Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis
2019231 citationsGil Yosipovitch, Matthew Reaney et al.British Journal of Dermatologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan Plaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan Plaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan Plaum more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan Plaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan Plaum. The network helps show where Stefan Plaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefan Plaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefan Plaum.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefan Plaum based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stefan Plaum. Stefan Plaum is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yosipovitch, Gil, Matthew Reaney, Vera Mastey, et al.. (2019). Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis. British Journal of Dermatology. 181(4). 761–769.231 indexed citations breakdown →
Plaum, Stefan, et al.. (2013). Detection and relevance of naftifine hydrochloride in the stratum corneum up to four weeks following the last application of naftifine cream and gel, 2%.. PubMed. 12(9). 1004–8.8 indexed citations
10.
Vlahovic, Tracey C., et al.. (2013). Efficacy and safety of naftifine HCl Gel 2% in the treatment of interdigital and moccasin type tinea pedis: pooled results from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials.. PubMed. 12(8). 911–8.6 indexed citations
11.
Draelos, Zoé Kececioglu, et al.. (2012). A new proprietary onion extract gel improves the appearance of new scars: a randomized, controlled, blinded-investigator study.. PubMed. 5(6). 18–24.19 indexed citations
12.
Gold, Michael H., et al.. (2012). An open-label pilot study of naftifine 1% gel in the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis of the scalp.. PubMed. 11(4). 514–8.3 indexed citations
13.
Parish, Lawrence Charles, et al.. (2011). A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled efficacy and safety study of naftifine 2% cream in the treatment of tinea pedis.. PubMed. 10(11). 1282–8.10 indexed citations
Parish, Lawrence Charles, et al.. (2011). A double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of naftifine 2% cream in tinea cruris.. PubMed. 10(10). 1142–7.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.