Steven Hogg

596 total citations
2 papers, 15 citations indexed

About

Steven Hogg is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ecology and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven Hogg has authored 2 papers receiving a total of 15 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1 paper in Ecology and 1 paper in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Steven Hogg's work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper), Avian ecology and behavior (1 paper) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1 paper). Steven Hogg is often cited by papers focused on Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper), Avian ecology and behavior (1 paper) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1 paper). Steven Hogg collaborates with scholars based in Sweden and United States. Steven Hogg's co-authors include Gus Ferguson, David Gibson and Kenneth L. Petersen and has published in prestigious journals such as Virtual Reality and Journal of Raptor Research.

In The Last Decade

Steven Hogg

2 papers receiving 15 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Steven Hogg Sweden	2	4	3	3	2	2	2	15
Xier Chen China	3	2 0.5×	3 1.0×				3	7
John Edward Taylor United States	2	3 0.8×			3 1.5×	2 1.0×	9	12
Jana Hořáková Czechia	3		4 1.3×	3 1.0×		2 1.0×	16	24
Amy Choi Canada	2	4 1.0×			2 1.0×		2	5
Caroline Antolik United States	2	3 0.8×			2 1.0×		2	6
Diana Askarizadeh Iran	2	3 0.8×			2 1.0×		5	6
C. O. Whitman	1	5 1.3×				2 1.0×	2	6
Kathryn Allison United Kingdom	2	4 1.0×			3 1.5×		2	10
Shannon M. Schlater United States	2	5 1.3×			2 1.0×		2	6
Long Hua	2	3 0.8×			2 1.0×		2	5

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Hogg

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Hogg

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Hogg. The network helps show where Steven Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Hogg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Hogg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Hogg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Hogg. Steven Hogg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

2 of 2 papers shown

1.

Petersen, Kenneth L., et al.. (2020). Nest-Site Selection and Nesting Success in a Restored Population of Ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota (USA) Area. Journal of Raptor Research. 54(3). 4 indexed citations

2.

Ferguson, Gus, et al.. (2005). Wearable augmented virtual reality for enhancing information delivery in high precision defence assembly: an engineering case study. Virtual Reality. 8(3). 177–184. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact