Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Snorkel
2017378 citationsAlexander Ratner, Stephen H. Bach et al.profile →
Interpretable Decision Sets
2016343 citationsStephen H. Bach et al.PubMedprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen H. Bach
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen H. Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen H. Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen H. Bach more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen H. Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen H. Bach. The network helps show where Stephen H. Bach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen H. Bach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen H. Bach.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen H. Bach based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen H. Bach. Stephen H. Bach is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Park, Andrew, et al.. (2021). Semi-Supervised Aggregation of Dependent Weak Supervision Sources With Performance Guarantees. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 3196–3204.2 indexed citations
10.
Bach, Stephen H., et al.. (2021). Adversarial Multi Class Learning under Weak Supervision with Performance Guarantees. 2021. 7534–7543.5 indexed citations
Ratner, Alexander, Stephen H. Bach, Henry R. Ehrenberg, et al.. (2017). Snorkel: A System for Lightweight Extraction.. Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research.2 indexed citations
13.
Ratner, Alexander, Stephen H. Bach, Henry R. Ehrenberg, & Chris Ré. (2017). Snorkel. 1683–1686.40 indexed citations
14.
Bach, Stephen H., Bryan He, Alexander Ratner, & Cristina Re. (2017). Learning the Structure of Generative Models without Labeled Data.. PubMed. 70. 273–82.34 indexed citations
15.
Bach, Stephen H., Bert Huang, & Lise Getoor. (2015). Unifying Local Consistency and MAX SAT Relaxations for Scalable Inference with Rounding Guarantees. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 46–55.3 indexed citations
16.
Bach, Stephen H., Bert Huang, Ben London, & Lise Getoor. (2013). Hinge-loss Markov random fields: convex inference for structured prediction. arXiv (Cornell University). 32–41.33 indexed citations
17.
Bach, Stephen H., Bert Huang, & Lise Getoor. (2013). Learning Latent Groups with Hinge-loss Markov Random Fields.4 indexed citations
18.
Bach, Stephen H., Matthias Broecheler, Lise Getoor, & Dianne P. O’Leary. (2012). Scaling MPE Inference for Constrained Continuous Markov Random Fields with Consensus Optimization. Neural Information Processing Systems. 25. 2654–2662.24 indexed citations
19.
Bach, Stephen H., et al.. (2010). A Bayesian Approach to Concept Drift. Neural Information Processing Systems. 23. 127–135.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.