Stephen R. Hinkle

1.3k total citations
25 papers, 971 citations indexed

About

Stephen R. Hinkle is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Environmental Engineering and Water Science and Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen R. Hinkle has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 971 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology, 16 papers in Environmental Engineering and 14 papers in Water Science and Technology. Recurrent topics in Stephen R. Hinkle's work include Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (17 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (16 papers) and Water Quality and Resources Studies (10 papers). Stephen R. Hinkle is often cited by papers focused on Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (17 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (16 papers) and Water Quality and Resources Studies (10 papers). Stephen R. Hinkle collaborates with scholars based in United States. Stephen R. Hinkle's co-authors include J. K. Böhlke, Charles P. Gerba, Roger C. Bales, John H. Duff, David Morgan, L. Niel Plummer, Stephanie Dunkle Shapiro, Peter B. McMahon, Dennis A. Wentz and Kenneth E. Bencala and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, The Science of The Total Environment and Journal of Hydrology.

In The Last Decade

Stephen R. Hinkle

24 papers receiving 888 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen R. Hinkle United States 16 503 467 408 307 119 25 971
David L. Lorenz United States 15 268 0.5× 514 1.1× 227 0.6× 407 1.3× 181 1.5× 47 997
Dugin Kaown South Korea 20 501 1.0× 334 0.7× 620 1.5× 212 0.7× 159 1.3× 65 1.1k
Matthew Ascott United Kingdom 14 276 0.5× 397 0.9× 335 0.8× 276 0.9× 69 0.6× 34 868
Edwin E. Cey Canada 16 483 1.0× 447 1.0× 295 0.7× 264 0.9× 136 1.1× 31 1.1k
Luc Rock Canada 16 299 0.6× 201 0.4× 394 1.0× 274 0.9× 179 1.5× 32 793
Raymond Flynn United Kingdom 15 293 0.6× 299 0.6× 157 0.4× 180 0.6× 125 1.1× 54 766
Ricardo González‐Pinzón United States 20 444 0.9× 652 1.4× 232 0.6× 588 1.9× 267 2.2× 44 1.3k
Craig J. Brown United States 16 293 0.6× 287 0.6× 325 0.8× 189 0.6× 38 0.3× 44 764
Jana Levison Canada 18 322 0.6× 322 0.7× 228 0.6× 123 0.4× 59 0.5× 47 701
Atul H. Haria United Kingdom 13 240 0.5× 240 0.5× 167 0.4× 157 0.5× 71 0.6× 21 581

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen R. Hinkle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen R. Hinkle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen R. Hinkle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen R. Hinkle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen R. Hinkle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen R. Hinkle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen R. Hinkle. The network helps show where Stephen R. Hinkle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen R. Hinkle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen R. Hinkle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen R. Hinkle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen R. Hinkle. Stephen R. Hinkle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mehta, Smita, et al.. (2017). Hydrogeologic framework and selected components of the groundwater budget for the upper Umatilla River Basin, Oregon. Scientific investigations report. 3 indexed citations
2.
Kirk, Matthew F., et al.. (2015). Substantial contribution of biomethylation to aquifer arsenic cycling. Nature Geoscience. 8(4). 290–293. 40 indexed citations
3.
Ayotte, Joseph D., et al.. (2014). Factors affecting temporal variability of arsenic in groundwater used for drinking water supply in the United States. The Science of The Total Environment. 505. 1370–1379. 89 indexed citations
4.
Starn, J. Jeffrey, et al.. (2014). Simulating Water‐Quality Trends in Public‐Supply Wells in Transient Flow Systems. Ground Water. 52(S1). 53–62. 22 indexed citations
5.
Gendaszek, Andrew S., et al.. (2014). Hydrogeologic framework and groundwater/surface-water interactions of the upper Yakima River Basin, Kittitas County, central Washington. Scientific investigations report. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hinkle, Stephen R. & Anthony J. Tesoriero. (2013). Nitrogen speciation and trends, and prediction of denitrification extent, in shallow US groundwater. Journal of Hydrology. 509. 343–353. 37 indexed citations
7.
Hinkle, Stephen R., Kenneth E. Bencala, Dennis A. Wentz, & David P. Krabbenhoft. (2013). Mercury and Methylmercury Dynamics in the Hyporheic Zone of an Oregon Stream. Water Air & Soil Pollution. 225(1). 11 indexed citations
8.
Hinkle, Stephen R., et al.. (2011). Estimates of tracer-based piston-flow ages of groundwater from selected sites: National Water-Quality Assessment Program, 1992–2005. Scientific investigations report. 16 indexed citations
9.
10.
McMahon, Peter B., L. Niel Plummer, J. K. Böhlke, Stephanie Dunkle Shapiro, & Stephen R. Hinkle. (2011). A comparison of recharge rates in aquifers of the United States based on groundwater-age data. Hydrogeology Journal. 19(4). 779–800. 121 indexed citations
11.
Hinkle, Stephen R., Leon J. Kauffman, Craig J. Brown, et al.. (2009). Combining particle-tracking and geochemical data to assess public supply well vulnerability to arsenic and uranium. Journal of Hydrology. 376(1-2). 132–142. 15 indexed citations
12.
Hinkle, Stephen R.. (2009). Tritium/Helium-3 Apparent Ages of Shallow Ground Water, Portland Basin, Oregon, 1997-98. Scientific investigations report. 3 indexed citations
13.
Hinkle, Stephen R., et al.. (2008). Mass balance and isotope effects during nitrogen transport through septic tank systems with packed-bed (sand) filters. The Science of The Total Environment. 407(1). 324–332. 40 indexed citations
14.
Hinkle, Stephen R., et al.. (2007). Ground water redox zonation near La Pine, Oregon: Relation to river position within the aquifer–riparian zone continuum. Scientific investigations report. 2 indexed citations
15.
Hinkle, Stephen R., et al.. (2006). Aquifer-scale controls on the distribution of nitrate and ammonium in ground water near La Pine, Oregon, USA. Journal of Hydrology. 333(2-4). 486–503. 73 indexed citations
16.
17.
Morgan, David, et al.. (2002). Simulation of Flow and Transport of Septic-Derived Nitrate at Multiple Scales Within a Heterogeneous Alluvial Aquifer System. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2002. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hinkle, Stephen R., John H. Duff, Frank J. Triska, et al.. (2001). Linking hyporheic flow and nitrogen cycling near the Willamette River — a large river in Oregon, USA. Journal of Hydrology. 244(3-4). 157–180. 112 indexed citations
19.
Wentz, Dennis A., Kurt D. Carpenter, Stephen R. Hinkle, et al.. (1998). Water quality in the Willamette Basin, Oregon, 1991-95. U.S. Geological Survey circular. 42 indexed citations
20.
Wentz, Dennis A., et al.. (1996). Willamette Basin, Oregon; nitrogen in streams and ground water, 1980-90. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026