417 total citations 42 papers, 168 citations indexed
About
Stéphane Polis is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Archeology and Artificial Intelligence.
According to data from OpenAlex, Stéphane Polis has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 168 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Language and Linguistics, 22 papers in Archeology and 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Stéphane Polis's work include Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (22 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (15 papers) and Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (10 papers). Stéphane Polis is often cited by papers focused on Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (22 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (15 papers) and Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (10 papers). Stéphane Polis collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Israel and Greece. Stéphane Polis's co-authors include Eitan Grossman, Jean-Marie Klinkenberg and António Loprieno and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Language and Linguistics Compass and Linguistic Typology.
In The Last Decade
Stéphane Polis
33 papers
receiving
158 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Polis
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Polis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Polis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Polis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Polis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Polis. The network helps show where Stéphane Polis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stéphane Polis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stéphane Polis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stéphane Polis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stéphane Polis. Stéphane Polis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Polis, Stéphane, et al.. (2022). A Family Affair in the Community of Deir el-Medina:Gossip Girls in two 19th Dynasty Letters. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).1 indexed citations
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis. (2017). Overall borrowing and borrowing in basic vocabulary: A typological perspective on lexical change in Ancient Egyptian-Coptic. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
Polis, Stéphane, et al.. (2015). The Hieroglyphic Sign Functions. Suggestions for a Revised Taxonomy. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).3 indexed citations
7.
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis. (2015). Dispreferred structures through language change: the diachrony of affix ordering in Ancient Egyptian - Coptic. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
8.
Grossman, Eitan, et al.. (2014). Contexts and Inferences. The grammaticalization of the Later Egyptian Allative Future. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
9.
Grossman, Eitan, et al.. (2014). On Forms and Functions: Studies in Ancient Egyptian Grammar.4 indexed citations
10.
Polis, Stéphane, et al.. (2013). Building a Construction-Based Treebank of Late Egyptian. The Syntactic Layer in Ramsès. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
11.
Polis, Stéphane, et al.. (2013). The Ramses project : Methodology and practices in the annotation of Late Egyptian Texts. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis. (2012). Navigating polyfunctionality in the lexicon. Semantic maps and Ancient Egyptian lexical semantics. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).5 indexed citations
Polis, Stéphane, et al.. (2010). The Ramses Project: Review and Perspectives. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).
16.
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis. (2010). How to get to the future without a verb of motion (or metaphors). The emergence of the Allative Future in Old Egyptian. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
17.
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis. (2010). On the Pragmatics of Subjectification: Emergence and Modalization of an Allative Future in Ancient Egyptian. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. 46(1). 251–[60].
18.
Grossman, Eitan & Stéphane Polis. (2009). Navigating Polyfunctionality in the Lexicon. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
19.
Polis, Stéphane. (2009). Interaction entre modalité et subjectivité en néo-égyptien. Autour de la construction mri + iw circ. "souhaiter que". 17.
20.
Polis, Stéphane. (2008). Langue et réalité. De l’usage de l’iconicité en linguistique. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège). 1.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.