Shomik Sengupta

8.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
175 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

Shomik Sengupta is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Shomik Sengupta has authored 175 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 89 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 74 papers in Surgery and 33 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Shomik Sengupta's work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (51 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (41 papers) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (38 papers). Shomik Sengupta is often cited by papers focused on Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (51 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (41 papers) and Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (38 papers). Shomik Sengupta collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Shomik Sengupta's co-authors include Michael L. Blute, Bradley C. Leibovich, Horst Zincke, John C. Cheville, Eugene D. Kwon, Christine M. Lohse, W. Scott Webster, Joe J. Tjandra, Haidong Dong and R. Houston Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Shomik Sengupta

162 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Tumor B7-H1 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients with Long-term Follow-up

2006 696 citations Bradley C. Leibovich, Haidong Dong et al. profile →
Costimulatory B7-H1 in renal cell carcinoma patients: Indicator of tumor aggressiveness and potential therapeutic target

2004 635 citations R. Houston Thompson, Michael D. Gillett et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Shomik Sengupta Australia	32	2.3k	2.1k	1.5k	1.0k	817	175	4.9k
J H Scholefield United Kingdom	44	3.5k 1.5×	1.1k 0.6×	4.1k 2.8×	680 0.7×	664 0.8×	172	7.2k
Ludovico Muzii Italy	49	981 0.4×	413 0.2×	2.4k 1.6×	516 0.5×	608 0.7×	352	7.9k
G. Bastert Germany	37	2.8k 1.2×	790 0.4×	565 0.4×	822 0.8×	1.0k 1.3×	216	5.3k
M. Schneider France	38	2.8k 1.2×	1.3k 0.6×	811 0.5×	513 0.5×	1.0k 1.3×	108	5.8k
Maria De Santis Italy	46	2.5k 1.1×	2.2k 1.1×	6.2k 4.2×	888 0.9×	1.8k 2.2×	217	10.2k
Giorgos C. Karakousis United States	40	3.1k 1.3×	1.4k 0.7×	1.6k 1.1×	1.3k 1.3×	1.3k 1.6×	261	6.1k
Gaetano Ciancio United States	44	585 0.3×	1.8k 0.9×	3.2k 2.2×	611 0.6×	827 1.0×	363	7.2k
Giorgio Bogani Italy	42	1.0k 0.4×	573 0.3×	1.7k 1.2×	247 0.2×	440 0.5×	335	6.3k
Hugh Mostafid United Kingdom	27	969 0.4×	974 0.5×	4.2k 2.9×	198 0.2×	743 0.9×	74	5.2k
Marleen Praet Belgium	35	714 0.3×	1.1k 0.5×	1.0k 0.7×	186 0.2×	583 0.7×	165	4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Shomik Sengupta

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shomik Sengupta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shomik Sengupta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shomik Sengupta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shomik Sengupta

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shomik Sengupta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shomik Sengupta. The network helps show where Shomik Sengupta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shomik Sengupta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shomik Sengupta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shomik Sengupta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shomik Sengupta. Shomik Sengupta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Davis, Ian D., et al.. (2024). A phase 2 pilot study of water irrigation after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (WATIP) demonstrating safety, feasibility and activity. World Journal of Urology. 42(1). 115–115.

Lewin, Jeremy, Andrew Weickhardt, James Lynam, et al.. (2023). Patterns of Relapse in Australian Patients With Clinical Stage 1 Testicular Cancer: Utility of the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group Surveillance Recommendations. JCO Oncology Practice. 19(11). 973–980. 3 indexed citations

Davis, Ian D., et al.. (2023). Quality of transurethral resection of bladder tumour documentation: implications for non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer risk stratification and management. British Journal of Urology. 133(S4). 7–10. 1 indexed citations

Lim, Hyun, et al.. (2023). Reliability of the IDENTIFY calculator in stratifying risk of urothelial carcinoma in patients with haematuria: An initial evaluation at an Australian centre. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 173–177. 1 indexed citations

Viswambaram, Pravin, et al.. (2022). Centralization and prospective audit of cystectomy are necessary: a commentary on the case for centralization, supported by a contemporary series utilizing the ANZUP cystectomy database. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology. 19(3). 290–295. 2 indexed citations

Kealey, Joshua, et al.. (2021). Impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic on early detection of prostate cancer in Australia. British Journal of Urology. 128(S3). 6–8. 5 indexed citations

Yao, Henry H., et al.. (2021). Impact of radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer on bladder function as demonstrated on urodynamics study: A systematic review. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 15(12). E664–E671. 4 indexed citations

Sengupta, Shomik, et al.. (2019). “Mirror” ureteric colic caused by proximal ureteric calculus in massively hydronephrotic kidney. Urology Case Reports. 25. 100892–100892. 1 indexed citations

Chao, Michael, Daryl Lim Joon, Jason Wasiak, et al.. (2019). The use of tissue fiducial markers in improving the accuracy of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. Radiation Oncology Journal. 37(1). 43–50. 8 indexed citations

10.

Lawrence, Nicola Jane, Andrew Martin, Ian D. Davis, et al.. (2018). What Survival Benefits are Needed to Make Adjuvant Sorafenib Worthwhile After Resection of Intermediate- or High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma? Clinical Investigators’ Preferences in the SORCE Trial. PubMed. 2(2). 123–131. 4 indexed citations

11.

Hayne, Dickon, Martin R. Stockler, Nicola Jane Lawrence, et al.. (2017). BCG + Mitomycin trial for high‐risk non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer: progress report and lessons learned. British Journal of Urology. 119(S5). 55–57. 1 indexed citations

12.

Blinman, Prunella, Andrew Martin, Shomik Sengupta, et al.. (2017). Patients’ preferences for adjuvant sorafenib after resection of renal cell carcinoma in the SORCE trial: what makes it worthwhile?. Annals of Oncology. 29(2). 370–376. 12 indexed citations

13.

Rudra, A, et al.. (2008). Anaesthetic Implications of Substance Abuse in Adolescent. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5 indexed citations

14.

Schwartz, David J., Shomik Sengupta, David W. Hillman, et al.. (2007). Prediction of Radial Distance of Extraprostatic Extension From Pretherapy Factors. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 69(2). 411–418. 13 indexed citations

15.

Atwell, Thomas D., C. Thomas Wass, J. William Charboneau, et al.. (2006). Malignant Hypertension during Cryoablation of an Adrenal Gland Tumor. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 17(3). 573–575. 39 indexed citations

16.

Sengupta, Shomik, John C. Cheville, Christine M. Lohse, et al.. (2006). Conventional assessment of needle biopsy specimens is more useful than digital image analysis of proliferation and DNA ploidy in prediction of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy. Urology. 68(1). 94–98. 4 indexed citations

17.

Sengupta, Shomik, Jeffrey M. Slezak, Michael L. Blute, & Eric J. Bergstralh. (2006). Simple graphic method for estimation of prostate-specific antigen doubling time. Urology. 67(2). 408–409. 8 indexed citations

18.

Thompson, R. Houston, Michael D. Gillett, John C. Cheville, et al.. (2004). Costimulatory B7-H1 in renal cell carcinoma patients: Indicator of tumor aggressiveness and potential therapeutic target. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101(49). 17174–17179. 635 indexed citations breakdown →

19.

Sengupta, Shomik, et al.. (2002). Left paraduodenal hernia: Case report and review of the literature. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 72(1). 69–71. 35 indexed citations

20.

Sengupta, Shomik, et al.. (1998). Burkholderia pseudomallei in a case of hepatic abscess. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 16(2). 88. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact