Spee Kosloff
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jeff GreenbergMark J. LandauBrian L. BurkeDavid WeiseSheldon SolomonAndy MartensTom PyszczynskiToni Schmader
- Topics
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (17 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological SciencePersonality and Social Psychology BulletinJournal of Experimental Psychology General
- Partner nations
- United StatesNew ZealandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Spee Kosloff
25 papers receiving 709 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Social Psychology 510
- Sociology and Political Science 355
- Clinical Psychology 236
- Applied Psychology 136
- Cognitive Neuroscience 132
Countries citing papers authored by Spee Kosloff
This map shows the geographic impact of Spee Kosloff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spee Kosloff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spee Kosloff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Spee Kosloff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Spee Kosloff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Spee Kosloff. The network helps show where Spee Kosloff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Spee Kosloff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Spee Kosloff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Spee Kosloff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Spee Kosloff. Spee Kosloff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | How our means for feeling transcendent of death foster prejudice, stereotyping, and intergroup conflict: Terror management theory. | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 132 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 73 | |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Spee Kosloff
Spee Kosloff is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (17 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (136 citations), Social Psychology (510 citations) and Clinical Psychology (236 citations). Spee Kosloff has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeff Greenberg, Mark J. Landau, Brian L. Burke, David Weise, Sheldon Solomon, Andy Martens, Tom Pyszczynski, Toni Schmader, Florette Cohen and Jamie Arndt. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Science, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.