Stephen Hughes

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
38 papers, 815 citations indexed

About

Stephen Hughes is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Epidemiology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Hughes has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 815 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 11 papers in Epidemiology and 10 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Stephen Hughes's work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (13 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (9 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers). Stephen Hughes is often cited by papers focused on Antibiotic Use and Resistance (13 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (9 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers). Stephen Hughes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ukraine. Stephen Hughes's co-authors include Luke Moore, Nabeela Mughal, Oliver Troise, Hugo Donaldson, Damian Tolan, Charles Tomson, Andrew Connor, Mark Gilchrist, Ryan Hamilton and Jacqueline Sneddon and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Gut and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Hughes

34 papers receiving 787 citations

Hit Papers

Bacterial and fungal coin... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Hughes United Kingdom 12 360 340 260 135 103 38 815
Kalvin Yu United States 18 338 0.9× 253 0.7× 428 1.6× 104 0.8× 222 2.2× 72 965
Jeannie D. Chan United States 20 133 0.4× 303 0.9× 267 1.0× 153 1.1× 106 1.0× 53 1.1k
Francesco Burkert Austria 10 321 0.9× 322 0.9× 212 0.8× 112 0.8× 105 1.0× 21 808
Bernard Camins United States 20 268 0.7× 628 1.8× 331 1.3× 128 0.9× 97 0.9× 59 1.2k
Fidelma A. Magee United Kingdom 11 243 0.7× 203 0.6× 256 1.0× 98 0.7× 68 0.7× 12 766
Elizabeth McLaughlin United States 14 386 1.1× 175 0.5× 409 1.6× 133 1.0× 52 0.5× 38 847
Mervyn Mer South Africa 18 122 0.3× 230 0.7× 329 1.3× 169 1.3× 93 0.9× 46 919
Arturo Galindo‐Fraga Mexico 15 109 0.3× 374 1.1× 302 1.2× 89 0.7× 131 1.3× 54 743
Kathryn Dzintars United States 11 382 1.1× 184 0.5× 320 1.2× 114 0.8× 152 1.5× 31 862
Majid M. Alshamrani Saudi Arabia 15 180 0.5× 251 0.7× 160 0.6× 70 0.5× 114 1.1× 46 604

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hughes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hughes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hughes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hughes. The network helps show where Stephen Hughes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Hughes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Hughes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Hughes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Hughes. Stephen Hughes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pitt, Rachel, Stephen Hughes, Hugo Donaldson, et al.. (2024). Investigating the cause of increased tetracycline-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in England, 2016–20. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 79(5). 1060–1068. 2 indexed citations
2.
Woolley, Stephen, Aula Abbara, Lucy Lamb, et al.. (2024). Conflict and catastrophe-related severe burn injuries: A challenging setting for antimicrobial decision-making. Journal of Infection. 89(3). 106224–106224. 1 indexed citations
3.
Clarke, Simon A., et al.. (2023). Bacterial peritonitis in paediatric appendicitis; microbial epidemiology and antimicrobial management. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials. 22(1). 45–45. 3 indexed citations
4.
Hughes, Stephen, et al.. (2022). Optimization of antimicrobial dosing in patients with acute kidney injury: a single-centre observational study. JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance. 4(4). dlac080–dlac080. 5 indexed citations
5.
6.
Hamilton, Ryan, Stephen Hughes, C Jamieson, et al.. (2022). Systematic review of high-dose amikacin regimens for the treatment of Gram-negative infections based on EUCAST dosing recommendations. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 30(4). 189–195. 5 indexed citations
7.
Denny, Sarah, Timothy M. Rawson, Giovanni Satta, et al.. (2021). Bacteraemia variation during the COVID-19 pandemic; a multi-centre UK secondary care ecological analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases. 21(1). 556–556. 21 indexed citations
8.
Moore, Luke, et al.. (2021). Listeria monocytogenes infections: presentation, diagnosis and treatment. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 82(10). 1–6. 18 indexed citations
9.
Hughes, Stephen, Nabeela Mughal, & Luke Moore. (2021). Procalcitonin to Guide Antibacterial Prescribing in Patients Hospitalised with COVID-19. Antibiotics. 10(9). 1119–1119. 13 indexed citations
10.
Hughes, Stephen, et al.. (2021). Burden of enteral supplement interactions with common antimicrobial agents: a single-centre observational analysis. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 29(5). 280–283. 2 indexed citations
11.
Patel, Aatish, Sarah Denny, Nabeela Mughal, et al.. (2020). Investigating the association between ethnicity and health outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 in a London secondary care population. PLoS ONE. 15(10). e0240960–e0240960. 14 indexed citations
12.
Hughes, Stephen, Oliver Troise, Hugo Donaldson, Nabeela Mughal, & Luke Moore. (2020). Bacterial and fungal coinfection among hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study in a UK secondary-care setting. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 26(10). 1395–1399. 452 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Moore, Luke, et al.. (2020). Evaluating the risk of hyperkalaemia and acute kidney injury with cotrimoxazole: a retrospective observational study. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 26(12). 1651–1657. 15 indexed citations
14.
Hughes, Stephen, et al.. (2020). Streptococcus agalactiae macrolide/lincosamide resistance; implications for puerperal antimicrobial therapy. Access Microbiology. 2(2). 1 indexed citations
16.
Hughes, Stephen & Luke Moore. (2019). Antimicrobial stewardship. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 80(3). C42–C45. 10 indexed citations
17.
Hughes, Stephen, et al.. (2019). Evaluating the impact of the ICNET® clinical decision support system for antimicrobial stewardship. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 8(1). 51–51. 18 indexed citations
18.
Hughes, Stephen, Kate LeMay, Bandana Saini, & Carol Armour. (2015). Pharmacy asthma services - will evidence alone sustain them?. 34(1). 67. 2 indexed citations
19.
Connor, Andrew, et al.. (2012). Consensus guidelines for the safe prescription and administration of oral bowel-cleansing agents. Gut. 61(11). 1525–1532. 75 indexed citations
20.
Hughes, Stephen. (1990). Nephrology and astrology – is there a link?. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 44(7). 279–279. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026