Stuart D. Card

1.7k total citations
50 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Stuart D. Card is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart D. Card has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 23 papers in Plant Science and 14 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Stuart D. Card's work include Plant and fungal interactions (37 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (19 papers) and Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (14 papers). Stuart D. Card is often cited by papers focused on Plant and fungal interactions (37 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (19 papers) and Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (14 papers). Stuart D. Card collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Argentina and Canada. Stuart D. Card's co-authors include Linda J. Johnson, J. R. Caradus, D.E. Hume, Daniel A. Bastías, G. R. G. Clover, M. N. Pearson, Wade J. Mace, Richard D. Johnson, Christine R. Voisey and Wayne R. Simpson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Stuart D. Card

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart D. Card New Zealand 17 663 648 311 294 170 50 1.2k
Carl H. Mesarich New Zealand 21 274 0.4× 1.4k 2.2× 380 1.2× 587 2.0× 78 0.5× 52 1.6k
L. M. Carris United States 21 289 0.4× 1.0k 1.6× 388 1.2× 803 2.7× 115 0.7× 75 1.3k
Wayne R. Simpson New Zealand 17 942 1.4× 444 0.7× 474 1.5× 213 0.7× 68 0.4× 42 1.2k
Marshall Bergen United States 21 274 0.4× 1.1k 1.6× 350 1.1× 419 1.4× 63 0.4× 29 1.3k
Robert P. Doss United States 17 367 0.6× 712 1.1× 303 1.0× 257 0.9× 341 2.0× 67 1.0k
Michael J. Christensen New Zealand 24 1.6k 2.4× 1.2k 1.8× 664 2.1× 495 1.7× 72 0.4× 56 2.2k
J. R. COLEY‐SMITH United Kingdom 21 338 0.5× 1.5k 2.2× 281 0.9× 655 2.2× 73 0.4× 73 1.6k
Régis Courtecuisse France 17 310 0.5× 904 1.4× 197 0.6× 491 1.7× 221 1.3× 45 1.2k
Gerhard Kost Germany 16 254 0.4× 1.1k 1.7× 310 1.0× 447 1.5× 81 0.5× 37 1.2k
Louise Larissa May De Mio Brazil 21 484 0.7× 1.5k 2.4× 473 1.5× 869 3.0× 82 0.5× 193 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart D. Card

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart D. Card's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart D. Card with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart D. Card more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart D. Card

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart D. Card. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart D. Card. The network helps show where Stuart D. Card may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart D. Card

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart D. Card. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart D. Card based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart D. Card. Stuart D. Card is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gundel, Pedro E., Ruy Jáuregui, Stuart D. Card, et al.. (2024). The growth promotion in endophyte symbiotic plants does not penalise the resistance to herbivores and bacterial microbiota. Plant Cell & Environment. 47(8). 2865–2878. 6 indexed citations
2.
Card, Stuart D., et al.. (2024). Epichloë – a key element of New Zealand’s agricultural landscape. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 62(2-3). 519–547. 6 indexed citations
3.
Zhang, Wei, Christina D. Moon, Paul Maclean, et al.. (2022). Epichloë seed transmission efficiency is influenced by plant defense response mechanisms. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13. 1025698–1025698. 3 indexed citations
4.
Biganzoli, Fernando, et al.. (2022). Can Aphid Herbivory Induce Intergenerational Effects of Endophyte-conferred Resistance in Grasses?. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 48(11-12). 867–881. 4 indexed citations
5.
6.
Carvalhais, Lília C., et al.. (2021). Simple solution to preserve plant samples for microbiome analyses. Molecular Ecology Resources. 22(3). 1055–1064. 3 indexed citations
7.
Caradus, J. R., Stuart D. Card, Sarah C. Finch, et al.. (2020). Ergot alkaloids in New Zealand pastures and their impact. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 65(1). 1–41. 26 indexed citations
8.
Millner, James P., et al.. (2020). Methylobacterium , a major component of the culturable bacterial endophyte community of wild Brassica seed. PeerJ. 8. e9514–e9514. 20 indexed citations
9.
Hampton, J. G., et al.. (2020). A Tale of Two Grass Species: Temperature Affects the Symbiosis of a Mutualistic Epichloë Endophyte in Both Tall Fescue and Perennial Ryegrass. Frontiers in Plant Science. 11. 530–530. 16 indexed citations
10.
Zhou, Yong, Xia Li, Hui Liu, et al.. (2019). Effects of endophyte infection on the competitive ability of Achnatherum sibiricum depend on endophyte species and nitrogen availability. Journal of Plant Ecology. 12(5). 815–824. 8 indexed citations
11.
Bastías, Daniel A., Linda J. Johnson, & Stuart D. Card. (2019). Symbiotic bacteria of plant-associated fungi: friends or foes?. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 56. 1–8. 38 indexed citations
12.
McGill, Craig, et al.. (2017). Epichloë fungal endophyte colonisation and seed quality in developing grass florets – effect of different fertiliser applications. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 61(1). 27–41. 2 indexed citations
13.
Bastías, Daniel A., M. Alejandra Martínez‐Ghersa, Jonathan A. Newman, et al.. (2017). The plant hormone salicylic acid interacts with the mechanism of anti‐herbivory conferred by fungal endophytes in grasses. Plant Cell & Environment. 41(2). 395–405. 59 indexed citations
14.
15.
Voisey, Christine R., Linda J. Johnson, Gregory T. Bryan, et al.. (2016). cAMP Signaling Regulates Synchronised Growth of Symbiotic Epichloë Fungi with the Host Grass Lolium perenne. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7. 1546–1546. 16 indexed citations
16.
Card, Stuart D., et al.. (2016). Deciphering endophyte behaviour: the link between endophyte biology and efficacious biological control agents. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 92(8). fiw114–fiw114. 153 indexed citations
17.
Popay, Alison J., et al.. (2015). Avanex Unique Endophyte Technology: Reduced Insect Food Source at Airports. Environmental Entomology. 45(1). 101–108. 11 indexed citations
18.
Johnson, Linda J., Lyn Briggs, J. R. Caradus, et al.. (2013). The exploitation of epichloae endophytes for agricultural benefit. Fungal Diversity. 60(1). 171–188. 206 indexed citations
19.
Hume, D.E., Stuart D. Card, & M.P. Rolston. (2013). Effects of Storage Conditions on Endophyte and Seed Viability in Pasture Grasses. UKnowledge (University of Kentucky). 405–408. 15 indexed citations
20.
Card, Stuart D., et al.. (2011). Fungal endophyte detection in pasture grass seed utilising the infection layer and comparison to other detection techniques. Seed Science and Technology. 39(3). 581–592. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026