Stanley F. Patten

1.0k total citations
30 papers, 755 citations indexed

About

Stanley F. Patten is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Artificial Intelligence and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stanley F. Patten has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 755 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Epidemiology, 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Stanley F. Patten's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (15 papers), AI in cancer detection (8 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers). Stanley F. Patten is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (15 papers), AI in cancer detection (8 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers). Stanley F. Patten collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Stanley F. Patten's co-authors include Thomas A. Bonfiglio, James W. Reagan, Jerome H. Rudolph, Bowen E. Keller, Michael Feldstein, Omar M. Salazar, Janet C. Dickinson, David C. Wilbur, Ralph M. Richart and Terrence J. Colgan and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Stanley F. Patten

28 papers receiving 685 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stanley F. Patten United States	15	321	299	146	145	114	30	755
Koss Lg United States	16	230 0.7×	186 0.6×	121 0.8×	126 0.9×	243 2.1×	72	930
Paul Elgert United States	15	455 1.4×	167 0.6×	97 0.7×	28 0.2×	110 1.0×	36	599
Paul J. J. M. Klinkhamer Netherlands	12	688 2.1×	127 0.4×	52 0.4×	51 0.4×	321 2.8×	14	854
Mary T. Galgano United States	12	212 0.7×	124 0.4×	263 1.8×	87 0.6×	138 1.2×	14	752
Terry Colgan United States	8	209 0.7×	157 0.5×	134 0.9×	28 0.2×	89 0.8×	10	418
Shinichi Tsuchiya Japan	7	91 0.3×	83 0.3×	49 0.3×	74 0.5×	48 0.4×	15	347
John Panayiotides Greece	14	229 0.7×	61 0.2×	27 0.2×	55 0.4×	112 1.0×	28	509
J. S. Dinnen United Kingdom	6	291 0.9×	35 0.1×	27 0.2×	35 0.2×	102 0.9×	7	497
Patricia M. Baker Canada	14	95 0.3×	357 1.2×	367 2.5×	257 1.8×	98 0.9×	24	822
L G Koss United States	13	46 0.1×	82 0.3×	53 0.4×	184 1.3×	105 0.9×	31	469

Countries citing papers authored by Stanley F. Patten

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stanley F. Patten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stanley F. Patten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanley F. Patten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stanley F. Patten

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stanley F. Patten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stanley F. Patten. The network helps show where Stanley F. Patten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stanley F. Patten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stanley F. Patten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stanley F. Patten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stanley F. Patten. Stanley F. Patten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Patten, Stanley F., et al.. (1998). An experimental study of the relationship between Trichomonas vaginalis and dysplasia in the uterine cervix.. PubMed. 7. 187–90.

Patten, Stanley F., et al.. (1997). The AutoPap 300 QC system multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears. Cancer. 81(6). 337–342. 39 indexed citations

Patten, Stanley F., David C. Wilbur, Thomas A. Bonfiglio, et al.. (1997). The AutoPap 300 QC system multicenter clinical trials for use in quality control rescreening of cervical smears. Cancer. 81(6). 343–347. 32 indexed citations

Colgan, Terence J., et al.. (1997). AutoPap 300 QC System Scoring of Cervical Smears Without “Epithelial Cell Abnormalities”. Acta Cytologica. 41(1). 45–49. 2 indexed citations

Kuan, Leonard, et al.. (1997). AutoPap System Performance in Screening for Low Prevalence and Small Cell Abnormalities. Acta Cytologica. 41(1). 56–64. 14 indexed citations

Colgan, Terence J., et al.. (1997). Enhancing the Performance of the AutoPap 300 QC System with Optimal Staining and Presentation of Cervical Smears. Acta Cytologica. 41(1). 50–55. 4 indexed citations

Richart, Ralph M., et al.. (1996). PROSPECTS FOR AUTOMATED CYTOLOGY. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 23(4). 853–859. 1 indexed citations

Wilbur, David C., et al.. (1996). Sensitivity of the AutoPap 300 QC System for Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities. Acta Cytologica. 40(1). 127–132. 34 indexed citations

Patten, Stanley F., et al.. (1996). NeoPath, Inc.. Acta Cytologica. 40(1). 45–52. 25 indexed citations

10.

Wheeless, Leon L., Stanley F. Patten, Jay E. Reeder, et al.. (1986). Multidimensional slit‐scan detection of bladder cancer preliminary clinical results. Cytometry. 7(2). 212–216. 11 indexed citations

11.

Wheeless, Leon L., et al.. (1984). Multidimensional slit‐scan prescreening system: Preliminary results of a single blind clinical study,. Cytometry. 5(1). 1–8. 23 indexed citations

12.

Wheeless, Leon L., et al.. (1979). False alarms in a slit-scan flow system: causes and occurrence rates. Implications and potential solutions.. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 27(1). 596–599. 13 indexed citations

13.

Wheeless, Leon L., et al.. (1977). Imaging systems for correlation of false alarms in flow.. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. 25(7). 864–869. 12 indexed citations

14.

Hicklin, Martin D., Stanley L. Inhorn, Leopold G. Koss, et al.. (1974). Standards of Adequacy of Cytologic Examination of the Female Genital Tract. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 61(2). 285–286. 11 indexed citations

15.

Hicklin, Martin D., Stanley L. Inhorn, Leopold G. Koss, et al.. (1973). Conclusions of study group on standards of adequacy of cytologic examination of the female genital tract. Gynecologic Oncology. 1(3). 271–273. 2 indexed citations

16.

Hicklin, Martin D., Stanley L. Inhorn, Leopold G. Koss, et al.. (1973). Standards of adequacy of cytologic examination of the female genital tract. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 117(6). 863–864. 4 indexed citations

17.

Patten, Stanley F.. (1969). Diagnostic cytopathology of the uterine cervix. S. Karger eBooks. 49 indexed citations

18.

Patten, Stanley F., et al.. (1963). Postirradiation dysplasia of uterine cervix and vagina: An analytical study of the cells. Cancer. 16(2). 173–182. 22 indexed citations

19.

Reagan, James W. & Stanley F. Patten. (1961). ANALYTIC STUDY OF CELLULAR CHANGES IN CARCINOMA IN SITU, SQUAMOUS-CELL CANCER, AND ADENOCARCINOMA OF UTERINE CERVIX. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology. 4(4). 1097–1127. 13 indexed citations

20.

Patten, Stanley F.. (1960). Renewal of the intestinal epithelium of the Urodele. Experimental Cell Research. 20(3). 638–641. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact