Stephen J. Douglas

678 total citations
10 papers, 378 citations indexed

About

Stephen J. Douglas is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen J. Douglas has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 378 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Organic Chemistry, 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Stephen J. Douglas's work include Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers). Stephen J. Douglas is often cited by papers focused on Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers). Stephen J. Douglas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Switzerland. Stephen J. Douglas's co-authors include Lisbeth Illum, S.S. Davis, Stanley S. Davis, S.R. Holding, S.S. Davis, Stanley S. Davis, Patrick D. Wolf and Stephen W. Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Journal of Controlled Release and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

In The Last Decade

Stephen J. Douglas

10 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Stephen J. Douglas

BIOMA

PS

OC

BE

MB

Andreza Maria Ribeiro Portugal

E. Mak Denmark

Yeshwant D. Sanzgiri United States

Maria Helena Andrade Santana Brazil

Thimma R. Thatiparti United States

Dimitris Fatouros Greece

Xu Wen Ng Singapore

Donald R. Cowsar United States

L. Roblot-Treupel France

Ellina A. Mun Kazakhstan

Andreza Maria Ribeiro Portugal

Stephen J. Douglas

134 ×0.9

BIOMA

209 ×1.7

PS

88 ×1.1

OC

105 ×1.6

BE

70 ×1.3

MB

Citations per year, relative to Stephen J. Douglas Stephen J. Douglas (= 1×) peers Andreza Maria Ribeiro

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Douglas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Douglas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Douglas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Douglas. The network helps show where Stephen J. Douglas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. Douglas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. Douglas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. Douglas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. Douglas. Stephen J. Douglas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Douglas, Stephen J., S.S. Davis, & Lisbeth Illum. (2021). Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery. PubMed. 3(3). 233–61. 17 indexed citations

2.

Smith, Stephen W., et al.. (2014). Double Ring Array Catheter for In Vivo Real-Time 3D Ultrasound. Ultrasonic Imaging. 36(3). 167–176. 5 indexed citations

3.

Douglas, Stephen J., et al.. (2002). Cross-talk paths in array transducers. 2. 1279–1282. 28 indexed citations

4.

Douglas, Stephen J. & Stanley S. Davis. (1986). Radiolabelling of poly(butyl 2‐cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles with a technetium‐99m‐dextran complex. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 23(5). 495–504. 4 indexed citations

5.

Douglas, Stephen J., Stanley S. Davis, & Lisbeth Illum. (1986). Biodistribution of poly(butyl 2-cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles in rabbits. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 34(1-2). 145–152. 60 indexed citations

6.

Douglas, Stephen J., S.S. Davis, & Lisbeth Illum. (1986). A Method for the Covalent Attachment of Monoclonal Antibodies to Nanoparticles. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 38(Supplement_12). 99P–99P. 1 indexed citations

7.

Douglas, Stephen J., Lisbeth Illum, & Stanley S. Davis. (1986). Poly(butyl 2-cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles with differing surface charges. Journal of Controlled Release. 3(1-4). 15–23. 19 indexed citations

8.

Douglas, Stephen J., Lisbeth Illum, & S.S. Davis. (1985). Particle size and size distribution of poly(butyl 2-cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. II. Influence of stabilizers. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 103(1). 154–163. 99 indexed citations

9.

Douglas, Stephen J., S.S. Davis, & S.R. Holding. (1985). Molecular weights of poly(butyl 2‐cyanoacrylate) produced during nanoparticle formation. British Polymer Journal. 17(4). 339–342. 20 indexed citations

10.

Douglas, Stephen J., et al.. (1984). Particle size and size distribution of poly(butyl-2-cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 101(1). 149–158. 125 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact