Steph Forrester

1.6k total citations
78 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Steph Forrester is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Steph Forrester has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, 55 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 10 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Steph Forrester's work include Sports Performance and Training (53 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (38 papers) and Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics (26 papers). Steph Forrester is often cited by papers focused on Sports Performance and Training (53 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (38 papers) and Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics (26 papers). Steph Forrester collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and United States. Steph Forrester's co-authors include Paul Fleming, Chris D. Rielly, Sam J. Allen, Matthew T.G. Pain, Jonathan P. Folland, Joseph C. Handsaker, Matthew I. Black, Jonathan Roberts, Keith Carpenter and Mark A. King and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.

In The Last Decade

Steph Forrester

74 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steph Forrester United Kingdom 19 705 602 104 92 89 78 1.2k
Winson C.C. Lee Hong Kong 20 555 0.8× 294 0.5× 250 2.4× 17 0.2× 254 2.9× 59 1.1k
Neil J. Mansfield United Kingdom 30 335 0.5× 1.5k 2.5× 122 1.2× 164 1.8× 82 0.9× 111 2.7k
Wolfgang Potthast Germany 24 1.3k 1.8× 842 1.4× 512 4.9× 25 0.3× 406 4.6× 137 2.1k
Olga Troynikov Australia 19 322 0.5× 75 0.1× 68 0.7× 43 0.5× 21 0.2× 70 1.1k
Hans Chaudhry United States 14 220 0.3× 168 0.3× 164 1.6× 26 0.3× 164 1.8× 40 722
Michael Damsgaard Denmark 17 1.4k 2.0× 433 0.7× 808 7.8× 59 0.6× 267 3.0× 55 2.2k
Mark de Zee Denmark 26 1.7k 2.4× 727 1.2× 967 9.3× 59 0.6× 312 3.5× 121 3.0k
Michael Skipper Andersen Denmark 27 1.9k 2.7× 654 1.1× 1.3k 12.9× 98 1.1× 431 4.8× 165 3.1k
Kathleen M. Knutzen United States 17 765 1.1× 634 1.1× 220 2.1× 23 0.3× 201 2.3× 32 1.4k
Thomas Stöggl Austria 34 825 1.2× 2.6k 4.4× 201 1.9× 12 0.1× 231 2.6× 171 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Steph Forrester

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steph Forrester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steph Forrester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steph Forrester more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steph Forrester

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steph Forrester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steph Forrester. The network helps show where Steph Forrester may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steph Forrester

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steph Forrester. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steph Forrester based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steph Forrester. Steph Forrester is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
3.
Fleming, Paul, et al.. (2023). Understanding the variability in rotational traction testing on artificial turf. Sports Engineering. 26(1). 3 indexed citations
4.
Fleming, Paul, et al.. (2023). The effect of rotational velocity on rotational traction across a range of artificial turf surface systems. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 21631–21631. 3 indexed citations
5.
Fleming, Paul, et al.. (2023). Comparison of player perceptions to mechanical measurements of third generation synthetic turf football surfaces. Sports Engineering. 26(1). 2 indexed citations
6.
Forrester, Steph, et al.. (2021). Objective assessment of surgeon kinematics during simulated laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary evaluation of the effect of high body mass index models. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 17(1). 75–83. 8 indexed citations
7.
Forrester, Steph, et al.. (2020). The influence of tracking marker locations on three-dimensional wrist kinematics. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 23(10). 985–990. 3 indexed citations
8.
Kryger, Katrine Okholm, Séan Mitchell, & Steph Forrester. (2019). Assessment of the accuracy of different systems for measuring football velocity and spin rate in the field. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 233(2). 324–330. 7 indexed citations
9.
Folland, Jonathan P., Sam J. Allen, Matthew I. Black, Joseph C. Handsaker, & Steph Forrester. (2017). Running Technique is an Important Component of Running Economy and Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 49(7). 1412–1423. 174 indexed citations
10.
Kryger, Katrine Okholm, et al.. (2016). Can subjective comfort be used as a measure of plantar pressure in football boots?. Journal of Sports Sciences. 35(10). 953–959. 12 indexed citations
11.
Fleming, Paul, et al.. (2016). Skin friction related behaviour of artificial turf systems. Journal of Sports Sciences. 35(15). 1500–1507. 3 indexed citations
12.
Fleming, Paul, et al.. (2015). Understanding the effects of decompaction maintenance on the infill state and play performance of third-generation artificial grass pitches. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 229(3). 169–182. 17 indexed citations
13.
Forrester, Steph, et al.. (2014). The effect of running velocity on footstrike angle – A curve-clustering approach. Gait & Posture. 41(1). 26–32. 43 indexed citations
14.
Forrester, Steph, et al.. (2014). Spatial and temporal analysis of surface hardness across a third-generation artificial turf pitch over a year. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part P Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 228(3). 213–220. 10 indexed citations
15.
Forrester, Steph & Matthew T.G. Pain. (2010). A Combined Muscle Model and Wavelet Approach to Interpreting the Surface EMG Signals from Maximal Dynamic Knee Extensions. Journal of Applied Biomechanics. 26(1). 62–72. 8 indexed citations
16.
Forrester, Steph, et al.. (2010). Neuromuscular function in healthy occlusion. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 37(9). 663–669. 43 indexed citations
17.
Forrester, Steph, Maurice R. Yeadon, Mark A. King, & Matthew T.G. Pain. (2010). Comparing different approaches for determining joint torque parameters from isovelocity dynamometer measurements. Journal of Biomechanics. 44(5). 955–961. 44 indexed citations
18.
Pain, Matthew T.G. & Steph Forrester. (2009). Predicting maximum eccentric strength from surface EMG measurements. Journal of Biomechanics. 42(11). 1598–1603. 13 indexed citations
19.
Yeadon, Maurice R., Mark A. King, Steph Forrester, Graham E. Caldwell, & Matthew T.G. Pain. (2009). The need for muscle co-contraction prior to a landing. Journal of Biomechanics. 43(2). 364–369. 32 indexed citations
20.
Forrester, Steph, et al.. (2004). Compressible flow analysis: discharging vessels. Chemical Engineering Education. 38(3). 190–195. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026