Stan C. Hokanson

2.1k total citations
85 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Stan C. Hokanson is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stan C. Hokanson has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 71 papers in Plant Science, 27 papers in Cell Biology and 17 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Stan C. Hokanson's work include Berry genetics and cultivation research (31 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (27 papers) and Plant Disease Management Techniques (20 papers). Stan C. Hokanson is often cited by papers focused on Berry genetics and cultivation research (31 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (27 papers) and Plant Disease Management Techniques (20 papers). Stan C. Hokanson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Germany. Stan C. Hokanson's co-authors include James R. McFerson, Warren F. Lamboy, Amy K. Szewc‐McFadden, James F. Hancock, Richard Jensen, Vance M. Whitaker, J. G. Isebrands, Fumiomi Takeda, Rebecca Grumet and Andrew R. Jamieson and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecological Applications, Frontiers in Plant Science and Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Stan C. Hokanson

80 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stan C. Hokanson United States 20 1.2k 453 422 218 205 85 1.4k
W.V. Baird United States 25 1.5k 1.2× 838 1.8× 342 0.8× 212 1.0× 305 1.5× 57 1.9k
Leen Leus Belgium 22 1.1k 0.9× 876 1.9× 214 0.5× 134 0.6× 315 1.5× 87 1.4k
Philip L. Forsline United States 20 814 0.7× 384 0.8× 300 0.7× 90 0.4× 189 0.9× 42 965
M. Woodhead United Kingdom 18 768 0.6× 384 0.8× 158 0.4× 271 1.2× 163 0.8× 32 1.1k
Cláudio Brondani Brazil 24 1.4k 1.2× 323 0.7× 241 0.6× 796 3.7× 136 0.7× 72 1.8k
G.L. Reighard United States 26 2.5k 2.0× 1.4k 3.0× 386 0.9× 195 0.9× 216 1.1× 152 2.7k
Dora Batista Portugal 21 805 0.7× 446 1.0× 436 1.0× 86 0.4× 74 0.4× 43 1.1k
Marcus Linde Germany 20 910 0.7× 551 1.2× 230 0.5× 209 1.0× 235 1.1× 55 1.2k
Kelly Vining United States 18 866 0.7× 610 1.3× 142 0.3× 127 0.6× 89 0.4× 43 1.1k
Timothy A. Rinehart United States 20 586 0.5× 379 0.8× 168 0.4× 218 1.0× 188 0.9× 64 911

Countries citing papers authored by Stan C. Hokanson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stan C. Hokanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan C. Hokanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan C. Hokanson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stan C. Hokanson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan C. Hokanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan C. Hokanson. The network helps show where Stan C. Hokanson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stan C. Hokanson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stan C. Hokanson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stan C. Hokanson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stan C. Hokanson. Stan C. Hokanson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clark, Matthew D., et al.. (2021). Horticultural Characterization of Wild Hydrangea quercifolia Seedlings Collected Throughout the Species Native Range. HortScience. 56(9). 1023–1033. 2 indexed citations
2.
Zlesak, David C., et al.. (2020). An Updated Host Differential Due to Two Novel Races of Diplocarpon rosae Wolf, the Causal Agent of Rose Black Spot Disease. HortScience. 55(11). 1756–1758. 2 indexed citations
3.
4.
Zurn, Jason D., et al.. (2018). Mapping a Novel Black Spot Resistance Locus in the Climbing Rose Brite Eyes™ (‘RADbrite’). Frontiers in Plant Science. 9. 1730–1730. 25 indexed citations
5.
Bradeen, James M., et al.. (2016). Towards Broader Adaptability of North American Deciduous Azaleas. Arnoldia.. 74(2). 15–27. 2 indexed citations
6.
Hokanson, Stan C., et al.. (2015). Aurantioporthe corni gen. et comb. nov., an endophyte and pathogen of Cornus alternifolia. Mycologia. 107(1). 66–79. 17 indexed citations
7.
Wadl, Phillip A., Xinwang Wang, John K. Moulton, et al.. (2010). Transfer of Cornus florida and C. kousa Simple Sequence Repeats to Selected Cornus (Cornaceae) Species. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 135(3). 279–288. 10 indexed citations
8.
Krebs, Stephen L., et al.. (2010). Field and Growth Chamber Evaluation of Powdery Mildew Disease on Deciduous Azaleas. HortScience. 45(5). 784–789. 3 indexed citations
9.
Zlesak, David C., et al.. (2010). Evaluation of Roses from the Earth-Kind® Trials: Black Spot (Diplocarpon rosae Wolf) Resistance and Ploidy. HortScience. 45(12). 1779–1787. 13 indexed citations
10.
Whitaker, Vance M., Stan C. Hokanson, & James M. Bradeen. (2007). Distribution of Rose Black Spot (Diplocarpon rosae) Genetic Diversity in Eastern North America Using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism and Implications for Resistance Screening. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 132(4). 534–540. 14 indexed citations
11.
Hokanson, Stan C., et al.. (2005). Intersimple Sequence Repeat Fingerprinting and Genetic Variation in a Collection of Clematis Cultivars and Commercial Germplasm. HortScience. 40(7). 1982–1987. 16 indexed citations
12.
Black, Brent, Stan C. Hokanson, & Kim S. Lewers. (2005). Fruit Nitrogen Content of Sixteen Strawberry Genotypes Grown in an Advanced Matted Row Production System. HortScience. 40(5). 1190–1193. 2 indexed citations
13.
Krebs, Stephen L., et al.. (2004). Susceptibility of Deciduous Azalea Cultivars to Powdery Mildew Disease. HortScience. 39(4). 773A–773.
14.
Maas, John L., et al.. (2000). Sources of Resistance for Two Differentially Pathogenic Strains of Xanthomonas fragariae in Fragaria Genotypes. HortScience. 35(1). 128–131. 19 indexed citations
15.
Maas, John L., et al.. (1998). Injury to Strawberry Crowns Caused by European Corn Borer Larvae. HortScience. 33(5). 866–867. 1 indexed citations
16.
Aldwinckle, Herb S., et al.. (1997). Evaluation of Apple Scab Resistance of Malus sieversii Populations from Central Asia. HortScience. 32(3). 440A–440. 7 indexed citations
17.
Hokanson, Stan C., Amy K. Szewc‐McFadden, Warren F. Lamboy, & James R. McFerson. (1997). Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Variation in a Collection of Malus Species and Hybrids. HortScience. 32(3). 440C–440. 4 indexed citations
18.
Hokanson, Stan C., et al.. (1996). Development of in Situ and ex Situ Conservation Strategies for Malus Wild Germplasm in Kazakhstan. HortScience. 31(4). 619d–619. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hokanson, Stan C., James F. Hancock, & Rebecca Grumet. (1995). Characterization of the Blunt Leaf Apex (bla) Trait in Cucumber. HortScience. 30(7). 1461–1462. 1 indexed citations
20.
Hancock, J. F., et al.. (1992). Performance of Californian and Eastern U.S. Strawberry Cultivars under Conditions Mimicking Eastern Production Systems. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 117(6). 991–995. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026