Stephen C. Wein

952 total citations
22 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Stephen C. Wein is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen C. Wein has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 18 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 5 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Stephen C. Wein's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (19 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (8 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers). Stephen C. Wein is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (19 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (8 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (5 papers). Stephen C. Wein collaborates with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Stephen C. Wein's co-authors include Christoph Simon, C. Antón, Roohollah Ghobadi, A. Lemaı̂tre, P. Senellart, Abdelmounaïm Harouri, L. Lanco, O. Krebs, I. Sagnes and Martin Esmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Nano Letters.

In The Last Decade

Stephen C. Wein

19 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen C. Wein Canada 10 282 251 127 87 55 22 424
Francesco Basso Basset Italy 12 374 1.3× 288 1.1× 209 1.6× 139 1.6× 56 1.0× 20 518
Demid Sychev United States 10 312 1.1× 240 1.0× 103 0.8× 81 0.9× 46 0.8× 19 416
Michele B. Rota Italy 10 348 1.2× 277 1.1× 183 1.4× 73 0.8× 90 1.6× 17 450
Matthias C. Löbl Switzerland 10 478 1.7× 281 1.1× 309 2.4× 79 0.9× 95 1.7× 16 584
S. Bounouar Germany 7 449 1.6× 301 1.2× 252 2.0× 99 1.1× 81 1.5× 19 543
Sascha R. Valentin Germany 10 399 1.4× 188 0.7× 194 1.5× 56 0.6× 51 0.9× 24 453
S. Lichtmannecker Germany 8 402 1.4× 211 0.8× 288 2.3× 64 0.7× 139 2.5× 9 486
C. L. Salter United Kingdom 5 372 1.3× 225 0.9× 209 1.6× 96 1.1× 54 1.0× 8 441
J. D. Song South Korea 7 437 1.5× 250 1.0× 278 2.2× 71 0.8× 91 1.7× 24 520
Lukas Hanschke Germany 9 301 1.1× 157 0.6× 148 1.2× 52 0.6× 86 1.6× 14 348

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Wein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Wein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Wein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Wein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Wein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Wein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Wein. The network helps show where Stephen C. Wein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen C. Wein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen C. Wein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen C. Wein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen C. Wein. Stephen C. Wein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wein, Stephen C., Abdelmounaïm Harouri, A. Lemaı̂tre, et al.. (2025). Indistinguishability of Remote Quantum-Dot-Cavity Single-Photon Sources. Nano Letters. 25(38). 13979–13987.
2.
Fioretto, Dario, A. Lemaı̂tre, Matthew F. Doty, et al.. (2025). Impact of hole-g-factor anisotropy on spin-photon entanglement generation with (In,Ga)As quantum dots. Physical Review Applied. 24(2).
3.
Wein, Stephen C., et al.. (2025). Erratum: Cavity-assisted controlled phase-flip gates [Phys. Rev. A 102 , 013703 (2020)]. Physical review. A. 112(4).
4.
Wein, Stephen C., Paul Hilaire, Niccolò Somaschi, et al.. (2025). Deterministic and reconfigurable graph state generation with a single solid-state quantum emitter. Nature Communications. 16(1). 4337–4337. 6 indexed citations
5.
Helversen, Martin von, Stephen C. Wein, Saimon Filipe Covre da Silva, et al.. (2024). Exploring photon-number-encoded high-dimensional entanglement from a sequentially excited quantum three-level system. 3(1). 99–99. 2 indexed citations
6.
Wein, Stephen C.. (2024). Simulating photon counting from dynamic quantum emitters by exploiting zero-photon measurements. Physical review. A. 109(2). 5 indexed citations
7.
Esmann, Martin, Stephen C. Wein, & C. Antón. (2024). Solid‐State Single‐Photon Sources: Recent Advances for Novel Quantum Materials. Advanced Functional Materials. 34(30). 39 indexed citations
8.
Hilaire, Paul, et al.. (2024). A Spin-Optical Quantum Computing Architecture. Quantum. 8. 1423–1423. 11 indexed citations
9.
Fioretto, Dario, Nadia Belabas, Stephen C. Wein, et al.. (2023). High-rate entanglement between a semiconductor spin and indistinguishable photons. Nature Photonics. 17(7). 582–587. 69 indexed citations
10.
Wein, Stephen C., et al.. (2023). A DFT study of electron–phonon interactions for the C 2 C N and V N N B defects in hexagonal boron nitride: investigating the role of the transition dipole direction. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 35(38). 385701–385701. 8 indexed citations
11.
Ghobadi, Roohollah, et al.. (2022). Ab initio and group theoretical study of properties of a carbon trimer defect in hexagonal boron nitride. Physical review. B.. 105(18). 29 indexed citations
12.
Wein, Stephen C., et al.. (2022). Proposal for room-temperature quantum repeaters with nitrogen-vacancy centers and optomechanics. Quantum. 6. 669–669. 7 indexed citations
13.
Wein, Stephen C., J. C. Loredo, Maria Maffei, et al.. (2022). Photon-number entanglement generated by sequential excitation of a two-level atom. Nature Photonics. 16(5). 374–379. 28 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, S. E., Stephen C. Wein, Priya Priya, et al.. (2021). Bright Polarized Single-Photon Source Based on a Linear Dipole. Physical Review Letters. 126(23). 233601–233601. 87 indexed citations
15.
Ollivier, H., S. E. Thomas, Stephen C. Wein, et al.. (2021). Hong-Ou-Mandel Interference with Imperfect Single Photon Sources. Physical Review Letters. 126(6). 63602–63602. 51 indexed citations
16.
Wein, Stephen C., et al.. (2020). Quantum repeaters based on individual electron spins and nuclear-spin-ensemble memories in quantum dots. arXiv (Cornell University). 6 indexed citations
17.
Wein, Stephen C., et al.. (2020). Cavity-assisted controlled phase-flip gates. Physical review. A. 102(1). 4 indexed citations
18.
Ghobadi, Roohollah, et al.. (2019). Progress toward cryogen-free spin-photon interfaces based on nitrogen-vacancy centers and optomechanics. Physical review. A. 99(5). 8 indexed citations
19.
Wein, Stephen C., Nikolai Lauk, Roohollah Ghobadi, & Christoph Simon. (2018). Feasibility of efficient room-temperature solid-state sources of indistinguishable single photons using ultrasmall mode volume cavities. Physical review. B.. 97(20). 32 indexed citations
20.
Wein, Stephen C., Khabat Heshami, Christopher Fuchs, et al.. (2016). Efficiency of an enhanced linear optical Bell-state measurement scheme with realistic imperfections. Physical review. A. 94(3). 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026