Stephen Hartley

3.3k total citations
78 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Stephen Hartley is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Hartley has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Ecology, 23 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 22 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Stephen Hartley's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (20 papers) and Plant and animal studies (20 papers). Stephen Hartley is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (20 papers) and Plant and animal studies (20 papers). Stephen Hartley collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Stephen Hartley's co-authors include William E. Kunin, Philip J. Lester, Jack J. Lennon, Angela T. Moles, Stefanos P. Sgardelis, Athanasios S. Kallimanis, John M. Halley, Bryan Shorrocks, Richard J. Harris and Kevin C. Burns and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Scientific Reports and The American Naturalist.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Hartley

73 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Hartley New Zealand 24 781 780 752 595 430 78 2.1k
Timothy C. Bonebrake Hong Kong 26 675 0.9× 1.0k 1.3× 827 1.1× 825 1.4× 468 1.1× 104 2.3k
Yasuhiro Kubota Japan 27 1.3k 1.7× 643 0.8× 711 0.9× 519 0.9× 594 1.4× 106 2.2k
Giovanni Strona Italy 28 575 0.7× 1.2k 1.5× 475 0.6× 348 0.6× 502 1.2× 106 2.2k
Jon M. Yearsley United Kingdom 28 649 0.8× 1.1k 1.4× 633 0.8× 277 0.5× 694 1.6× 67 2.5k
Heather M. Kharouba Canada 21 992 1.3× 970 1.2× 1.0k 1.4× 1.3k 2.1× 438 1.0× 43 2.4k
Sam Veloz United States 18 845 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 482 0.6× 1.1k 1.9× 611 1.4× 29 2.2k
Petr Keil Czechia 26 1.1k 1.5× 1.1k 1.4× 838 1.1× 1.1k 1.9× 415 1.0× 54 2.5k
Len N. Gillman New Zealand 20 626 0.8× 655 0.8× 531 0.7× 279 0.5× 299 0.7× 42 1.6k
Annette Ostling United States 24 1.4k 1.9× 1.1k 1.4× 1.0k 1.4× 797 1.3× 447 1.0× 46 2.6k
Julien Renaud France 28 1.4k 1.8× 1.1k 1.5× 919 1.2× 1.2k 2.0× 720 1.7× 64 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hartley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hartley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hartley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hartley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hartley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hartley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hartley. The network helps show where Stephen Hartley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Hartley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Hartley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Hartley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Hartley. Stephen Hartley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Tomscha, Stephanie A., Bethanna Jackson, Rubianca Benavidez, et al.. (2023). A multiscale perspective on how much wetland restoration is needed to achieve targets for ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services. 61. 101527–101527. 6 indexed citations
3.
Wilson, Deborah J., et al.. (2022). Invasive Urban Mammalian Predators: Distribution and Multi-Scale Habitat Selection. Biology. 11(10). 1527–1527. 7 indexed citations
4.
Tomscha, Stephanie A., Bethanna Jackson, Mairéad de Róiste, et al.. (2021). Multiple methods confirm wetland restoration improves ecosystem services. Ecosystems and People. 17(1). 25–40. 27 indexed citations
5.
Linklater, Wayne L., et al.. (2020). Responses of New Zealand forest birds to management of introduced mammals. Conservation Biology. 35(1). 35–49. 21 indexed citations
6.
Nelson, Nicola J., et al.. (2020). The effects of squid-baiting pitfall traps for sampling wētā (Orthoptera) and other ground-dwelling forest invertebrates. New Zealand Entomologist. 43(2). 77–85. 1 indexed citations
7.
Hartley, Stephen, et al.. (2020). Bioacoustic monitoring of lower North Island bird communities before and after aerial application of 1080. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 3 indexed citations
8.
Tomscha, Stephanie A., Julie R. Deslippe, Mairéad de Róiste, Stephen Hartley, & Bethanna Jackson. (2019). Uncovering the ecosystem service legacies of wetland loss using high‐resolution models. Ecosphere. 10(10). 11 indexed citations
9.
Santoro, Davide, Stephen Hartley, & Philip J. Lester. (2019). Behaviourally specialized foragers are less efficient and live shorter lives than generalists in wasp colonies. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 5366–5366. 17 indexed citations
10.
Carter, Anna, et al.. (2018). Modelled incubation conditions indicate wider potential distributions based on thermal requirements for an oviparous lizard. Journal of Biogeography. 45(8). 1872–1883. 4 indexed citations
11.
Carter, Anna, Michael Kearney, Stephen Hartley, Warren P. Porter, & Nicola J. Nelson. (2017). Geostatistical interpolation can reliably extend coverage of a very high‐resolution model of temperature‐dependent sex determination. Journal of Biogeography. 45(3). 652–663. 6 indexed citations
12.
Hartley, Stephen, et al.. (2016). Trends in lizard translocations in New Zealand between 1988 and 2013. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 43(2). 191–210. 11 indexed citations
13.
Carter, Anna, Michael Kearney, Nicola J. Mitchell, et al.. (2016). Modelling the soil microclimate: does the spatial or temporal resolution of input parameters matter?. Frontiers of Biogeography. 7(4). 15 indexed citations
14.
Hartley, Stephen, et al.. (2015). Tri‐trophic interactions and the minimal effect of larval microsite and plant attributes on parasitism of Sphenella fascigera (Diptera: Tephritidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 42(2). 85–93. 2 indexed citations
15.
Madawala, Sumedha, et al.. (2014). Comparative growth and photosynthetic responses of native and adventive iceplant taxa to salinity stress. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 52(3). 352–364. 4 indexed citations
16.
Hartley, Stephen, et al.. (2014). Weaker resource diffusion effect at coarser spatial scales observed for egg distribution of cabbage white butterflies. Oecologia. 177(2). 423–430. 6 indexed citations
17.
Hartley, Stephen, et al.. (2011). White butterfly (Pieris rapae) and the white rust Albugo candida on Cook's scurvy grass (Lepidium oleraceum).. New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 35(1). 69–75. 9 indexed citations
18.
Moles, Angela T., et al.. (2010). Is rapid evolution common in introduced plant species?. Journal of Ecology. 99(1). 214–224. 139 indexed citations
19.
20.
Mollan, Susan P., James S. Wolffsohn, Mohammad Laiquzzaman, et al.. (2008). Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 92(12). 1661–1665. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026