Stephen Carberry

581 total citations
10 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

Stephen Carberry is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Carberry has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 5 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Stephen Carberry's work include Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (2 papers) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (2 papers). Stephen Carberry is often cited by papers focused on Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (2 papers) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (2 papers). Stephen Carberry collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Austria. Stephen Carberry's co-authors include Seán Doyle, Kevin Kavanagh, Markus Schrettl, Gary W. Jones, Jennifer OʼBrien, Hubertus Haas, John C. Stephens, Sarah M. Barry, Grainne O’Keeffe and Gregory L. Challis and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Infection and Immunity.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Carberry

10 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Carberry Ireland 8 272 174 124 100 50 10 468
Daniela Münch Germany 14 503 1.8× 155 0.9× 72 0.6× 92 0.9× 47 0.9× 14 777
Elke E. E. Noens Netherlands 14 519 1.9× 366 2.1× 163 1.3× 98 1.0× 107 2.1× 16 784
Petra Spröte Germany 9 372 1.4× 238 1.4× 127 1.0× 57 0.6× 54 1.1× 9 604
Joenel Alcantara Canada 11 295 1.1× 105 0.6× 102 0.8× 40 0.4× 22 0.4× 16 522
Anne Lamsa United States 10 413 1.5× 127 0.7× 64 0.5× 49 0.5× 36 0.7× 14 586
Arryn Craney United States 12 308 1.1× 270 1.6× 33 0.3× 136 1.4× 95 1.9× 21 561
Farrell Wymore United States 6 365 1.3× 218 1.3× 136 1.1× 152 1.5× 45 0.9× 8 572
Kathrin Schirner United States 12 479 1.8× 104 0.6× 70 0.6× 76 0.8× 31 0.6× 15 674
Nick Allenby United Kingdom 12 435 1.6× 224 1.3× 82 0.7× 59 0.6× 104 2.1× 24 674
Fang Yun Lim United States 15 384 1.4× 374 2.1× 271 2.2× 159 1.6× 62 1.2× 25 839

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Carberry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Carberry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Carberry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Carberry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Carberry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Carberry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Carberry. The network helps show where Stephen Carberry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Carberry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Carberry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Carberry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Carberry. Stephen Carberry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
McClean, Siobhán, Marc E. Healy, Cassandra Collins, et al.. (2016). Linocin and OmpW Are Involved in Attachment of the Cystic Fibrosis-Associated Pathogen Burkholderia cepacia Complex to Lung Epithelial Cells and Protect Mice against Infection. Infection and Immunity. 84(5). 1424–1437. 45 indexed citations
3.
Carberry, Stephen, Emer L. Molloy, Stephen Hammel, et al.. (2012). Gliotoxin effects on fungal growth: Mechanisms and exploitation. Fungal Genetics and Biology. 49(4). 302–312. 53 indexed citations
4.
Carberry, Stephen, Markus Schrettl, Ishwar Singh, et al.. (2011). The Role of Glutathione S-Transferase GliG in Gliotoxin Biosynthesis in Aspergillus fumigatus. Chemistry & Biology. 18(4). 542–552. 78 indexed citations
5.
Kavanagh, Kevin, et al.. (2011). Single-pot derivatisation strategy for enhanced gliotoxin detection by HPLC and MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 401(8). 2519–2529. 7 indexed citations
6.
Carr, Michael J., et al.. (2011). Recombinant expression and immunological characterisation of proteins derived from human metapneumovirus. Journal of Clinical Virology. 52(3). 236–243. 4 indexed citations
7.
Schrettl, Markus, Stephen Carberry, Kevin Kavanagh, et al.. (2010). Self-Protection against Gliotoxin—A Component of the Gliotoxin Biosynthetic Cluster, GliT, Completely Protects Aspergillus fumigatus Against Exogenous Gliotoxin. PLoS Pathogens. 6(6). e1000952–e1000952. 146 indexed citations
8.
Carberry, Stephen, et al.. (2009). Purification and characterisation of a xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus and its functional expression by Pichia pastoris. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 45(5). 348–354. 31 indexed citations
9.
Carberry, Stephen & Seán Doyle. (2007). Proteomic studies in biomedically and industrially relevant fungi. Cytotechnology. 53(1-3). 95–100. 15 indexed citations
10.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026