Steven Badger

611 total citations
8 papers, 486 citations indexed

About

Steven Badger is a scholar working on Philosophy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven Badger has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 486 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Philosophy, 7 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Steven Badger's work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). Steven Badger is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers). Steven Badger collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Ireland. Steven Badger's co-authors include Philip McGuire, Paolo Fusar‐Poli, Lucia Valmaggia, Majella Byrne, Ceri Jones, Matteo Rocchetti, Benjamin Straube, Irina Falkenberg, Marianna Frascarelli and Louise Johns and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychiatry Research.

In The Last Decade

Steven Badger

8 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steven Badger United Kingdom 7 432 234 158 109 93 8 486
Derek Scholten Canada 10 475 1.1× 227 1.0× 199 1.3× 107 1.0× 59 0.6× 13 532
Martina Brandizzi Italy 11 338 0.8× 142 0.6× 204 1.3× 102 0.9× 92 1.0× 17 432
M. Weiser Israel 5 361 0.8× 111 0.5× 189 1.2× 64 0.6× 123 1.3× 14 509
L. Henry Australia 5 378 0.9× 155 0.7× 202 1.3× 83 0.8× 42 0.5× 7 441
Augusto Castagnini Italy 16 433 1.0× 184 0.8× 177 1.1× 69 0.6× 38 0.4× 27 517
Cristina Medina-Pradas Spain 8 349 0.8× 111 0.5× 354 2.2× 59 0.5× 81 0.9× 9 531
Rachael Spooner Australia 6 262 0.6× 84 0.4× 146 0.9× 54 0.5× 157 1.7× 7 405
Tamara Sale United States 7 283 0.7× 110 0.5× 77 0.5× 48 0.4× 84 0.9× 15 326
Beshaun J. Davis United States 11 250 0.6× 81 0.3× 136 0.9× 105 1.0× 86 0.9× 25 391
Ana Barajas Spain 13 300 0.7× 112 0.5× 134 0.8× 58 0.5× 99 1.1× 39 395

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Badger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Badger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Badger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Badger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Badger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Badger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Badger. The network helps show where Steven Badger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Badger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Badger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Badger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Badger. Steven Badger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Jarrett, Manuela, Andrew Forrester, Philip McGuire, et al.. (2016). Prison and Community Populations at Ultra-High Risk of Psychosis: Differences and Challenges for Service Provision. Psychiatric Services. 67(9). 990–995. 3 indexed citations
2.
Fusar‐Poli, Paolo, Marco Cappucciati, Grazia Rutigliano, et al.. (2016). Towards a Standard Psychometric Diagnostic Interview for Subjects at Ultra High Risk of Psychosis: CAARMS versus SIPS. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2016. 1–11. 94 indexed citations
3.
Brandizzi, Martina, Lucia Valmaggia, Majella Byrne, et al.. (2015). Predictors of functional outcome in individuals at high clinical risk for psychosis at six years follow-up. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 65. 115–123. 42 indexed citations
4.
Valmaggia, Lucia, Majella Byrne, Fern Day, et al.. (2015). Duration of untreated psychosis and need for admission in patients who engage with mental health services in the prodromal phase. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 207(2). 130–134. 58 indexed citations
5.
Falkenberg, Irina, Lucia Valmaggia, Marianna Frascarelli, et al.. (2015). Why are help-seeking subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis help-seeking?. Psychiatry Research. 228(3). 808–815. 104 indexed citations
6.
Patel, Rashmi, Covadonga M. Díaz‐Caneja, Lucia Valmaggia, et al.. (2014). Clinical outcomes of people with first episode psychosis presenting to the OASIS prodromal clinic in South London. Research Portal (King's College London). 8. 88–88. 12 indexed citations
7.
Badger, Steven, et al.. (2014). The impact of delivering GP training on the clinical high risk and first‐episode psychosis on referrals and pathways to care. Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 9(6). 459–466. 10 indexed citations
8.
Fusar‐Poli, Paolo, Majella Byrne, Steven Badger, Lucia Valmaggia, & Philip McGuire. (2012). Outreach and support in South London (OASIS), 2001–2011: Ten years of early diagnosis and treatment for young individuals at high clinical risk for psychosis. European Psychiatry. 28(5). 315–326. 163 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026