Stephanie C. Kerr

848 total citations
9 papers, 587 citations indexed

About

Stephanie C. Kerr is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie C. Kerr has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 587 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Plant Science, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Stephanie C. Kerr's work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (6 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Stephanie C. Kerr is often cited by papers focused on Plant Molecular Biology Research (6 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Stephanie C. Kerr collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Japan and China. Stephanie C. Kerr's co-authors include Christine A. Beveridge, Elizabeth A. Dun, François Barbier, Philip B. Brewer, Fiona Filardo, Kohki Akiyama, Steven M. Smith, Kaori Yoneyama, Mark T. Waters and Emma Meyers and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and The Plant Journal.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie C. Kerr

8 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephanie C. Kerr Australia 7 556 237 227 21 17 9 587
Jo Hepworth United Kingdom 12 1.2k 2.1× 539 2.3× 494 2.2× 26 1.2× 41 2.4× 17 1.2k
Yunting Lei China 10 351 0.6× 115 0.5× 122 0.5× 40 1.9× 22 1.3× 13 413
Elisabeth Otto Germany 3 570 1.0× 82 0.3× 419 1.8× 25 1.2× 38 2.2× 3 641
Uwe Mohr Switzerland 7 311 0.6× 99 0.4× 84 0.4× 21 1.0× 27 1.6× 10 352
Karin van de Sande Netherlands 8 644 1.2× 254 1.1× 262 1.2× 38 1.8× 25 1.5× 9 675
Linda Zamariola Belgium 5 359 0.6× 47 0.2× 222 1.0× 13 0.6× 38 2.2× 8 417
Tomasz Książczyk Poland 11 381 0.7× 110 0.5× 173 0.8× 10 0.5× 75 4.4× 17 418
Ting Liao China 11 310 0.6× 43 0.2× 240 1.1× 37 1.8× 15 0.9× 29 367
José Fernández Gómez United Kingdom 5 325 0.6× 47 0.2× 310 1.4× 14 0.7× 22 1.3× 6 367
David Lalanne France 13 718 1.3× 45 0.2× 319 1.4× 19 0.9× 31 1.8× 17 784

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie C. Kerr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie C. Kerr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie C. Kerr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie C. Kerr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie C. Kerr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie C. Kerr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie C. Kerr. The network helps show where Stephanie C. Kerr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie C. Kerr

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie C. Kerr. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie C. Kerr based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie C. Kerr. Stephanie C. Kerr is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Kerr, Stephanie C., Lindsay M. Shaw, Miloš Tanurdžić, et al.. (2024). Advancing tree genomics to future proof next generation orchard production. Frontiers in Plant Science. 14. 1321555–1321555.
2.
Cao, Da, François Barbier, Elizabeth A. Dun, et al.. (2023). Auxin-independent effects of apical dominance induce changes in phytohormones correlated with bud outgrowth. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 192(2). 1420–1434. 45 indexed citations
3.
Kerr, Stephanie C., Peter J. Prentis, Miloš Tanurdžić, et al.. (2022). Horticultural innovation by viral-induced gene regulation of carotenogenesis. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 6 indexed citations
4.
Fichtner, Franziska, François Barbier, Stephanie C. Kerr, et al.. (2021). Plasticity of bud outgrowth varies at cauline and rosette nodes in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 188(3). 1586–1603. 12 indexed citations
5.
Kerr, Stephanie C., S. B. Patil, Alexandre de Saint Germain, et al.. (2021). Integration of the SMXL/D53 strigolactone signalling repressors in the model of shoot branching regulation in Pisum sativum. The Plant Journal. 107(6). 1756–1770. 38 indexed citations
6.
Barbier, François, et al.. (2019). An Update on the Signals Controlling Shoot Branching. Trends in Plant Science. 24(3). 220–236. 258 indexed citations
7.
Kerr, Stephanie C., Federico Gaiti, & Miloš Tanurdžić. (2019). De Novo Plant Transcriptome Assembly and Annotation Using Illumina RNA-Seq Reads. Methods in molecular biology. 1933. 265–275. 12 indexed citations
8.
Kerr, Stephanie C., Federico Gaiti, Christine A. Beveridge, & Miloš Tanurdžić. (2017). De novo transcriptome assembly reveals high transcriptional complexity in Pisum sativum axillary buds and shows rapid changes in expression of diurnally regulated genes. BMC Genomics. 18(1). 221–221. 19 indexed citations
9.
Brewer, Philip B., Kaori Yoneyama, Fiona Filardo, et al.. (2016). LATERAL BRANCHING OXIDOREDUCTASEacts in the final stages of strigolactone biosynthesis inArabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(22). 6301–6306. 197 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026