S.J.T. Jansen

2.1k total citations
57 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

S.J.T. Jansen is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, S.J.T. Jansen has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in S.J.T. Jansen's work include Housing Market and Economics (13 papers), Place Attachment and Urban Studies (11 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (8 papers). S.J.T. Jansen is often cited by papers focused on Housing Market and Economics (13 papers), Place Attachment and Urban Studies (11 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (8 papers). S.J.T. Jansen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and China. S.J.T. Jansen's co-authors include Anne M. Stiggelbout, M. Nooij, J. Kievit, Wilma Otten, Peter Boelhouwer, Evert M. Noordijk, Peter P. Wakker, Bo Li, H. van Slooten and Henny Coolen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

S.J.T. Jansen

54 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S.J.T. Jansen Netherlands 25 529 337 258 201 160 57 1.6k
Malcolm Eames United Kingdom 21 225 0.4× 382 1.1× 188 0.7× 86 0.4× 192 1.2× 61 1.9k
Allen C. Goodman United States 30 2.6k 5.0× 504 1.5× 197 0.8× 97 0.5× 124 0.8× 95 3.5k
Liyang Sun United States 9 1.4k 2.6× 557 1.7× 351 1.4× 77 0.4× 32 0.2× 24 3.0k
Scott Hawken Australia 20 173 0.3× 124 0.4× 147 0.6× 38 0.2× 93 0.6× 54 1.7k
Robin Haynes United Kingdom 30 449 0.8× 235 0.7× 769 3.0× 402 2.0× 102 0.6× 75 2.7k
Richard L. Morrill United States 29 740 1.4× 808 2.4× 283 1.1× 39 0.2× 268 1.7× 135 2.9k
Stephen H. Linder United States 24 315 0.6× 523 1.6× 280 1.1× 45 0.2× 33 0.2× 71 2.2k
Jenny Morris United Kingdom 34 157 0.3× 961 2.9× 803 3.1× 341 1.7× 48 0.3× 106 4.2k
Matthias Beck United Kingdom 22 233 0.4× 143 0.4× 96 0.4× 57 0.3× 79 0.5× 98 1.8k
Leif Jensen United States 28 589 1.1× 1.6k 4.7× 857 3.3× 58 0.3× 28 0.2× 96 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by S.J.T. Jansen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.J.T. Jansen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.J.T. Jansen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.J.T. Jansen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.J.T. Jansen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.J.T. Jansen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.J.T. Jansen. The network helps show where S.J.T. Jansen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S.J.T. Jansen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S.J.T. Jansen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S.J.T. Jansen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S.J.T. Jansen. S.J.T. Jansen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Li, Bo, et al.. (2024). Promoting the private rented sector in metropolitan China: key challenges and solutions. International Journal of Housing Policy. 25(5). 774–805. 4 indexed citations
4.
Li, Bo, et al.. (2023). Understanding the Housing Pathways and Migration Plans of Young Talents in Metropolises–A Case Study of Shenzhen. Housing Theory and Society. 40(4). 435–462. 10 indexed citations
5.
Li, Bo, et al.. (2023). Understanding the relationship between residential environment, social exclusion, and life satisfaction of private renters in Shenzhen. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 38(4). 2449–2472. 15 indexed citations
6.
Pieters, Wolter, et al.. (2021). Biases in security risk management: Do security professionals follow prospect theory in their decisions?. Radboud Repository (Radboud University).
7.
Jansen, S.J.T.. (2020). Urban, suburban or rural? Understanding preferences for the residential environment. Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability. 13(2). 213–235. 26 indexed citations
8.
Straub, Ad, E. Mlecnik, S.J.T. Jansen, & Nico Nieboer. (2014). Customer segments and value propositions in the nZEB single-family housing renovation market. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology). 3 indexed citations
9.
Jansen, S.J.T.. (2012). Why is Housing Always Satisfactory? A Study into the Impact of Preference and Experience on Housing Appreciation. Social Indicators Research. 113(3). 785–805. 48 indexed citations
10.
Jansen, S.J.T.. (2012). What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices?. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 27(3). 273–300. 43 indexed citations
11.
Jansen, S.J.T., et al.. (2007). Developing a House Price Index for the Netherlands: A Practical Application of Weighted Repeat Sales. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations
12.
Jansen, S.J.T., et al.. (2007). Stability of preferences with regard to adjuvant chemotherapy: impact of treatment decision, experience and the passing of time. European Journal of Cancer Care. 0(0). 1771964768–???. 3 indexed citations
13.
Stiggelbout, Anne M., et al.. (2006). How important is the opinion of significant others to cancer patients’ adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making?. Supportive Care in Cancer. 15(3). 319–325. 35 indexed citations
14.
Jansen, S.J.T., Wilma Otten, Cornelis J.�H. van de Velde, J.W.R. Nortier, & Anne M. Stiggelbout. (2004). The impact of the perception of treatment choice on satisfaction with treatment, experienced chemotherapy burden and current quality of life. British Journal of Cancer. 91(1). 56–61. 44 indexed citations
15.
Jansen, S.J.T., J. Kievit, M. Nooij, et al.. (2001). Patients’ preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?. British Journal of Cancer. 84(12). 1577–1585. 73 indexed citations
16.
Jansen, S.J.T., et al.. (2001). Stability of Patients' Preferences for Chemotherapy: The Impact of Experience. Medical Decision Making. 21(4). 295–306. 54 indexed citations
17.
Jansen, S.J.T., Anne M. Stiggelbout, M. Nooij, & J. Kievit. (2000). The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment. Quality of Life Research. 9(5). 541–557. 17 indexed citations
18.
Jansen, S.J.T., Anne M. Stiggelbout, M. Nooij, Evert M. Noordijk, & J. Kievit. (2000). Response shift in quality of life measurement in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Quality of Life Research. 9(6). 603–615. 92 indexed citations
19.
Jansen, S.J.T., Anne M. Stiggelbout, Peter P. Wakker, et al.. (2000). Unstable Preferences:. Medical Decision Making. 20(1). 62–71. 79 indexed citations
20.
Jansen, S.J.T., Anne M. Stiggelbout, Peter P. Wakker, et al.. (1998). Patients' Utilities for Cancer Treatments. Medical Decision Making. 18(4). 391–399. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Malcolm Eames Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Allen C. Goodman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Liyang Sun Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Scott Hawken Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robin Haynes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard L. Morrill Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Stephen H. Linder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jenny Morris Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthias Beck Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leif Jensen
Rankless by CCL
2026