Stephanie E. King

915 citations
21 papers · 687 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephanie E. King

19 papers receiving 679 citations

Peers

Stephanie E. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 152
  • Pollution 108
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 146
  • Reproductive Medicine 56
  • Aging 11
Replace Leo F. Doherty with:
Leo F. Doherty United States
Andrea Rowan‐Carroll Canada
Huan Shen China
Laura Alessandra Favetta Canada
Aurore Gély-Pernot France
Edmundo Bonilla Mexico
Tanvi Doshi India
Pernille Rosenskjold Jacobsen Denmark
Mary C. Gieske United States
Marta Lombó Spain
Stephanie E. King relative to Leo F. Doherty United States Leo F. Doherty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
Leo F. Doherty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie E. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie E. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie E. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie E. King. The network helps show where Stephanie E. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephanie E. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephanie E. King Line = papers co-authored together Stephanie E. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019166
2 2017118
3 2020114
4 201872
5 201946
6 201938
7 199325
8 201919
9 201618
10 202317
11 199515
12 199510
13 202310
14 19939
15 20255
16 19932
17 19941
18 19961
19 20251
20 20250

About Stephanie E. King

Stephanie E. King is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Behavioral Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Safety Research, having authored 21 papers that have together received 687 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (9 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (7 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (2 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (152 citations), Pollution (108 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (146 citations), Reproductive Medicine (56 citations) and Aging (11 citations). Stephanie E. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Michael K. Skinner, Eric E. Nilsson, Daniel Beck, Ingrid Sadler‐Riggleman, Deepika Kubsad, Margaux McBirney, Paul Winchester, Settara C. Chandrasekharappa, Millissia Ben Maamar and Francis S. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as Genomics, Current Zoology, PLoS ONE, Developmental Biology and Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact