Stephanie Töpfner

820 total citations
7 papers, 600 citations indexed

About

Stephanie Töpfner is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Töpfner has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 600 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 5 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Töpfner's work include Pain Management and Treatment (7 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers). Stephanie Töpfner is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Treatment (7 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers). Stephanie Töpfner collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Germany and Bulgaria. Stephanie Töpfner's co-authors include Niels Birbaumer, Werner Lutzenberger, Wolfgang Grodd, Herta Flor, Wolfgang Larbig, Pedro Montoya, K. Unertl, Edward Taub, Katja Wiech and H.-E. Schaller and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and Journal of neurosurgery.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Töpfner

7 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephanie Töpfner Italy	5	372	241	187	175	137	7	600
Ellena Huse Germany	7	420 1.1×	263 1.1×	258 1.4×	179 1.0×	92 0.7×	10	728
Roman Dertwinkel Germany	13	503 1.4×	393 1.6×	330 1.8×	400 2.3×	84 0.6×	25	933
Joseph Maarrawi Lebanon	15	223 0.6×	466 1.9×	173 0.9×	220 1.3×	157 1.1×	36	873
Kate MacIver United Kingdom	6	228 0.6×	142 0.6×	175 0.9×	127 0.7×	47 0.3×	7	417
Caroline Koeppe Germany	6	167 0.4×	173 0.7×	195 1.0×	115 0.7×	31 0.2×	6	454
Katja Witscher Germany	9	169 0.5×	146 0.6×	115 0.6×	380 2.2×	39 0.3×	11	608
Eellan Sivanesan United States	12	406 1.1×	333 1.4×	238 1.3×	215 1.2×	97 0.7×	38	775
Stefanie Förderreuther Germany	16	218 0.6×	281 1.2×	210 1.1×	136 0.8×	133 1.0×	49	920
Aline Patrícia Brietzke Brazil	15	201 0.5×	225 0.9×	155 0.8×	338 1.9×	29 0.2×	26	592
Seigou Koyama Japan	8	513 1.4×	722 3.0×	122 0.7×	714 4.1×	68 0.5×	14	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Töpfner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Töpfner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Töpfner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Töpfner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Töpfner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Töpfner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Töpfner. The network helps show where Stephanie Töpfner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Töpfner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Töpfner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Töpfner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Töpfner. Stephanie Töpfner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Schley, Marcus, Stephanie Töpfner, Katja Wiech, et al.. (2006). Continuous brachial plexus blockade in combination with the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine prevents phantom pain in acute traumatic upper limb amputees. European Journal of Pain. 11(3). 299–308. 87 indexed citations

2.

Wiech, Katja, Stephanie Töpfner, Max Haerle, et al.. (2002). Continuous Brachial Plexus Analgesia and NMDA-receptor Blockade in Early Phantom Limb Pain: A Report of Two Cases. Pain Medicine. 3(2). 156–160. 21 indexed citations

3.

Töpfner, Stephanie, Katja Wiech, Ralph‐Thomas Kiefer, K. Unertl, & Niels Birbaumer. (2001). Phantom limb pain: a report of two cases. European Journal of Pain. 5(4). 449–455. 2 indexed citations

4.

Wiech, Katja, Hubert Preißl, Werner Lutzenberger, et al.. (2000). Cortical reorganization after digit-to-hand replantation. Journal of neurosurgery. 93(5). 876–883. 15 indexed citations

5.

Montoya, Pedro, Ellena Huse, Wolfgang Larbig, et al.. (1998). The cortical somatotopic map and phantom phenomena in subjects with congenital limb atrophy and traumatic amputees with phantom limb pain. European Journal of Neuroscience. 10(3). 1095–1102. 112 indexed citations

6.

Birbaumer, Niels, Anke Karl, W. Lutzenberger, et al.. (1997). Combined transcranial stimulation and neuroelectric source imaging reveal reorganization of somatosensory and motor cortical areas in phantom limb pain. NeuroImage. 5. 4 indexed citations

7.

Birbaumer, Niels, Werner Lutzenberger, Pedro Montoya, et al.. (1997). Effects of Regional Anesthesia on Phantom Limb Pain Are Mirrored in Changes in Cortical Reorganization. Journal of Neuroscience. 17(14). 5503–5508. 359 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact