Stuart Lucas

612 total citations
20 papers, 488 citations indexed

About

Stuart Lucas is a scholar working on Polymers and Plastics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart Lucas has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 488 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Polymers and Plastics, 7 papers in Materials Chemistry and 6 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Stuart Lucas's work include Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (5 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (5 papers) and Textile materials and evaluations (5 papers). Stuart Lucas is often cited by papers focused on Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (5 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (5 papers) and Textile materials and evaluations (5 papers). Stuart Lucas collaborates with scholars based in Australia, China and United States. Stuart Lucas's co-authors include William Humphries, Chi Huynh, Canh‐Dung Tran, Jill McDonnell, Jackie Y. Cai, Jie Min, Richard Helmer, Christopher D. Easton, Damian Farrow and Geoffrey RS Naylor and has published in prestigious journals such as Carbon, The International Journal of Robotics Research and Nanotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Stuart Lucas

20 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart Lucas Australia 10 262 183 157 130 46 20 488
Zafar Abas South Korea 8 96 0.4× 325 1.8× 134 0.9× 88 0.7× 31 0.7× 11 677
Danli Luo United States 15 87 0.3× 181 1.0× 225 1.4× 88 0.7× 19 0.4× 26 541
Xianghao Meng China 11 112 0.4× 130 0.7× 132 0.8× 85 0.7× 111 2.4× 19 443
Mohammad Hamidul Islam United Kingdom 6 105 0.4× 176 1.0× 74 0.5× 194 1.5× 40 0.9× 11 402
Boyeon Hwang South Korea 9 72 0.3× 122 0.7× 71 0.5× 203 1.6× 43 0.9× 11 386
Soo‐Hwan Jang United States 9 161 0.6× 312 1.7× 123 0.8× 166 1.3× 13 0.3× 11 827
Mingyang Yan China 15 367 1.4× 584 3.2× 159 1.0× 145 1.1× 18 0.4× 25 837
Arobindo Chatterjee India 15 144 0.5× 295 1.6× 87 0.6× 474 3.6× 56 1.2× 37 694
Youngpyo Ko South Korea 11 186 0.7× 326 1.8× 58 0.4× 154 1.2× 9 0.2× 14 480
Federica Sordo Switzerland 9 119 0.5× 222 1.2× 77 0.5× 238 1.8× 14 0.3× 12 534

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Lucas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Lucas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Lucas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Lucas. The network helps show where Stuart Lucas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Lucas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Lucas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Lucas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Lucas. Stuart Lucas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gohery, Scott, Navid Moslemi, Behzad Abdi, et al.. (2021). A semi-empirical approach to evaluate the effect of constituent materials on mechanical strengths of GFRP mortar pipes. Structures. 36. 493–510. 5 indexed citations
2.
Gohery, Scott, et al.. (2020). Mechanical characterization of particulated FRP composite pipes: A comprehensive experimental study. Polymer Testing. 93. 107001–107001. 34 indexed citations
3.
Huson, Mickey G., et al.. (2019). Determination of the transverse modulus of cylindrical samples by compression between two parallel flat plates. SN Applied Sciences. 1(7). 5 indexed citations
4.
Feng, Chunfang, Zhifeng Yi, Ludovic F. Dumée, et al.. (2015). Shrinkage induced stretchable micro-wrinkled reduced graphene oxide composite with recoverable conductivity. Carbon. 93. 878–886. 46 indexed citations
5.
Dumée, Ludovic F., Kallista Sears, Stephen Mudie, et al.. (2013). Characterization of carbon nanotube webs and yarns with small angle X-ray scattering: Revealing the yarn twist and inter-nanotube interactions and alignment. Carbon. 63. 562–566. 29 indexed citations
6.
Min, Jie, Jackie Y. Cai, Christopher D. Easton, et al.. (2012). High performance carbon nanotube spun yarns from a crosslinked network. Carbon. 52. 520–527. 44 indexed citations
7.
Cai, Jackie Y., Jie Min, Jill McDonnell, et al.. (2012). An improved method for functionalisation of carbon nanotube spun yarns with aryldiazonium compounds. Carbon. 50(12). 4655–4662. 43 indexed citations
8.
Lucas, Stuart, et al.. (2011). Manufacturing polymer/carbon nanotube composite using a novel direct process. Nanotechnology. 22(14). 145302–145302. 26 indexed citations
9.
Cai, Jackie Y., Stuart Lucas, Lijing Wang, & Yi Cao. (2011). Insulation Properties of the Monolithic and Flexible Aerogels Prepared at Ambient Pressure. Advanced materials research. 391-392. 116–120. 9 indexed citations
10.
Helmer, Richard, et al.. (2011). Signal processing for valid score determination in amateur boxing. Procedia Engineering. 13. 481–486. 5 indexed citations
11.
Héquet, Eric, et al.. (2011). Precision of the upgraded CottonscanTM instrument for measuring the average fiber linear density (fineness) of cotton lint samples. Textile Research Journal. 81(20). 2180–2183. 3 indexed citations
12.
Lucas, Stuart, et al.. (2011). An upgraded CottonscanTM instrument for measuring the average fiber linear density (fineness) of cotton lint samples. Textile Research Journal. 81(7). 683–689. 6 indexed citations
13.
Helmer, Richard, et al.. (2010). Can interactive textiles influence a novice’s throwing technique?. Procedia Engineering. 2(2). 2985–2990. 11 indexed citations
14.
Jennings, Mark, et al.. (2010). Instrumentation of a field hockey stick to detect stick and ball interaction during a drag flick. Procedia Engineering. 2(2). 2979–2984. 8 indexed citations
15.
Héquet, Eric, et al.. (2010). Performance of the CottonscanTM instrument for measuring the average fiber linear density (fineness) of cotton lint samples. Textile Research Journal. 81(1). 94–100. 7 indexed citations
16.
Long, Robert L., et al.. (2009). An Instrument for Determining the Average Fiber Linear Density (Fineness) of Cotton Lint Samples. Textile Research Journal. 80(9). 822–833. 24 indexed citations
17.
Tran, Canh‐Dung, et al.. (2009). Improving the tensile strength of carbon nanotube spun yarns using a modified spinning process. Carbon. 47(11). 2662–2670. 144 indexed citations
18.
Helmer, Richard, et al.. (2008). Smart Textiles: Position and Motion Sensing for Sport, Entertainment and Rehabilitation. Advances in science and technology. 60. 144–153. 29 indexed citations
19.
Lucas, Stuart, et al.. (2007). Inter-laboratory evaluation of the Cottonscan instrument for determining average fibre linear density (fineness) of cotton lint samples.. 1 indexed citations
20.
Lucas, Stuart, et al.. (2000). Real-Time Solution of the Inverse Kinematic-Rate Problem. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 19(12). 1236–1244. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026