S.J. Stanworth

1.0k total citations
27 papers, 705 citations indexed

About

S.J. Stanworth is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Biochemistry and Hematology. According to data from OpenAlex, S.J. Stanworth has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 705 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, 10 papers in Biochemistry and 7 papers in Hematology. Recurrent topics in S.J. Stanworth's work include Blood transfusion and management (10 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (10 papers) and Blood disorders and treatments (5 papers). S.J. Stanworth is often cited by papers focused on Blood transfusion and management (10 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (10 papers) and Blood disorders and treatments (5 papers). S.J. Stanworth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. S.J. Stanworth's co-authors include Richard Pumphrey, Christopher Hyde, Alison Jones, Janet Burton, D. Peckham, Helen Chapel, Philip Wood, Michael Desborough, M. F. Murphy and H. Boralessa and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Molecular and Cellular Biology and Gut.

In The Last Decade

S.J. Stanworth

25 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
S.J. Stanworth United Kingdom 12 209 167 165 130 126 27 705
Susan Nahirniak Canada 14 87 0.4× 298 1.8× 357 2.2× 170 1.3× 15 0.1× 45 1.1k
Alice K. Fuller United States 16 107 0.5× 477 2.9× 504 3.1× 118 0.9× 11 0.1× 21 926
H. Hambley United Kingdom 18 90 0.4× 88 0.5× 446 2.7× 36 0.3× 9 0.1× 35 795
P. Renaudier France 12 125 0.6× 181 1.1× 71 0.4× 117 0.9× 10 0.1× 28 519
Ulrik Sprogøe Denmark 13 38 0.2× 73 0.4× 251 1.5× 51 0.4× 8 0.1× 35 559
Taswell Hf United States 12 68 0.3× 120 0.7× 103 0.6× 64 0.5× 6 0.0× 23 541
G. D. Poole United Kingdom 11 79 0.4× 256 1.5× 472 2.9× 111 0.9× 4 0.0× 19 783
Douglas W. Huestis United States 12 64 0.3× 94 0.6× 236 1.4× 41 0.3× 6 0.0× 52 496
Ben Saxon Australia 12 38 0.2× 51 0.3× 356 2.2× 25 0.2× 5 0.0× 37 690
Éva Ajzner Hungary 17 72 0.3× 27 0.2× 361 2.2× 25 0.2× 5 0.0× 43 824

Countries citing papers authored by S.J. Stanworth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S.J. Stanworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S.J. Stanworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S.J. Stanworth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S.J. Stanworth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S.J. Stanworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S.J. Stanworth. The network helps show where S.J. Stanworth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of S.J. Stanworth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of S.J. Stanworth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of S.J. Stanworth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with S.J. Stanworth. S.J. Stanworth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Raza, Syed Arsalan, et al.. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Transfusion Medicine: Addressing the Challenges of Clinical Adoption. Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 40(1). 150961–150961.
2.
Lorencatto, Fabiana, Nick Gould, S.J. Stanworth, et al.. (2017). Are current audit and feedback interventions to change UK blood transfusion practice theory- and evidence-based?. European Health Psychologist. 19. 1156. 1 indexed citations
3.
Desborough, Michael, Kathryn Oakland, Giovanni Landoni, et al.. (2016). Desmopressin for treatment of platelet dysfunction and reversal of antiplatelet agents: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 15(2). 263–272. 86 indexed citations
4.
Desborough, Michael, S.J. Stanworth, & N Curry. (2013). Uses and abuses of fresh frozen plasma for the treatment of bleeding. Clinical Medicine. 13(2). 200–202. 5 indexed citations
5.
Desborough, Michael & S.J. Stanworth. (2013). Uses and abuses of fresh-frozen plasma for the prophylaxis of bleeding. Clinical Medicine. 13(2). 197–199. 8 indexed citations
6.
Jairath, Vipul, David P. Hall, Pille Harrison, et al.. (2012). OC-069 Rotational thromboelastometry in cirrhosis: hypercoagulable and hyperfibrinolytic. Gut. 61(Suppl 2). A30.1–A30. 2 indexed citations
7.
Hall, David P., Nazir Lone, Douglas Watson, S.J. Stanworth, & Timothy Walsh. (2012). Factors associated with prophylactic plasma transfusion before vascular catheterization in non-bleeding critically ill adults with prolonged prothrombin time: a case–control study. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 109(6). 919–927. 17 indexed citations
9.
Hyde, Christopher, S.J. Stanworth, & M. F. Murphy. (2008). Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews 2. Analysis of the combined results from the included studies. Transfusion. 48(4). 580–583. 6 indexed citations
10.
Stanworth, S.J., Christopher Hyde, & M. F. Murphy. (2007). Evidence for indications of fresh frozen plasma. Transfusion Clinique et Biologique. 14(6). 551–556. 39 indexed citations
11.
Benjamin, Sylvia, et al.. (2007). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials for plasma exchange in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Transfusion Medicine. 17(1). 17–35. 63 indexed citations
12.
Hyde, Christopher, S.J. Stanworth, & M. F. Murphy. (2007). Can you see the wood for the trees? Making sense of forest plots in systematic reviews. Transfusion. 48(2). 218–220. 8 indexed citations
13.
Stanworth, S.J., et al.. (2006). Appraisal of the evidence for the clinical use of FFP and plasma fractions. Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology. 19(1). 67–82. 24 indexed citations
14.
Stanworth, S.J., et al.. (2005). Diagnosis of transfusion‐associated graft‐vs.‐host disease: the importance of short tandem repeat analysis. Transfusion Medicine. 15(6). 481–485. 20 indexed citations
15.
Stanworth, S.J., et al.. (2002). Which groups of patients are transfused? A study of red cell usage in London and southeast England. Vox Sanguinis. 83(4). 352–357. 68 indexed citations
16.
Stanworth, S.J., et al.. (2001). Severe haemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti‐Jsb. Vox Sanguinis. 81(2). 134–135. 4 indexed citations
17.
Stanworth, S.J., et al.. (2000). Haemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti‐Ce. Transfusion Medicine. 10(4). 305–306. 4 indexed citations
19.
Stanworth, S.J., Nigel Roberts, J A Sharpe, & W. G. Wood. (1996). Gene expression in somatic cell hybrids derived from embryonic mice transgenic for human globin genes. British Journal of Haematology. 94(4). 631–638. 2 indexed citations
20.
Stanworth, S.J., Nigel Roberts, J A Sharpe, Jacqueline A. Sloane-Stanley, & W. G. Wood. (1995). Established Epigenetic Modifications Determine the Expression of Developmentally Regulated Globin Genes in Somatic Cell Hybrids. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 15(8). 3969–3978. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026