Steven E. Kraft

1.0k total citations
43 papers, 739 citations indexed

About

Steven E. Kraft is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven E. Kraft has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 739 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 17 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 12 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Steven E. Kraft's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (17 papers), Forest Management and Policy (9 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers). Steven E. Kraft is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (17 papers), Forest Management and Policy (9 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers). Steven E. Kraft collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Egypt. Steven E. Kraft's co-authors include Christopher L. Lant, Timothy Loftus, J. B. Ruhl, Richard Grabowski, Shawna Grosskopf, Rolf Färe, David A. Bennett, Hassan Aly, John W. Nicklow and Margaret Gibelman and has published in prestigious journals such as BioScience, Ecological Economics and Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

In The Last Decade

Steven E. Kraft

41 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steven E. Kraft United States 15 290 276 179 161 105 43 739
William G. Boggess United States 16 192 0.7× 429 1.6× 83 0.5× 187 1.2× 82 0.8× 38 894
Kathrin Happe Germany 10 270 0.9× 163 0.6× 52 0.3× 318 2.0× 70 0.7× 20 694
Javier Calatrava-Requena Spain 10 236 0.8× 337 1.2× 35 0.2× 96 0.6× 114 1.1× 14 681
Christian Troost Germany 13 195 0.7× 134 0.5× 54 0.3× 215 1.3× 45 0.4× 27 671
Irina Verweij-Novikova Netherlands 12 328 1.1× 116 0.4× 99 0.6× 316 2.0× 134 1.3× 20 1.0k
Renan Goetz Spain 17 195 0.7× 337 1.2× 40 0.2× 417 2.6× 69 0.7× 49 976
Gonzalo Gamboa Spain 16 289 1.0× 111 0.4× 73 0.4× 93 0.6× 197 1.9× 27 779
Darrell J. Bosch United States 19 166 0.6× 286 1.0× 32 0.2× 204 1.3× 65 0.6× 81 1.0k
Richard Mulwa Kenya 14 116 0.4× 108 0.4× 125 0.7× 163 1.0× 58 0.6× 45 590
Guillermo Flichman France 15 198 0.7× 120 0.4× 55 0.3× 412 2.6× 84 0.8× 33 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Steven E. Kraft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven E. Kraft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven E. Kraft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven E. Kraft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven E. Kraft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven E. Kraft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven E. Kraft. The network helps show where Steven E. Kraft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven E. Kraft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven E. Kraft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven E. Kraft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven E. Kraft. Steven E. Kraft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lant, Christopher L., et al.. (2016). Environmental Systems Simulations for Carbon, Energy, Nitrogen, Water, and Watersheds: Design Principles and Pilot Testing. Journal of Geoscience Education. 64(2). 115–124. 5 indexed citations
2.
Lant, Christopher L., J. B. Ruhl, & Steven E. Kraft. (2009). The Tragedy of Ecosystem Services. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
3.
Duram, Leslie A., Timothy Loftus, Jane Adams, Christopher L. Lant, & Steven E. Kraft. (2008). Assessing the US watershed management movement: national trends and an Illinois case study. Water International. 33(2). 231–242. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kraft, Steven E., et al.. (2008). Ecosystem Services: A 21st Century Policy Challenge. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 23(2). 26–27. 4 indexed citations
5.
Lant, Christopher L., J. B. Ruhl, & Steven E. Kraft. (2008). The Tragedy of Ecosystem Services. BioScience. 58(10). 969–974. 94 indexed citations
6.
Kraft, Steven E., et al.. (2008). An Agent-Based Model of Multifunctional Agricultural Landscape Using Genetic Algorithms. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 12 indexed citations
7.
Moon, Wanki, et al.. (2005). Public Preferences for Multifunctionality of Agriculture: National Survey of Registered Voters. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
8.
Adams, Jane, et al.. (2005). Watershed Planning: Pseudo-democracy and its Alternatives – The Case of the Cache River Watershed, Illinois. Agriculture and Human Values. 22(3). 327–338. 12 indexed citations
9.
Lant, Christopher L., et al.. (2005). Using GIS-based ecological–economic modeling to evaluate policies affecting agricultural watersheds. Ecological Economics. 55(4). 467–484. 72 indexed citations
10.
Lant, Christopher L., Timothy Loftus, Steven E. Kraft, & David Bennett. (2001). Land-Use Dynamics in a Southern Illinois (USA) Watershed. Environmental Management. 28(3). 325–340. 17 indexed citations
11.
Kraft, Steven E., Christopher L. Lant, Jane Adams, et al.. (2000). Understanding the social context for ecological restoration in multiple-ownership watersheds. 1449. 1 indexed citations
12.
Bennett, David, et al.. (1998). Ecological-Economic Modeling On A Watershed Basis: A Case Study Of The Cache River Of Southern Illinois. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 6 indexed citations
13.
Gibelman, Margaret & Steven E. Kraft. (1996). Advocacy as a Core Agency Program:. Administration in Social Work. 20(4). 43–59. 22 indexed citations
14.
Lant, Christopher L., et al.. (1995). Enrollment of filter strips and recharge areas in the CRP and USDA easement programs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 50(2). 193–200. 23 indexed citations
15.
Lant, Christopher L., et al.. (1994). The Plans of CRP-Contract Holders for the Post-Contract Use of their CRP Land. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 32–44. 1 indexed citations
16.
Grabowski, Richard, Steven E. Kraft, Carl A. Pasurka, & Hassan Aly. (1990). A ray-homothetic production frontier and efficiency: grain farms in Southern Illinois. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 17(4). 435–448. 13 indexed citations
17.
Kraft, Steven E., et al.. (1989). The use of conservation practices by part-owner operators. Land Use Policy. 6(1). 31–41. 1 indexed citations
18.
Grabowski, Richard, Steven E. Kraft, Seyed Mehdian, & Carl A. Pasurka. (1988). Technological Change in Illinois Agriculture, 1982‐1984. Agricultural Economics. 2(4). 303–318. 1 indexed citations
19.
Kraft, Steven E., et al.. (1988). Why eligible landowners did not participate in the first four sign-ups of the Conservation Reserve Program. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 43(3). 251–256. 32 indexed citations
20.
Kraft, Steven E., et al.. (1986). ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR SOIL CONSERVATION PRACTICES. Review of Policy Research. 6(2). 245–259. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026