Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Simon Shackley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Shackley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Shackley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Shackley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Shackley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Shackley. The network helps show where Simon Shackley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simon Shackley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simon Shackley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simon Shackley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Simon Shackley. Simon Shackley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shackley, Simon. (2015). Capacity Building for Efficient Utilization of Biomass for Bioenergy & Food Security in the GMS (TA7833-REG]: Output 4: Knowledge Product Series Biochar.1 indexed citations
7.
Shackley, Simon, et al.. (2014). Biochar Quality Mandate (BQM) version 1.0. Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh).9 indexed citations
8.
Shackley, Simon, et al.. (2013). Response to the UK Parliament Energy and Climate Change Committee, Enquiry on Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). Edinburgh Research Explorer.2 indexed citations
Holman, Ian, Peter Berry, M. Mokrech, et al.. (2007). Simulating the effects of future climate and socio-economic change in east Anglia and North West England: the RegIS2 project. Summary report. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).3 indexed citations
13.
Shackley, Simon. (2004). A decent carbon burial. The New Scientist. 183(2461). 26–26.1 indexed citations
14.
Shackley, Simon, Mercedes Bleda, & Dennis Bray. (2004). Developing Discourse Coalitions to Incorporate Stakeholder Perceptions and Responses. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).3 indexed citations
15.
Brown, Katrina, et al.. (2004). How do CDM projects contribute to sustainable development. Lund University Publications (Lund University).56 indexed citations
16.
Clarke, Simon, et al.. (2002). London's Warming: The Impacts of Climate Change on London. Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh).33 indexed citations
17.
Shackley, Simon, James S. Risbey, & Milind Kandlikar. (1998). Science and the Contested Problem of Climate Change: A Tale of Two Models. Energy & Environment. 8. 112–134.11 indexed citations
18.
Shackley, Simon, Richard Wood, Mirko Hornung, et al.. (1998). Changing by degrees - the impacts of climate change in the North West of England: technical overview. Edinburgh Research Explorer.3 indexed citations
Shackley, Simon. (1997). Science and Policymaking. Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 39(8). 3–3.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.