Steven Peil
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 10%
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Co-authors
- G. GabrielseS. L. RolstonJ. V. PortoM. V. SubbotinWilliam D. PhillipsB. E. KingChristopher R. EkstromB. Laburthe-Tolra
- Topics
- Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (20 papers)Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (16 papers)Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (14 papers)
- Cited by
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsArtificial IntelligenceStatistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaGermany
In The Last Decade
Steven Peil
25 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 405
- Artificial Intelligence 126
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 45
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 27
- Condensed Matter Physics 27
Countries citing papers authored by Steven Peil
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Peil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Peil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Peil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Peil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Peil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Peil. The network helps show where Steven Peil may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Peil
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Peil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Peil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Peil. Steven Peil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Performance and Applications of an Ensemble of Atomic Fountains | 1 |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 168 | |
| 19 | Quantum jumps between Fock states of an ultracold electron cyclotron oscillator | 3 |
| 20 | 120 |
About Steven Peil
Steven Peil is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 28 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (20 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (16 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (405 citations), Artificial Intelligence (126 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (27 citations). Steven Peil has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G. Gabrielse, S. L. Rolston, J. V. Porto, M. V. Subbotin, William D. Phillips, B. E. King, Christopher R. Ekstrom, B. Laburthe-Tolra, John Obrecht and S. G. Crane. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and Optics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.