Stephen LeDrew

522 total citations
7 papers, 128 citations indexed

About

Stephen LeDrew is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen LeDrew has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 128 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Health and 1 paper in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Stephen LeDrew's work include Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper). Stephen LeDrew is often cited by papers focused on Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (1 paper). Stephen LeDrew collaborates with scholars based in Canada and Sweden. Stephen LeDrew's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Sociology of Religion, History of the Human Sciences and Social Compass.

In The Last Decade

Stephen LeDrew

6 papers receiving 120 citations

Peers

Stephen LeDrew

SPS

HEALT

PHILO

SP

EDUCA

Jeffrey S. Siker United States

Gergely Rosta Hungary

Catherine Wessinger United States

Christopher Craig Brittain United Kingdom

Charles E. Farhadian United States

Harriet A. Harris United Kingdom

Marc Gopin United States

D. A. Carson United States

Mary McClintock Fulkerson United States

Pablo Semán Argentina

Jeffrey S. Siker United States

Stephen LeDrew

74 ×0.7

SPS

12 ×0.2

HEALT

22 ×0.8

PHILO

20 ×1.0

SP

5 ×0.4

EDUCA

Citations per year, relative to Stephen LeDrew Stephen LeDrew (= 1×) peers Jeffrey S. Siker

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen LeDrew

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen LeDrew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen LeDrew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen LeDrew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen LeDrew

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen LeDrew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen LeDrew. The network helps show where Stephen LeDrew may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

LeDrew, Stephen. (2020). Atheism as a Political Project. Politics and Religion. 13(2). 415–423. 1 indexed citations

2.

LeDrew, Stephen, et al.. (2019). Unorganized atheism and the secular movement: reddit as a site for studying ‘lived atheism’. Social Compass. 66(1). 112–129. 19 indexed citations

3.

LeDrew, Stephen. (2015). The Evolution of Atheism. Oxford University Press eBooks. 18 indexed citations

4.

LeDrew, Stephen. (2013). Reply: Toward a Critical Sociology of Atheism: Identity, Politics, Ideology. Sociology of Religion. 74(4). 464–470. 5 indexed citations

5.

LeDrew, Stephen. (2013). Discovering Atheism: Heterogeneity in Trajectories to Atheist Identity and Activism. Sociology of Religion. 74(4). 431–453. 65 indexed citations

6.

LeDrew, Stephen. (2012). The evolution of atheism. History of the Human Sciences. 25(3). 70–87. 20 indexed citations

7.

LeDrew, Stephen. (2006). Jokes and Their Relation to the Uncanny: The Comic, the Horrific, and Pleasure in Audition and Romero's Dead Films.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact