Stephen J. Evans

610 citations
25 papers · 423 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen J. Evans

24 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers

Stephen J. Evans
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Pollution 80
  • Cancer Research 66
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 65
  • Materials Chemistry 169
  • Small Animals 25
Replace Monita Sharma with:
Monita Sharma United States
Thomas Loret France
Yukiko Yoshiura Japan
Yoshimitsu Sakamoto Japan
Xuejun J. Yin United States
Katherine E. Chapman United Kingdom
Ryan D. Quesenberry United States
Guanqun Cui China
Masami Hirohashi Japan
Katelyn J. Siegrist United States
Stephen J. Evans relative to Monita Sharma United States Monita Sharma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Monita Sharma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Evans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Evans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Evans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Evans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Evans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Evans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Evans. The network helps show where Stephen J. Evans may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen J. Evans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen J. Evans Line = papers co-authored together Stephen J. Evans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201666
2 201949
3 197645
4 202037
5 202035
6 201632
7 202025
8 202125
9 202019
10 202215
11 202113
12 202412
13 202012
14 20217
15 20227
16 20206
17 20225
18 20243
19 20193
20
MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD FLOW BY NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE TECHNIQUES.
19742

About Stephen J. Evans

Stephen J. Evans is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Pollution, Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (10 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (5 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (4 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (2 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers), Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure (2 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (80 citations), Cancer Research (66 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (65 citations), Materials Chemistry (169 citations) and Small Animals (25 citations). Stephen J. Evans has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shareen H. Doak, Martin J. D. Clift, Gareth Jenkins, Thomas S. Wilkinson, John W. Wills, Nicole Hondow, Neenu Singh, Samantha V. Llewellyn, H Berry and Gillian E. Conway. Their work appears in journals such as Mutagenesis, Nanotoxicology, Particle and Fibre Toxicology, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Toxicology in Vitro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact