Stephanie L. Barrow
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery top 10%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Alexei V. TepikinOle H. PetersenOleg V. GerasimenkoSvetlana VoroninaRobert SuttonDavid N. CriddleMichael ChvanovA. Kimberley McAllister
- Topics
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (6 papers)Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stephanie L. Barrow
14 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Molecular Biology 554
- Surgery 475
- Cell Biology 179
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 165
- Epidemiology 154
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie L. Barrow
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie L. Barrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie L. Barrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie L. Barrow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie L. Barrow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie L. Barrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie L. Barrow. The network helps show where Stephanie L. Barrow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie L. Barrow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie L. Barrow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie L. Barrow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie L. Barrow. Stephanie L. Barrow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 60 | |
| 4 | 109 | |
| 5 | 85 | |
| 6 | 108 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 34 | |
| 10 | 132 | |
| 11 | 49 | |
| 12 | 207 | |
| 13 | 284 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 103 |
About Stephanie L. Barrow
Stephanie L. Barrow is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (6 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (5 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (103 citations), Sensory Systems (69 citations) and Cell Biology (179 citations). Stephanie L. Barrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexei V. Tepikin, Ole H. Petersen, Oleg V. Gerasimenko, Svetlana Voronina, Robert Sutton, David N. Criddle, Michael Chvanov, A. Kimberley McAllister, Stuart Gillies and John P. Neoptolemos. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.