Simon Denman

6.1k citations
169 papers · 3.7k indexed · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Denman

158 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Simon Denman
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2.0k
  • Signal Processing 414
  • Artificial Intelligence 1.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 550
  • Human-Computer Interaction 141
Replace Clinton Fookes with:
Clinton Fookes Australia
Matteo Matteucci Italy
Massimo Piccardi Australia
Antoni B. Chan Hong Kong
Aurobinda Routray India
Edward Jones Ireland
Jiquan Ngiam United States
Alexandre Bernardino Portugal
Lyudmila Mihaylova United Kingdom
Jasper Uijlings Italy
Simon Denman relative to Clinton Fookes Australia Clinton Fookes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Clinton Fookes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Denman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Denman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Denman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Denman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Denman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Denman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Denman. The network helps show where Simon Denman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Denman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Denman Line = papers co-authored together Simon Denman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 169 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018256
2 2009207
3 2021131
4 2017123
5 2021119
6 2011106
7 201499
8 201897
9 201286
10 202180
11 202069
12 201968
13 202166
14 202063
15
Heart Sound Segmentation using Bidirectional LSTMs with Attention
202060
16 202057
17 202053
18 201752
19 201450
20 201948

About Simon Denman

Simon Denman is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 169 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (64 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (41 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (37 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (17 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (16 papers), Gait Recognition and Analysis (14 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (13 papers) and Face recognition and analysis (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2.0k citations), Signal Processing (414 citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (550 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (141 citations). Simon Denman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Clinton Fookes, Sridha Sridharan, Tharindu Fernando, David Ryan, David Ahmedt‐Aristizabal, Harshala Gammulle, Kien Nguyen, Theekshana Dissanayake, Mohammad Ali Armin and Lars Petersson. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Vision and Image Understanding, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Pattern Recognition Letters, Pattern Recognition and Epilepsy & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact