Simone Prömel

2.4k total citations
35 papers, 979 citations indexed

About

Simone Prömel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Aging. According to data from OpenAlex, Simone Prömel has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 979 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Molecular Biology, 20 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 10 papers in Aging. Recurrent topics in Simone Prömel's work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (18 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (11 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (10 papers). Simone Prömel is often cited by papers focused on Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (18 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (11 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (10 papers). Simone Prömel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Simone Prömel's co-authors include Tobias Langenhan, Torsten Schöneberg, Andreas Russ, Jana Barbro Winkler, Ioannis Vakonakis, Ralf Schnabel, Demet Araç, Sven Rothemund, Ines Liebscher and Helen Waller‐Evans and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Simone Prömel

33 papers receiving 978 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Simone Prömel Germany 14 754 461 195 109 106 35 979
Samuel Bouyain United States 18 731 1.0× 159 0.3× 68 0.3× 184 1.7× 249 2.3× 34 1.1k
Nicole Scholz Germany 10 394 0.5× 250 0.5× 89 0.5× 55 0.5× 81 0.8× 21 553
Thóra K. Bjarnadóttir Sweden 8 650 0.9× 463 1.0× 65 0.3× 81 0.7× 52 0.5× 10 875
Pranhitha Reddy United States 6 473 0.6× 391 0.8× 151 0.8× 53 0.5× 46 0.4× 9 1.4k
Clara L. Essmann United Kingdom 10 517 0.7× 366 0.8× 32 0.2× 15 0.1× 212 2.0× 17 856
Benjamin J. Frankfort United States 18 894 1.2× 307 0.7× 22 0.1× 154 1.4× 165 1.6× 44 1.3k
Robin A. Warren United States 6 1.0k 1.3× 360 0.8× 70 0.4× 48 0.4× 616 5.8× 6 1.3k
Weijia Dong Canada 15 362 0.5× 169 0.4× 24 0.1× 21 0.2× 140 1.3× 17 752
Darrell D. Norton United States 12 391 0.5× 101 0.2× 61 0.3× 24 0.2× 71 0.7× 14 644
Christopher C. Quinn United States 11 557 0.7× 382 0.8× 65 0.3× 9 0.1× 441 4.2× 23 959

Countries citing papers authored by Simone Prömel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simone Prömel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simone Prömel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simone Prömel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simone Prömel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simone Prömel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simone Prömel. The network helps show where Simone Prömel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simone Prömel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simone Prömel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simone Prömel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Simone Prömel. Simone Prömel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hildebrand, Peter W., et al.. (2025). Notch activity is modulated by the aGPCR Latrophilin binding the DSL ligand in C. elegans. Nature Communications. 16(1). 6461–6461.
2.
Thor, Doreen & Simone Prömel. (2025). Beyond incretins: targeting neurokinin receptors for obesity treatment. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 10(1). 21–21. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lehmann, Laura C., et al.. (2025). The N terminus-only function of adhesion GPCRs: emerging concepts. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 46(3). 231–248.
4.
6.
Ale‐Agha, Niloofar, et al.. (2024). The Adhesion GPCR ADGRL2/LPHN2 Can Protect Against Cellular and Organismal Dysfunction. Cells. 13(22). 1826–1826. 2 indexed citations
7.
Prömel, Simone, et al.. (2024). Dose-Dependent Effects of Lipopolysaccharide on the Endothelium—Sepsis versus Metabolic Endotoxemia-Induced Cellular Senescence. Antioxidants. 13(4). 443–443. 5 indexed citations
8.
Schöneberg, Torsten, et al.. (2022). NanoBRET in C. elegans illuminates functional receptor interactions in real time. BMC Molecular and Cell Biology. 23(1). 8–8. 2 indexed citations
9.
Schoeder, Clara T., et al.. (2021). Structural Perspective on Ancient Neuropeptide Y-like System reveals Hallmark Features for Peptide Recognition and Receptor Activation. Journal of Molecular Biology. 433(13). 166992–166992. 8 indexed citations
10.
Horn, Susanne, et al.. (2021). Latrophilin-1 drives neuron morphogenesis and shapes chemo- and mechanosensation-dependent behavior in C. elegans via a trans function. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 589. 152–158. 13 indexed citations
11.
Prömel, Simone, et al.. (2021). The Evolutionary History of Vertebrate Adhesion GPCRs and Its Implication on Their Classification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22(21). 11803–11803. 12 indexed citations
12.
Schöneberg, Torsten & Simone Prömel. (2019). Latrophilins and Teneurins in Invertebrates: No Love for Each Other?. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 13. 154–154. 7 indexed citations
13.
Winkler, Jana Barbro, Caroline Wilde, Sven Rothemund, et al.. (2017). Activation of Adhesion G Protein-coupled Receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 292(11). 4383–4394. 78 indexed citations
14.
Scholz, Nicole, Chonglin Guan, Isabella Maiellaro, et al.. (2017). Mechano-dependent signaling by Latrophilin/CIRL quenches cAMP in proprioceptive neurons. eLife. 6. 111 indexed citations
15.
Müller, Antje, Jana Barbro Winkler, Claudia R. Binder, et al.. (2015). Oriented Cell Division in the C. elegans Embryo Is Coordinated by G-Protein Signaling Dependent on the Adhesion GPCR LAT-1. PLoS Genetics. 11(10). e1005624–e1005624. 72 indexed citations
16.
Prömel, Simone, Marie Frickenhaus, Samantha Hughes, et al.. (2012). The GPS Motif Is a Molecular Switch for Bimodal Activities of Adhesion Class G Protein-Coupled Receptors. Cell Reports. 2(2). 321–331. 103 indexed citations
17.
Prömel, Simone, Helen Waller‐Evans, John B. Dixon, et al.. (2012). Characterization and functional study of a cluster of four highly conserved orphan adhesion‐GPCR in mouse. Developmental Dynamics. 241(10). 1591–1602. 48 indexed citations
18.
Waller‐Evans, Helen, Simone Prömel, Tobias Langenhan, et al.. (2010). The Orphan Adhesion-GPCR GPR126 Is Required for Embryonic Development in the Mouse. PLoS ONE. 5(11). e14047–e14047. 66 indexed citations
19.
Langenhan, Tobias, Simone Prömel, Lamia Mestek, et al.. (2009). Latrophilin Signaling Links Anterior-Posterior Tissue Polarity and Oriented Cell Divisions in the C. elegans Embryo. Developmental Cell. 17(4). 494–504. 102 indexed citations
20.
Vakonakis, Ioannis, Tobias Langenhan, Simone Prömel, Andreas Russ, & Iain D. Campbell. (2008). Solution Structure and Sugar-Binding Mechanism of Mouse Latrophilin-1 RBL: a 7TM Receptor-Attached Lectin-Like Domain. Structure. 16(6). 944–953. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026