Stefan G. Schreiber

1.6k total citations
20 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Stefan G. Schreiber is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Stefan G. Schreiber has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 5 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Stefan G. Schreiber's work include Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (8 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (5 papers). Stefan G. Schreiber is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (8 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (5 papers). Stefan G. Schreiber collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Stefan G. Schreiber's co-authors include Uwe G. Hacke, Andreas Hamann, Lenka Plavcová, Rachel Spicer, Barb R. Thomas, Jean Sébastien Brouard, David R. Roberts, Sanja Schreiber, Tim J. Arciszewski and David Montwé and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, New Phytologist and Journal of Applied Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Stefan G. Schreiber

20 papers receiving 633 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stefan G. Schreiber Canada 10 437 280 243 234 88 20 649
Xianchong Wan China 18 437 1.0× 190 0.7× 183 0.8× 351 1.5× 70 0.8× 38 705
Heinz Coners Germany 12 377 0.9× 261 0.9× 184 0.8× 167 0.7× 61 0.7× 22 607
Pilar Pita Spain 16 511 1.2× 254 0.9× 203 0.8× 378 1.6× 38 0.4× 25 764
C. Leuschner Germany 9 379 0.9× 300 1.1× 241 1.0× 171 0.7× 48 0.5× 13 589
Heidi J. Renninger United States 16 609 1.4× 304 1.1× 218 0.9× 173 0.7× 31 0.4× 51 749
Daniel J. Chmura Poland 12 572 1.3× 449 1.6× 215 0.9× 254 1.1× 39 0.4× 35 851
J. L. Medhurst Australia 13 502 1.1× 493 1.8× 196 0.8× 210 0.9× 120 1.4× 16 760
Elena Cubera Spain 14 291 0.7× 290 1.0× 120 0.5× 422 1.8× 46 0.5× 17 858
Andrea Foetzki China 13 390 0.9× 213 0.8× 183 0.8× 368 1.6× 97 1.1× 20 736
Jennifer M. R. Peters Australia 13 522 1.2× 182 0.7× 237 1.0× 324 1.4× 36 0.4× 15 664

Countries citing papers authored by Stefan G. Schreiber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan G. Schreiber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan G. Schreiber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan G. Schreiber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stefan G. Schreiber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan G. Schreiber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan G. Schreiber. The network helps show where Stefan G. Schreiber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefan G. Schreiber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefan G. Schreiber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefan G. Schreiber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stefan G. Schreiber. Stefan G. Schreiber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Thomas, Barb R., Michael Stoehr, Stefan G. Schreiber, et al.. (2024). Tree Improvement in Canada – past, present and future, 2023 and beyond. The Forestry Chronicle. 100(1). 59–87. 4 indexed citations
3.
Degenhardt, Dani, et al.. (2023). Growth and survival of native wetland species in shallow capped centrifuged tailings and co-mixed tailings: a meso-scale greenhouse study. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 103(4). 538–555. 4 indexed citations
4.
Degenhardt, Dani, et al.. (2023). Growth and survival of native upland and wetland species in shallow capped thickened tailings: a meso-scale greenhouse study. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 103(4). 567–617. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Fraser, Erin, et al.. (2022). Assessing Ecological Recovery of Reclaimed Well Sites: A Case Study From Alberta, Canada. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 5. 2 indexed citations
7.
Schreiber, Stefan G., et al.. (2022). Statistical tools for water quality assessment and monitoring in river ecosystems – a scoping review and recommendations for data analysis. Water Quality Research Journal. 57(1). 40–57. 35 indexed citations
8.
Jones, C. Eugene, et al.. (2022). Use of Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) to Monitor Vegetation Recovery on Linear Disturbances. Forests. 13(11). 1743–1743. 6 indexed citations
9.
Roth‐Nebelsick, Anita, et al.. (2022). Foliar water uptake in Pinus species depends on needle age and stomatal wax structures. Annals of Botany. 131(2). 287–300. 7 indexed citations
10.
Schreiber, Stefan G., et al.. (2020). Manipulating aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedling size characteristics to improve initial establishment and growth on competitive sites. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 35(1-2). 29–45. 1 indexed citations
11.
Montwé, David, et al.. (2019). Seasonal Vascular Tissue Formation in Four Boreal Tree Species With a Focus on Callose Deposition in the Phloem. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 2. 11 indexed citations
12.
Schreiber, Stefan G., et al.. (2017). Post-glacial biogeography of trembling aspen inferred from habitat models and genetic variance in quantitative traits. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 4672–4672. 12 indexed citations
13.
14.
Thomas, Barb R., et al.. (2016). Impact of planting container type on growth and survival of three hybrid poplar clones in central Alberta, Canada. New Forests. 47(6). 815–827. 9 indexed citations
15.
Hacke, Uwe G., Rachel Spicer, Stefan G. Schreiber, & Lenka Plavcová. (2016). An ecophysiological and developmental perspective on variation in vessel diameter. Plant Cell & Environment. 40(6). 831–845. 247 indexed citations
16.
Schreiber, Stefan G., et al.. (2015). Leaf size serves as a proxy for xylem vulnerability to cavitation in plantation trees. Plant Cell & Environment. 39(2). 272–281. 27 indexed citations
17.
Schreiber, Stefan G., Uwe G. Hacke, & Andreas Hamann. (2015). Variation of xylem vessel diameters across a climate gradient: insight from a reciprocal transplant experiment with a widespread boreal tree. Functional Ecology. 29(11). 1392–1401. 80 indexed citations
18.
Schreiber, Stefan G., et al.. (2013). Frost hardiness vs. growth performance in trembling aspen: an experimental test of assisted migration. Journal of Applied Ecology. 50(4). 939–949. 65 indexed citations
19.
Schreiber, Stefan G., Andreas Hamann, Uwe G. Hacke, & Barb R. Thomas. (2012). Sixteen years of winter stress: an assessment of cold hardiness, growth performance and survival of hybrid poplar clones at a boreal planting site. Plant Cell & Environment. 36(2). 419–428. 56 indexed citations
20.
Schreiber, Stefan G., Uwe G. Hacke, Andreas Hamann, & Barb R. Thomas. (2011). Genetic variation of hydraulic and wood anatomical traits in hybrid poplar and trembling aspen. New Phytologist. 190(1). 150–160. 58 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Xianchong Wan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heinz Coners Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Pilar Pita Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. Leuschner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heidi J. Renninger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel J. Chmura Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. L. Medhurst Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elena Cubera Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Foetzki Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer M. R. Peters
Rankless by CCL
2026