Steve Culley

1.4k total citations
46 papers, 992 citations indexed

About

Steve Culley is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Steve Culley has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 992 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 13 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 10 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Steve Culley's work include Design Education and Practice (20 papers), Product Development and Customization (12 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers). Steve Culley is often cited by papers focused on Design Education and Practice (20 papers), Product Development and Customization (12 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (8 papers). Steve Culley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Denmark. Steve Culley's co-authors include Chris McMahon, Mansur Darlington, Peter J. Wild, Shaofeng Liu, Philip Cash, Ben Hicks, Elies Dekoninck, Chris Snider, Chris McMahon and R I McIntosh and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, International Journal of Information Management and International Journal of Operations & Production Management.

In The Last Decade

Steve Culley

45 papers receiving 910 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steve Culley United Kingdom 15 312 200 192 182 143 46 992
Dan Braha United States 22 509 1.6× 442 2.2× 582 3.0× 176 1.0× 116 0.8× 47 1.5k
Christopher McComb United States 19 652 2.1× 299 1.5× 314 1.6× 127 0.7× 60 0.4× 164 1.4k
Denis Cavallucci France 16 470 1.5× 331 1.7× 422 2.2× 108 0.6× 38 0.3× 86 935
Johan Malmqvist Sweden 17 620 2.0× 463 2.3× 518 2.7× 74 0.4× 204 1.4× 128 2.0k
Rob Bracewell United Kingdom 15 562 1.8× 382 1.9× 423 2.2× 128 0.7× 110 0.8× 70 936
Davy Monticolo France 12 88 0.3× 169 0.8× 99 0.5× 109 0.6× 65 0.5× 50 551
Renate Fruchter United States 18 251 0.8× 97 0.5× 145 0.8× 145 0.8× 118 0.8× 108 1.3k
Mansur Darlington United Kingdom 9 117 0.4× 94 0.5× 108 0.6× 149 0.8× 115 0.8× 36 624
Runhua Tan China 16 379 1.2× 280 1.4× 382 2.0× 54 0.3× 38 0.3× 158 962
Yee Mey Goh United Kingdom 16 107 0.3× 192 1.0× 203 1.1× 45 0.2× 43 0.3× 68 841

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Culley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Culley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Culley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Culley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Culley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Culley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Culley. The network helps show where Steve Culley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steve Culley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steve Culley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steve Culley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steve Culley. Steve Culley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hicks, Ben, Steve Culley, James Gopsill, & Chris Snider. (2019). Managing complex engineering projects: What can we learn from the evolving digital footprint?. International Journal of Information Management. 51. 102016–102016. 11 indexed citations
2.
Snider, Chris, Elies Dekoninck, & Steve Culley. (2016). Beyond the concept: characterisations of later-stage creative behaviour in design. Research in Engineering Design. 27(3). 265–289. 13 indexed citations
3.
Newnes, Linda, et al.. (2015). DS 80-3 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 3. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cash, Philip, Ben Hicks, & Steve Culley. (2015). Activity Theory as a means for multi-scale analysis of the engineering design process: A protocol study of design in practice. Design Studies. 38. 1–32. 42 indexed citations
5.
Cash, Philip, Ben Hicks, Steve Culley, & Tim Adlam. (2015). A foundational observation method for studying design situations. Journal of Engineering Design. 26(7-9). 187–219. 16 indexed citations
6.
Gopsill, James, et al.. (2014). Towards identifying patterns in engineering documents to aid project planning. The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath). 1873–1882. 4 indexed citations
7.
Culley, Steve, et al.. (2013). Establishing key elements for handling in-service information and knowledge. 11–20. 2 indexed citations
8.
Snider, Chris, Steve Culley, & Elies Dekoninck. (2013). Analysing creative behaviour in the later stage design process. Design Studies. 34(5). 543–574. 29 indexed citations
9.
Rudolph, Stephan, et al.. (2012). Design Computing and Cognition (DCC'10). Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing. 26(2). 105–106. 8 indexed citations
10.
Xie, Yifan, et al.. (2011). Applying context to organize unstructured information in aerospace industry. 424–435. 4 indexed citations
11.
Xie, Yifan, et al.. (2010). Handling of in-service support: Comparison of two case studies from complex industries. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU). 1209–1218. 2 indexed citations
12.
Culley, Steve, et al.. (2010). Understanding the rapid evaluation of innovative ideas in the early stages of design. International Journal of Product Development. 12(1). 67–67. 20 indexed citations
13.
Štorga, Mario, et al.. (2009). Toward a Process and Method for Tracing the Development of Information Objects Used in Engineering Design. 19–19. 1 indexed citations
14.
Wild, Peter J., Chris McMahon, Mansur Darlington, Shaofeng Liu, & Steve Culley. (2009). A diary study of information needs and document usage in the engineering domain. Design Studies. 31(1). 46–73. 49 indexed citations
15.
Howard, Thomas J., Steve Culley, & Elies Dekoninck. (2008). Creative Stimulation in Conceptual Design: An Analysis of Industrial Case Studies. 161–170. 10 indexed citations
16.
McIntosh, R I, et al.. (2007). Changeover Improvement: Reinterpreting Shingo's “SMED” Methodology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 54(1). 98–111. 38 indexed citations
17.
McMahon, Chris, et al.. (2004). Characterising the requirements of engineering information systems. International Journal of Information Management. 24(5). 401–422. 40 indexed citations
18.
Culley, Steve. (2001). 13th International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED 01 : design research - theories, methodologies, and product modelling, 21-23 August 2001, Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre, Glasgow, UK. 1 indexed citations
19.
Culley, Steve. (2001). 13th International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED 01 : design applications in industry and education, 21-23 August 2001, Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre, Glasgow, UK. 5 indexed citations
20.
McMahon, Chris, et al.. (1999). A Method for the Study of Information Use Profiles for Design Engineers. 109–119. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026