Stephen Best

828 total citations
10 papers, 87 citations indexed

About

Stephen Best is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Best has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 87 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ophthalmology, 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 1 paper in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Stephen Best's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers). Stephen Best is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers). Stephen Best collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Stephen Best's co-authors include Andrea L. Vincent, Hussain Y Patel, Helen V. Danesh‐Meyer, Monika Pradhan, Michael S. Vaphiades, David J. King, Paul A. Bell, S A Vernon, Dianne Sharp and Donald Minckler and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Psychopharmacology and Survey of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Best

10 papers receiving 85 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephen Best New Zealand	7	61	32	18	7	6	10	87
M. Nutaitis United States	6	91 1.5×	47 1.5×	33 1.8×	2 0.3×	4 0.7×	8	112
Maureen D. Toomey United States	6	65 1.1×	12 0.4×	14 0.8×	2 0.3×	13 2.2×	8	101
W. Scott Thompson United States	4	226 3.7×	18 0.6×	17 0.9×	7 1.0×	10 1.7×	8	283
Gareth Lema United States	8	105 1.7×	63 2.0×	68 3.8×	9 1.3×	7 1.2×	18	206
Zhenggen Wu China	6	74 1.2×	40 1.3×	37 2.1×	4 0.6×	1 0.2×	16	118
Philip T. Nelsen United States	7	139 2.3×	56 1.8×	30 1.7×	14 2.0×	2 0.3×	10	159
Alan Kwong United States	7	35 0.6×	23 0.7×	71 3.9×	2 0.3×	8 1.3×	9	144
Yutaka Yamada Japan	8	101 1.7×	84 2.6×	24 1.3×	3 0.4×	4 0.7×	22	125
C LÓPEZ DE LA FUENTE Spain	8	150 2.5×	126 3.9×	23 1.3×	7 1.0×	8 1.3×	20	185
Elizabeth Affel United States	6	63 1.0×	44 1.4×	23 1.3×	4 0.6×	3 0.5×	13	85

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Best

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Best more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Best

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Best. The network helps show where Stephen Best may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Best

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Best. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Best based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Best. Stephen Best is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Best, Stephen, et al.. (2018). Forgetting the fundoscope – A case of fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension causing rapid visual loss. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 50. 108–110. 4 indexed citations

2.

Burdon, Kathryn P., Mona S. Awadalla, Paul Mitchell, et al.. (2017). DNA methylation at the 9p21 glaucoma susceptibility locus is associated with normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmic Genetics. 39(2). 221–227. 11 indexed citations

3.

Patel, Hussain Y, et al.. (2011). Screening glaucoma genes in adult glaucoma suggests a multiallelic contribution of CYP1B1 to open‐angle glaucoma phenotypes. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 40(4). e208–17. 20 indexed citations

4.

Pradhan, Monika, Dianne Sharp, Stephen Best, Andrea L. Vincent, & Michael S. Vaphiades. (2010). Drug-induced Optic Neuropathy—TB or Not TB. Survey of Ophthalmology. 55(4). 378–385. 10 indexed citations

5.

Best, Stephen. (2006). Glaucoma Diagnosis and Management. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 34(7). 706–707. 12 indexed citations

6.

Minckler, Donald, Stephen Best, & S A Vernon. (2001). Silicone Oil Glaucoma. Journal of Glaucoma. 10(1). 51–54. 6 indexed citations

7.

Best, Stephen, et al.. (2000). Beta radiation as an adjunct to low‐risk trabeculectomy. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 28(4). 259–262. 9 indexed citations

8.

Orengo-Nania, Silvia, Stephen Best, George L. Spaeth, & Thomas W. Samuelson. (1997). Early Successful Treatment of Postoperative Necrotizing Pseudomonas Scleritis after Trabeculectomy. Journal of Glaucoma. 6(6). 433???435–433???435. 3 indexed citations

9.

Bell, Paul A., et al.. (1992). The McCollough effect as a measure of central cholinergic activity in man. Psychopharmacology. 106(1). 75–84. 8 indexed citations

10.

Cooper, Stephen, Stephen Best, & David J. King. (1987). Can Psychiatric Nurses ‘Catch’ Schizophrenia?. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 151(4). 546–548. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact