Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Elzer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Elzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Elzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Elzer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Elzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Elzer. The network helps show where Stephanie Elzer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Elzer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Elzer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Elzer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Elzer. Stephanie Elzer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wu, Peng, et al.. (2011). Abstractive Summarization of Line Graphs from Popular Media. 41–48.3 indexed citations
2.
Wu, Peng, Sandra Carberry, Kathleen McCoy, et al.. (2011). Improving the Accessibility of Line Graphs in Multimodal Documents. 52–62.6 indexed citations
3.
Burns, Richard J., Sandra Carberry, & Stephanie Elzer. (2010). Visual and spatial factors in a Bayesian reasoning framework for the recognition of intended messages in grouped bar charts. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 6–13.5 indexed citations
Elzer, Stephanie, et al.. (2009). Utilizing Microsoft robotics studio in undergraduate robotics. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 24(3). 65–71.2 indexed citations
9.
Burns, Richard J., Sandra Carberry, & Stephanie Elzer. (2009). Modeling Relative Task Effort for Grouped Bar Charts. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31).4 indexed citations
10.
Elzer, Stephanie, Edward J. Schwartz, Sandra Carberry, et al.. (2008). Accessible bar charts for visually impaired users. 55–60.6 indexed citations
Elzer, Stephanie, Sandra Carberry, Ingrid Zukerman, et al.. (2005). A probabilistic framework for recognizing intention in information graphics. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1042–1047.21 indexed citations
Carberry, Sandra, et al.. (2004). Extending Document Summarization to Information Graphics. 3–9.8 indexed citations
18.
Elzer, Stephanie, Nancy Green, & Sandra Carberry. (2003). Exploiting Cognitive Psychology Research for Recognizing Intention in Information Graphics. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 25(25).5 indexed citations
19.
Carberry, Sandra, et al.. (2003). Understanding Information Graphics: A Discourse-Level Problem.. Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 1–12.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.