Soni Lacefield

805 total citations
30 papers, 529 citations indexed

About

Soni Lacefield is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Soni Lacefield has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 529 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Molecular Biology, 24 papers in Cell Biology and 9 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Soni Lacefield's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (23 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (17 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (13 papers). Soni Lacefield is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (23 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (17 papers) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (13 papers). Soni Lacefield collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Soni Lacefield's co-authors include Dai Tsuchiya, Andrew W. Murray, Frank Solomon, R. Scott Hawley, Rachael L. French, Christina Boulton, Kristin Herman, Kara E. Koehler, Yang Yang and Margaret Magendantz and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Genetics, The Journal of Cell Biology and Nature Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Soni Lacefield

28 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Soni Lacefield United States 15 455 273 180 65 41 30 529
Tadashi Ishiguro Japan 6 305 0.7× 185 0.7× 100 0.6× 29 0.4× 43 1.0× 11 367
Sarah J. Radford United States 14 405 0.9× 227 0.8× 151 0.8× 69 1.1× 12 0.3× 20 479
Sandra A. Touati France 12 444 1.0× 345 1.3× 162 0.9× 33 0.5× 54 1.3× 17 570
Aurora Storlazzi Italy 12 665 1.5× 125 0.5× 255 1.4× 105 1.6× 16 0.4× 16 713
Bahtiyar Kurtulmus Germany 11 301 0.7× 196 0.7× 46 0.3× 118 1.8× 11 0.3× 12 365
Barry E. McGuinness Austria 2 409 0.9× 334 1.2× 124 0.7× 33 0.5× 47 1.1× 5 474
Jeffrey J. Tung United States 9 347 0.8× 241 0.9× 171 0.9× 30 0.5× 8 0.2× 13 538
Vijayalakshmi V. Subramanian United States 7 326 0.7× 101 0.4× 83 0.5× 74 1.1× 34 0.8× 8 372
Sylvie Genier France 8 868 1.9× 292 1.1× 442 2.5× 47 0.7× 14 0.3× 8 912
Helena Kashevsky United States 8 325 0.7× 80 0.3× 64 0.4× 81 1.2× 13 0.3× 9 359

Countries citing papers authored by Soni Lacefield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Soni Lacefield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Soni Lacefield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Soni Lacefield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Soni Lacefield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Soni Lacefield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Soni Lacefield. The network helps show where Soni Lacefield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Soni Lacefield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Soni Lacefield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Soni Lacefield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Soni Lacefield. Soni Lacefield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lacefield, Soni, et al.. (2025). Aneuploidy of specific chromosomes is beneficial to cells lacking spindle checkpoint protein Bub3. PLoS Genetics. 21(2). e1011576–e1011576.
2.
Goods, Brittany A., et al.. (2025). Disrupted MOS signaling alters meiotic cell cycle regulation and the egg transcriptome. Reproduction. 170(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Lacefield, Soni, et al.. (2023). Meiotic cells escape prolonged spindle checkpoint activity through kinetochore silencing and slippage. PLoS Genetics. 19(4). e1010707–e1010707. 1 indexed citations
4.
Blengini, Cecilia S., et al.. (2023). Distinct Aurora B pools at the inner centromere and kinetochore have different contributions to meiotic and mitotic chromosome segregation. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 34(5). ar43–ar43. 6 indexed citations
5.
Trinidad, Jonathan C., et al.. (2022). Identification of 14-3-3 proteins, Polo kinase, and RNA-binding protein Pes4 as key regulators of meiotic commitment in budding yeast. Current Biology. 32(7). 1534–1547.e9. 9 indexed citations
6.
Lacefield, Soni, et al.. (2022). High-throughput genetic screening of meiotic commitment using fluorescence microscopy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. STAR Protocols. 3(4). 101797–101797. 1 indexed citations
7.
Denic, Vladimir, et al.. (2020). Autophagy prevents runaway meiotic divisions. Autophagy. 16(5). 969–970. 4 indexed citations
8.
Wang, Fei, Rudian Zhang, Wenzhi Feng, et al.. (2020). Autophagy of an Amyloid-like Translational Repressor Regulates Meiotic Exit. Developmental Cell. 52(2). 141–151.e5. 23 indexed citations
9.
Lacefield, Soni, et al.. (2020). Differential requirement for Bub1 and Bub3 in regulation of meiotic versus mitotic chromosome segregation. The Journal of Cell Biology. 219(4). 17 indexed citations
10.
Lacefield, Soni, et al.. (2019). The DNA Damage Checkpoint and the Spindle Position Checkpoint Maintain Meiotic Commitment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Current Biology. 29(3). 449–460.e2. 5 indexed citations
11.
Lacefield, Soni, et al.. (2019). The DNA damage checkpoint and the spindle position checkpoint: guardians of meiotic commitment. Current Genetics. 65(5). 1135–1140. 10 indexed citations
13.
Tsuchiya, Dai & Soni Lacefield. (2013). Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis. Current Biology. 23(16). 1505–1513. 18 indexed citations
14.
Tsuchiya, Dai, et al.. (2011). The spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates APC/C activity during prometaphase and metaphase of meiosis I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 22(16). 2848–2861. 28 indexed citations
15.
Lacefield, Soni, et al.. (2009). Recruiting a microtubule-binding complex to DNA directs chromosome segregation in budding yeast. Nature Cell Biology. 11(9). 1116–1120. 48 indexed citations
16.
Lacefield, Soni & Andrew W. Murray. (2007). The spindle checkpoint rescues the meiotic segregation of chromosomes whose crossovers are far from the centromere. Nature Genetics. 39(10). 1273–1277. 44 indexed citations
17.
Lacefield, Soni & Nicholas T. Ingolia. (2006). Signal Transduction: External Signals Influence Spore-Number Control. Current Biology. 16(4). R125–R127. 2 indexed citations
18.
Lacefield, Soni, Margaret Magendantz, & Frank Solomon. (2006). Consequences of Defective Tubulin Folding on Heterodimer Levels, Mitosis and Spindle Morphology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 173(2). 635–646. 19 indexed citations
19.
Lacefield, Soni & Frank Solomon. (2003). A Novel Step in β-Tubulin Folding Is Important for Heterodimer Formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 165(2). 531–541. 32 indexed citations
20.
Koehler, Kara E., Christina Boulton, Rachael L. French, et al.. (1996). Spontaneous X chromosome MI and MII nondisjunction events in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes have different recombinational histories. Nature Genetics. 14(4). 406–414. 116 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026