Countries citing papers authored by Steffen Hölldobler
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Steffen Hölldobler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffen Hölldobler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffen Hölldobler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steffen Hölldobler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffen Hölldobler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffen Hölldobler. The network helps show where Steffen Hölldobler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steffen Hölldobler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steffen Hölldobler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steffen Hölldobler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Steffen Hölldobler. Steffen Hölldobler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (2021). When are Humans Reasoning with Modus Tollens. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 43(43).
2.
Hölldobler, Steffen. (2018). Ethical Decision Making under the Weak Completion Semantics.. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1.1 indexed citations
3.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (2017). A Computational Logic Approach to Human Syllogistic Reasoning.. Cognitive Science.7 indexed citations
4.
Ragni, Marco, et al.. (2016). Two-Valued Logic is Not Sufficient to Model Human Reasoning, but Three-Valued Logic is: A Formal Analysis.. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 61–73.1 indexed citations
5.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (2016). Syllogistic Reasoning under the Weak Completion Semantics.. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 5–19.1 indexed citations
6.
Pereira, Luı́s Moniz, et al.. (2014). An abductive reasoning approach to the belief-bias effect. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 653–656.5 indexed citations
7.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (2011). An Abductive Model for Human Reasoning. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.8 indexed citations
8.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (2011). A short overview on modern parallel SAT-solvers. 201–206.13 indexed citations
Hölldobler, Steffen. (1996). Equational Logic and Theories of Action.. 111–126.1 indexed citations
14.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (1994). Ein massiv paralleles Modell für die Logikprogrammierung.. 25(5). 89–92.3 indexed citations
15.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (1993). Disjunction in resource-oriented deductive planning. International Conference on Logic Programming. 670.6 indexed citations
16.
Hölldobler, Steffen & Michael Thielscher. (1993). Actions and specificity. International Conference on Logic Programming. 164–180.13 indexed citations
17.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (1993). On the adequateness of the connection method. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 9–14.2 indexed citations
18.
Hölldobler, Steffen, et al.. (1992). Equational Logic Programming, Actions, and Change. 177–191.10 indexed citations
19.
Hölldobler, Steffen. (1990). A structured connectionist unification algorithm. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 587–593.13 indexed citations
20.
Hölldobler, Steffen. (1988). From Paramodulation to Narrowing.. International Conference on Lightning Protection. 327–342.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.