Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management
2015394 citationsJames Wilsdon, Liz Allen et al.Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Simon Kerridge
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Kerridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Kerridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Kerridge more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Kerridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Kerridge. The network helps show where Simon Kerridge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simon Kerridge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simon Kerridge.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simon Kerridge based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Simon Kerridge. Simon Kerridge is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kerridge, Simon, et al.. (2018). Research Administration around the World.. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 23(1).10 indexed citations
7.
Kerridge, Simon. (2018). Hitting the QR sweet spot: will new REF2021 rules lead to a different kind of game-playing?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).2 indexed citations
Wilsdon, James, Liz Allen, Eleonora Belfiore, et al.. (2015). The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).394 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Kerridge, Simon, et al.. (2015). Open Access and the REF: Issues and Potential Solutions Workshop: Executive Summary. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).1 indexed citations
13.
Kerridge, Simon, et al.. (2014). Open access for REF2020. Insights the UKSG journal. 27(1). 58–62.2 indexed citations
14.
Kerridge, Simon, et al.. (2014). Open Access Issues and Potential Solutions Workshop. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).
15.
Kerridge, Simon, et al.. (2012). C4D (CERIF for Datasets) – An Overview. euroCRIS DSpace CRIS digital repository (The International Organisation for Research Information).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.