Shuvadeep Ganguly
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shuvadeep Ganguly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shuvadeep Ganguly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shuvadeep Ganguly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shuvadeep Ganguly. Shuvadeep Ganguly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shuvadeep Ganguly
39 papers receiving 224 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Shuvadeep Ganguly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shuvadeep Ganguly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shuvadeep Ganguly. The network helps show where Shuvadeep Ganguly may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Shuvadeep Ganguly
This map shows the geographic impact of Shuvadeep Ganguly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shuvadeep Ganguly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shuvadeep Ganguly more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.