Stephanie Freeman

446 total citations
30 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Stephanie Freeman is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Freeman has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Social Psychology, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Freeman's work include Open Source Software Innovations (8 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers) and Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (5 papers). Stephanie Freeman is often cited by papers focused on Open Source Software Innovations (8 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (5 papers) and Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (5 papers). Stephanie Freeman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Finland. Stephanie Freeman's co-authors include Jouni K. Juntunen, Sampsa Hyysalo, Robert S. Hoffman, Charles F. Nadler, B. Derrick Taff, Peter Newman, Zachary D. Miller, Mikael Johnson, Jacob A. Benfield and Ben Lawhon and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Energy Policy and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Freeman

27 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephanie Freeman United States 8 80 68 68 55 52 30 336
Claudia Göbel Germany 7 79 1.0× 35 0.5× 22 0.3× 36 0.7× 26 0.5× 18 319
Minna Halonen Finland 9 113 1.4× 34 0.5× 15 0.2× 19 0.3× 33 0.6× 16 310
Ellen‐Marie Forsberg Norway 13 173 2.2× 116 1.7× 11 0.2× 138 2.5× 17 0.3× 42 564
Sara Heitlinger United Kingdom 13 97 1.2× 183 2.7× 28 0.4× 23 0.4× 4 0.1× 20 567
Mara Balestrini United Kingdom 12 86 1.1× 100 1.5× 69 1.0× 11 0.2× 5 0.1× 22 402
Sascha Dickel Germany 12 141 1.8× 46 0.7× 51 0.8× 25 0.5× 4 0.1× 41 360
Javier Echeverría Spain 10 79 1.0× 21 0.3× 41 0.6× 48 0.9× 12 0.2× 39 401
Julio César Acosta Prado Colombia 12 73 0.9× 39 0.6× 24 0.4× 55 1.0× 43 0.8× 85 457
Sergio Zúñiga-Jara Chile 14 26 0.3× 44 0.6× 20 0.3× 103 1.9× 126 2.4× 52 530
Michiel Van Oudheusden Belgium 12 179 2.2× 80 1.2× 11 0.2× 111 2.0× 7 0.1× 42 459

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Freeman. The network helps show where Stephanie Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Freeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Freeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Freeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Freeman. Stephanie Freeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Freeman, Stephanie, et al.. (2023). The Impact of Message Framing on Wildlife Approach During Ungulate Viewing Experiences in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Journal of Interpretation Research. 28(1). 7–24. 5 indexed citations
2.
Taff, B. Derrick, Zachary D. Miller, Ben Lawhon, Stephanie Freeman, & Peter Newman. (2022). Effective Communication and Campground Recycling: Lessons Learned from Yosemite, Grand Teton, and Denali National Parks. Land. 11(10). 1872–1872. 1 indexed citations
3.
Teel, Tara L., Brett L. Bruyere, Ashley A. Dayer, et al.. (2022). Reenvisioning the university education needs of wildlife conservation professionals in the United States. Conservation Science and Practice. 4(2). 6 indexed citations
4.
Agans, Jennifer P., et al.. (2022). “Pick your team wisely”: A case study of a long-standing research-practice partnership. Evaluation and Program Planning. 95. 102169–102169. 6 indexed citations
5.
Rice, William L., Nathan Reigner, Stephanie Freeman, et al.. (2021). The impact of protective masks on outdoor recreation crowding norms during a pandemic. Journal of Leisure Research. 53(3). 340–356. 7 indexed citations
6.
D’Antonio, Ashley, Christopher Monz, Derrick Taff, et al.. (2021). What's ‘SUP’ with paddlers? Integrating spatial, social, and ecological data to understand behavior among paddlesport users at a popular lake destination. Applied Geography. 135. 102531–102531. 3 indexed citations
8.
Freeman, Stephanie, B. Derrick Taff, Zachary D. Miller, Jacob A. Benfield, & Peter Newman. (2021). Mutualism Wildlife Value Orientations Predict Support for Messages About Distance-Related Wildlife Conflict. Environmental Management. 67(5). 920–929. 8 indexed citations
9.
Freeman, Stephanie, B. Derrick Taff, Zachary D. Miller, Jacob A. Benfield, & Peter Newman. (2021). Acceptability factors for wildlife approach in park and protected area settings. Journal of Environmental Management. 286. 112276–112276. 6 indexed citations
10.
Freeman, Stephanie, Zachary D. Miller, & B. Derrick Taff. (2020). Visual-Based Social Norms, Distance-Related Human–Wildlife Interactions, and Viewing Devices in Parks and Protected Areas. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5 indexed citations
11.
Hyysalo, Sampsa, et al.. (2014). INTERMEDIATE SEARCH ELEMENTS AND METHOD COMBINATION IN LEAD-USER SEARCHES. International Journal of Innovation Management. 19(1). 1550007–1550007. 21 indexed citations
12.
Freeman, Stephanie. (2014). The Making of an Accidental Crisis: The United States and the NATO Dual-Track Decision of 1979. Diplomacy and Statecraft. 25(2). 331–355. 3 indexed citations
13.
Hyysalo, Sampsa, Jouni K. Juntunen, & Stephanie Freeman. (2013). Hyysalo, Juntunen & Freeman: Internet Forums and the Rise of the Inventive Energy User. Science & Technology Studies. 28(1). 1 indexed citations
14.
Hyysalo, Sampsa, Jouni K. Juntunen, & Stephanie Freeman. (2013). Internet Forums and the Rise of the Inventive Energy User. Science & Technology Studies. 26(1). 25–51. 57 indexed citations
15.
Johnson, Mikael, et al.. (2013). Mountaineering – A Combinatory Approach for Identifying Lead Users and Other Rare Research Subjects. Aaltodoc (Aalto University). 1 indexed citations
16.
Freeman, Stephanie. (2011). Constructing a Community : Myths and Realities of the Open Development Model. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja. 4 indexed citations
17.
Hoffman, Robert S., et al.. (1985). System Atics of the Holarctic Chipmunks (Tamias). Journal of Mammalogy. 66(2). 219–242. 51 indexed citations
18.
Freeman, Stephanie. (1974). Energy: The new era. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 9 indexed citations
19.
Freeman, Stephanie. (1973). The Energy Joyride Is Over. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 29(8). 39–40. 2 indexed citations
20.
Freeman, Stephanie. (1973). Is There an Energy Crisis? An Overview. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 410(1). 1–10.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026