Stanley F. Patten
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Thomas A. BonfiglioJames W. ReaganOmar M. SalazarMichael FeldsteinBowen E. KellerJerome H. RudolphDavid C. WilburJanet C. Dickinson
- Topics
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (15 papers)AI in cancer detection (8 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers)
- Journals
- CancerAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Stanley F. Patten
28 papers receiving 685 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Epidemiology 321
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 299
- Reproductive Medicine 146
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 145
- Oncology 114
Countries citing papers authored by Stanley F. Patten
This map shows the geographic impact of Stanley F. Patten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stanley F. Patten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanley F. Patten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stanley F. Patten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stanley F. Patten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stanley F. Patten. The network helps show where Stanley F. Patten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stanley F. Patten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stanley F. Patten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stanley F. Patten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stanley F. Patten. Stanley F. Patten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | An experimental study of the relationship between Trichomonas vaginalis and dysplasia in the uterine cervix. | 0 |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 155 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | Diagnostic cytopathology of the uterine cervix | 49 |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Stanley F. Patten
Stanley F. Patten is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology and Biophysics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (15 papers), AI in cancer detection (8 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (299 citations), Reproductive Medicine (146 citations) and Epidemiology (321 citations). Stanley F. Patten has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Bonfiglio, James W. Reagan, Omar M. Salazar, Michael Feldstein, Bowen E. Keller, Jerome H. Rudolph, David C. Wilbur, Janet C. Dickinson, Ralph M. Richart and Terrence J. Colgan. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.