Stephen W.P. Kemp

3.3k citations
87 papers · 2.3k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen W.P. Kemp

78 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Stephen W.P. Kemp
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 203
  • Rehabilitation 173
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 136
  • Transplantation 60
Replace Esther Udina with:
Esther Udina Spain
K. Ming Chan Canada
Dolores Ceballos Spain
Christian Krarup Denmark
Martijn J. A. Malessy Netherlands
Ronald Deumens Netherlands
Enrique Verdú Spain
Pierluigi Tos Italy
Damien P. Kuffler Puerto Rico
Marcel F. Meek Netherlands
Stephen W.P. Kemp relative to Esther Udina Spain Esther Udina's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Esther Udina · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen W.P. Kemp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen W.P. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen W.P. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen W.P. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen W.P. Kemp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen W.P. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen W.P. Kemp. The network helps show where Stephen W.P. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen W.P. Kemp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen W.P. Kemp Line = papers co-authored together Stephen W.P. Kemp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011209
2 2020162
3 2019118
4 2011113
5 2009107
6 201887
7 201286
8 200878
9 201978
10 201773
11 201771
12 200969
13 200961
14 201456
15 201650
16 201847
17 201444
18 201243
19 201640
20 200139

About Stephen W.P. Kemp

Stephen W.P. Kemp is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 87 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (37 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (25 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (25 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (17 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (5 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Developmental Neuroscience (203 citations), Rehabilitation (173 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (136 citations) and Transplantation (60 citations). Stephen W.P. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Cederna, Rajiv Midha, Sarah K. Walsh, Carrie A. Kubiak, Gregory H. Borschel, Matthew D. Wood, Tessa Gordon, Theodore A. Kung, Theodore A. Kung and Christine Weber. Their work appears in journals such as Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Muscle & Nerve, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Experimental Neurology and Neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact