Stephen van Leeuwen
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Adrian PinderMargaret ByrneByron B. LamontColin J. YatesD. Andrew BrownStephen D. HopperDavid CoatesKevin R. Thiele
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen van Leeuwen
49 papers receiving 726 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Ecology 349
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 318
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 203
- Ecological Modeling 185
- Plant Science 144
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen van Leeuwen
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen van Leeuwen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen van Leeuwen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen van Leeuwen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen van Leeuwen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen van Leeuwen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen van Leeuwen. The network helps show where Stephen van Leeuwen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen van Leeuwen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen van Leeuwen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen van Leeuwen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen van Leeuwen. Stephen van Leeuwen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 103 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | A new mitrasacme (Loganiaceae) from the western Australian desert | 2 |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Tecticornia bibenda (Chenopodiaceae: Salicornioideae), a new C4 samphire from the Little Sandy Desert, Western Australia | 2 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Stephen van Leeuwen
Stephen van Leeuwen is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (13 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (185 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (318 citations) and Ecology (349 citations). Stephen van Leeuwen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Adrian Pinder, Margaret Byrne, Byron B. Lamont, Colin J. Yates, D. Andrew Brown, Stephen D. Hopper, David Coates, Kevin R. Thiele, Julian Tonti‐Filippini and Xiao Zhong. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and Conservation Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.