Whitten, & Jill Windle. (2017). The Australian experience in using tenders for conservation. Land Use Policy. 63. 611–620. 45 indexed citations
7.
Coggan, Anthea, Edwin Buitelaar, Stuart M. Whitten, & Jeff Bennett. (2013). Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why?. Ecological Economics. 88. 222–231. 79 indexed citations
8.
Coggan, Anthea, Edwin Buitelaar, Jeff Bennett, & Stuart M. Whitten. (2013). Transferable Mitigation of Environmental Impacts of Development: Two Cases of Offsets in Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. 15(2). 303–322. 9 indexed citations
9.
Whitten, Stuart M., Andrew Reeson, Jill Windle, & John Rolfe. (2012). Designing conservation tenders to support landholder participation: A framework and case study assessment. Ecosystem Services. 6. 82–92. 55 indexed citations
10.
Grieken, M.E. Van, Peter Roebeling, Iris Bohnet, Stuart M. Whitten, & A. J. F. Webster. (2012). Economic incentive-based instruments for the adoption of management options for water quality improvement in heterogeneous sugarcane farming communities. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 3 indexed citations
11.
Higgins, Andrew, et al.. (2011). An optimisation modelling approach to seasonal resource allocation for planned burning. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 20(2). 175–183. 10 indexed citations
12.
Reeson, Andrew, Kristen J. Williams, & Stuart M. Whitten. (2011). Targeting Enhanced Spatial Configuration in Biodiversity Conservation Incentive Payment Programs. 3 indexed citations
13.
Marlow, David, Leonie Pearson, Darla Hatton MacDonald, Stuart M. Whitten, & Stewart Burn. (2011). A framework for considering externalities in urban water asset management. Water Science & Technology. 64(11). 2199–2206. 18 indexed citations
14.
Marlow, David, et al.. (2010). Linking asset management to sustainability through risk concepts: the role of externalities. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
15.
Straton, Anna & Stuart M. Whitten. (2009). Putting a value on ecosystem goods and services. 2009(148). 17–17. 1 indexed citations
16.
Whitten, Stuart M. & David P. Shelton. (2005). Market for Ecosystem Services in Australia: practical design and case studies #. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech). 13 indexed citations
17.
Rolfe, John, et al.. (2004). Designing experiments to test auction procedures. Figshare. 1 indexed citations
18.
Whitten, Stuart M., et al.. (2004). A BIO-ECONOMIC MODEL OF WETLAND PROTECTION ON PRIVATE LANDS. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
19.
Whitten, Stuart M. & Jeff Bennett. (2002). A Travel Cost Study of Duck Hunting in the Upper South East of South Australia. Australian Geographer. 33(2). 207–221. 35 indexed citations
20.
Whitten, Stuart M. & Jeff Bennett. (2000). Private and social values of wetlands : research report. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026