Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Breyer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Breyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Breyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Breyer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Breyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Breyer. The network helps show where Stephen Breyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Breyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Breyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Breyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Breyer. Stephen Breyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Breyer, Stephen. (2019). INTERNATIONAL CALENDAR MARCH 2019. International Journal of Legal Information. 47(1). 59–67.1 indexed citations
2.
Breyer, Stephen. (2018). The Original U. S. Sentencing Guidelines and Suggestions for a Fairer Future. Hofstra law review. 46(3). 3.1 indexed citations
3.
Breyer, Stephen. (2011). Making Our Democracy Work: The Yale Lectures. The Yale Law Journal. 120(8). 2.1 indexed citations
4.
Breyer, Stephen. (2010). America's Supreme Court: Making Democracy Work. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
Breyer, Stephen. (2006). Reflections on the Role of Appellate Courts: A View from the Supreme Court. 8(1). 91–21.1 indexed citations
7.
Breyer, Stephen, et al.. (2006). Celebrating the courthouse : a guide for architects, their clients, and the public. W.W. Norton eBooks.3 indexed citations
8.
Breyer, Stephen. (2004). IN MEMORIAM: ARCHIBALD COX. Harvard Law Review. 118(1). 1–2.2 indexed citations
9.
Breyer, Stephen, et al.. (2000). Entrevista a Stephen Breyer, juez de la Corte Suprema de EE. UU. Estudios Públicos. 119–147.1 indexed citations
10.
Breyer, Stephen. (1999). Revisión judicial: La perspectiva de un juez. Estudios Públicos. 49–66.1 indexed citations
11.
Karlan, Pamela S. & Stephen Breyer. (1999). In Memoriam: Harry A. Blackmun. Harvard Law Review. 113(1). 1–25.1 indexed citations
Wirth, David A., et al.. (1995). Risky Reform. Columbia Law Review. 95(7). 1857–1857.2 indexed citations
14.
Breyer, Stephen. (1988). The Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the Key Compromises Upon Which They Rest. Hofstra law review. 17(1). 1.33 indexed citations
15.
Breyer, Stephen. (1983). Two Models of Regulatory Reform. Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina). 34(3). 2.2 indexed citations
16.
Breyer, Stephen. (1982). Regulation and Its Reform. Harvard University Press eBooks.259 indexed citations
17.
Gellhorn, Ernest, Stephen Breyer, & Richard B. Stewart. (1980). Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy. Harvard Law Review. 93(6). 1384–1384.40 indexed citations
18.
Breyer, Stephen. (1978). Economics and Law: Discussion. American Economic Review. 68(2). 434–435.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.