Stacy Ho
Impact in
-
- Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
-
- Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Papers in
-
- Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods 7
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Hong Gao (1 shared paper)Thomas J. O’Shea (3 shared papers)Walter A. Korfmacher (3 shared papers)Jie Wang (3 shared papers)Mark G. Qian (1 shared paper)J. Cory Kalvass (1 shared paper)Avijit Ghosh (1 shared paper)Paul Harradine (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Bioanalysis (6 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (1 paper)Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (1 paper)Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (1 paper)Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyJapan
In The Last Decade
Stacy Ho
10 papers receiving 154 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Pharmacology 25
- Immunology 51
- Small Animals 15
- Pharmacology 30
- Statistics and Probability 13
Countries citing papers authored by Stacy Ho
This map shows the geographic impact of Stacy Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacy Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacy Ho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stacy Ho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacy Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacy Ho. The network helps show where Stacy Ho may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacy Ho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 1 |
About Stacy Ho
Stacy Ho is a scholar working on Immunology, Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 155 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods (7 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (1 paper) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (25 citations), Immunology (51 citations), Small Animals (15 citations), Pharmacology (30 citations) and Statistics and Probability (13 citations). Stacy Ho has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Hong Gao, Thomas J. O’Shea, Walter A. Korfmacher, Jie Wang, Mark G. Qian, J. Cory Kalvass, Avijit Ghosh, Paul Harradine, Susanna Tse and Maciej J. Zamek‐Gliszczynski. Their work appears in journals such as Bioanalysis, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.