Steven C. Wasserman

654 total citations
11 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Steven C. Wasserman is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven C. Wasserman has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 3 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Steven C. Wasserman's work include Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Steven C. Wasserman is often cited by papers focused on Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers) and Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers). Steven C. Wasserman collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Steven C. Wasserman's co-authors include Scott R. Manalis, Selim Olçum, Nathan Cermak, Francisco Feijó Delgado, Yuki Kikuchi, Mark M. Stevens, Kristofor R. Payer, Scott M. Knudsen, F. Baleras and Arzu Sandikci and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Steven C. Wasserman

10 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Steven C. Wasserman

BE

AMPO

EEE

MB

MC

F. Baleras France

Kristofor R. Payer United States

Tianli Wu China

Chengxun Liu Belgium

Saju Nettikadan United States

Aline Cerf France

Senkei Umehara Japan

Bjorn Hammarström Sweden

Anita H. Forster United States

A. S. M. Kamruzzahan Austria

F. Baleras France

Steven C. Wasserman

153 ×0.7

BE

82 ×0.4

AMPO

93 ×0.6

EEE

60 ×0.7

MB

19 ×0.6

MC

Citations per year, relative to Steven C. Wasserman Steven C. Wasserman (= 1×) peers F. Baleras

Countries citing papers authored by Steven C. Wasserman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven C. Wasserman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven C. Wasserman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven C. Wasserman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven C. Wasserman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven C. Wasserman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven C. Wasserman. The network helps show where Steven C. Wasserman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven C. Wasserman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven C. Wasserman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven C. Wasserman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven C. Wasserman. Steven C. Wasserman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Wu, Jin, David Dellal, & Steven C. Wasserman. (2021). Prokaryote playhouse: A low-cost, laser-cut acrylic incubator for optogenetic bacterial culture. HardwareX. 9. e00184–e00184.

2.

Werley, Christopher A., et al.. (2017). An ultra-widefield microscope for high-speed, all-optical electrophysiology. 111. BrM4B.3–BrM4B.3. 2 indexed citations

3.

Cermak, Nathan, Selim Olçum, Francisco Feijó Delgado, et al.. (2016). High-throughput measurement of single-cell growth rates using serial microfluidic mass sensor arrays. Nature Biotechnology. 34(10). 1052–1059. 170 indexed citations

4.

Olçum, Selim, Nathan Cermak, Steven C. Wasserman, & Scott R. Manalis. (2015). High-speed multiple-mode mass-sensing resolves dynamic nanoscale mass distributions. Nature. 2 indexed citations

5.

Olçum, Selim, Nathan Cermak, Steven C. Wasserman, & Scott R. Manalis. (2015). High-speed multiple-mode mass-sensing resolves dynamic nanoscale mass distributions. Nature Communications. 6(1). 97 indexed citations

6.

Roche, Ellen T., Assunta Fabozzo, Yuhan Lee, et al.. (2015). A light-reflecting balloon catheter for atraumatic tissue defect repair. Science Translational Medicine. 7(306). 306ra149–306ra149. 34 indexed citations

7.

Olçum, Selim, Nathan Cermak, Steven C. Wasserman, et al.. (2014). Suspended nanochannel resonators at attogram precision. 116–119. 6 indexed citations

8.

Olçum, Selim, Nathan Cermak, Steven C. Wasserman, et al.. (2014). Weighing nanoparticles in solution at the attogram scale. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(4). 1310–1315. 102 indexed citations

9.

Delgado, Francisco Feijó, et al.. (2011). Mass sensors with mechanical traps for weighing single cells in different fluids. Lab on a Chip. 11(24). 4174–4174. 25 indexed citations

10.

Chang, Tsung-Yao, et al.. (2010). High-throughput in vivo vertebrate screening. Nature Methods. 7(8). 634–636. 6 indexed citations

11.

Wasserman, Steven C., et al.. (1979). Informed consent; Past, present, and future?. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 79(12). 1918–20. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact